Debating AI

Depends on what I'm doing. Simplest would be boring spreadsheet v2.xls but there's a lot of stuff I revise a common file by a date or a course number/exam name so I will do something like assignments test #2.doc or assignments 1-17.doc.

If I am doing a home media project I will stick with the sequential version number after every major change, and usually print a video or wav file to match. With complex video you might also need scene and shot naming conventions. I learned a lot of this when I was working for a visual effects company and just ported that into my everyday workflow. When I first moved to Portland I had to create and manage a multimedia library so used those conventions.

Oh I should add the main thing is anytime something gets shared I stick a version number on it even if nobody else does, so I can track and reference changes without relying on MS tools to do it. It's also way easier to undo "fixes" other people suggest that I reject.
 
Also, I am right there with you. My current laptop has a local copy of Office installed on it. I don't intend on changing that when I upgrade to a new one here in a few months (I've been receiving various messages that my memory is low and my hard drive seems to be failing). I am old school like that; I like my USB drives! :):):)
USB is old school??
 
I'm not allowed to use USB drives. God if I could put files on a thumbstick or flash drive instead of logging into the cloud to pull up a powerpoint my Friday routine would be much happier (and quicker, with the bonus of there being no chance of accidentally staying logged in!)
 
USB is old school??
Well, considering that everything is moving towards being cloud-based, yes, I do consider USB to be "old school"...But, as long as the USB port is in existence, and is functionable, I will always carry my SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB flash drive with me wherever I go. And if I ever have to upgrade to another flash drive, I will gladly do so...:):):)
 

A snippet:

View attachment 14682

As many would suspect, "AI" remains a vague classification for technologies that are currently in search of a product. There will be narrow use cases that arise from this morass, but any business hoping to deploy "AI" as a cost-saving replacement for a human workforce is going to be profoundly disappointed. Perhaps these technologies will eventually evolve into the magic that overly optimistic tech executives see in them, but there's a lot of hype in the air, and I'm not convinced that "AI" is the future, at least not in the way it's often described. It seems more like an extension of the "ensh*ttification" that has plagued the modern internet across the last fifteen years or so.
 

The tech moguls keep fronting like Artificial General Intelligence is going to surpass human intelligence in naught plus one years meanwhile everything they turn over to AI is failing like you would expect it to if it were managed by an adolescent. It seems to me that human intelligence has a lot more intuition involved within it than most scientists have been willing to admit.
 
Back
Top