Det/cha/sac

Sacramento Kings


Incoming Players
Raymond Felton
Salary: $4,148,715 Years Remaining: 1

And Emeka Sign and trade starting at around 10 mil per season.


Outgoing Players: Mikki Moore, Ron Artest, Shelden Williams
Detroit Pistons



Incoming Players
Ron Artest
Salary: $7,400,000 Years Remaining: 1

Nazr Mohammed
Salary: $6,049,400 Years Remaining: 3

Outgoing Players: Rasheed Wallace


Charlotte Bobcats.



Incoming Players
Rasheed Wallace
Salary: $13,930,000 Years Remaining: 1

Mikki Moore
Salary: $5,632,200 Years Remaining: 2

Shelden Williams
Salary: $3,395,760 Years Remaining: 1

Outgoing Players: Raymond Felton, Nazr Mohammed, and Emeka


So Kings trade Moore Artest and Sheldon to get Felton and Emeka.

DET trade Wallace to get Artest and Nazi

Cha Trade Felton, Emeka, and Nazi (who is a long contract they don't want) for Wallace Moore and Williams.

The only hold up is that DET might as for more. Don't know how to sweeten it for them.
 
I decieded I don't like it. DET Is not gonna go for it. There has to be a way to sweeten it. CHA might even balk at it but I think they would really like Wallace with the Brown and the UNC connection
 
Bro how could you pass as a kings fan? HOW Its to good to be true for us.


Felton isn't really that good for one.. He's good enough to pad his stats, but not good enough to take a team to the next level. You have seen Felton play right? He was a pretty darn good defender in college, but has not really brought that part of his game consistently to the NBA. He isn't a good shooter. A lot of people say that you can put shooters around non-shooters and hide their deficiency, but this causes problems for others to get open when they know they can slouch off of Felton because of him not being a deep threat. So there is a lot more to it than just loading a team with shooters to make up for it.

That's what keeps teams from being great.. You can see it in a lot of teams that look good on paper. There will be a couple guys that cant shoot which leaves defenders crowding the players that can. In guards that can't shoot it's almost like giving the other team an extra defensive rebounder. Having a PG that cannot shoot screws up a lot more than people might think.
 
Felton isn't really that good for one.. He's good enough to pad his stats, but not good enough to take a team to the next level. You have seen Felton play right? He was a pretty darn good defender in college, but has not really brought that part of his game consistently to the NBA. He isn't a good shooter. A lot of people say that you can put shooters around non-shooters and hide their deficiency, but this causes problems for others to get open when they know they can slouch off of Felton because of him not being a deep threat. So there is a lot more to it than just loading a team with shooters to make up for it.

That's what keeps teams from being great.. You can see it in a lot of teams that look good on paper. There will be a couple guys that cant shoot which leaves defenders crowding the players that can. In guards that can't shoot it's almost like giving the other team an extra defensive rebounder. Having a PG that cannot shoot screws up a lot more than people might think.

I agree for the most part, but that didn't stop San Antonio from winning championships when Parker was a terrible shooter (decent shooter now)
 
But trading ARTEST and a bad contact plus an unproven undersized kid for a futrue potential all star and a good floor general is bad? how?
 
Back
Top