Also, agreeing with everyone that the All Star game is dumb. 
In Australian rugby league, the equivalent is the state of origin, which is a 3 game series where players represent the state they grew up in, rather than where they are contracted to play. The games are extremely intense and physical.
It's a bit easier for rugby league, which is mostly only played in 2 Australian states, than for basketball in the US. But I imagine if players were representing where they grew up, there might be a bit more pride involved.
				
			In Australian rugby league, the equivalent is the state of origin, which is a 3 game series where players represent the state they grew up in, rather than where they are contracted to play. The games are extremely intense and physical.
It's a bit easier for rugby league, which is mostly only played in 2 Australian states, than for basketball in the US. But I imagine if players were representing where they grew up, there might be a bit more pride involved.
 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
	 
		 
 
		
 
 
		 The All-Star game is a popularity contest; it's marketing; it's politics. And it's marketing and politics that can earn or cost players money, as with other official "honors" bestowed upon players across the NBA. Some guys are awarded in this league based on nothing more than past performance. Some guys are awarded because of the market size in which they play. Some guys are awarded because of personality and marketability. And many others are snubbed because they're on the short ends of those particular sticks. Often it has nothing to do with who's most deserving. And plenty of media members who vote on these awards ballots have stated that they're pretty uncomfortable being part of an equation where their vote can ultimately cost players money.
 The All-Star game is a popularity contest; it's marketing; it's politics. And it's marketing and politics that can earn or cost players money, as with other official "honors" bestowed upon players across the NBA. Some guys are awarded in this league based on nothing more than past performance. Some guys are awarded because of the market size in which they play. Some guys are awarded because of personality and marketability. And many others are snubbed because they're on the short ends of those particular sticks. Often it has nothing to do with who's most deserving. And plenty of media members who vote on these awards ballots have stated that they're pretty uncomfortable being part of an equation where their vote can ultimately cost players money. 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		