Davion Mitchell

#33
Not sure if people know this - Davion was working out with Steph Curry's trainer in this off-season. Makes a heckuvalot of sense to me. Mitchell is doing everything in his power to get better.
I'm pretty convinced he will be way better just judging off of the interview he had with deuce/mo and some rico Hines highlights I saw

I notably saw a make that he had from deep and the shot swished differently than what I noticed before.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
#34
Not sure if people know this - Davion was working out with Steph Curry's trainer in this off-season. Makes a heckuvalot of sense to me. Mitchell is doing everything in his power to get better.
I'll be curious to see what changes he makes to his motion and if they stick long term. Davion thus far uses a lot of legs in his jumper and he also has a very high arcing shot. Both of those add unpredictability. I'd love to see him simplify his mechanics and slow down his wrist flick.
 
#35
C Lyles
PF Vezenkov
SF Duarte
SG Monk
PG Mitchell

Is a 2nd unit with tons of scoring/spacing potential.
We just have to hope Brown gets to this sooner than later. Got a bad feeling Javale is going to get the first crack at back-up C minutes and it'll be a real real mistake.

I keep thinking about our main reserve LU last year and how much better it can be with Lyles at the 5 and Vezenkov at the 4. Potentially just an elite elite offensive grouping with giving Fox and Monk free range to the rim with defenses having to respect that elite spacing from Vezenkov/Lyles pairing.

Fox
Monk
Keegan/HB
Vezenkov
Lyles

My word. Just after you get done with dealing with our starting unit running you off ball screen after ball screen, now you have to figure out if you want elite shooters to stay wide open or let Fox/Monk attack the rim with no rim protection.
 
#36
I'll be curious to see what changes he makes to his motion and if they stick long term. Davion thus far uses a lot of legs in his jumper and he also has a very high arcing shot. Both of those add unpredictability. I'd love to see him simplify his mechanics and slow down his wrist flick.
Essentially he changed his breathing to be less tense and worked on keeping his body upright when he would shoot according to him.

He was measuring the arc on his shots and said he got it basically to a consistent range from what I recall.

Nothing was changed in terms of his form which are his words.

Excited to see how the shot looks now!
 

kingsboi

Hall of Famer
#38
I think the thinking here is that his lack of offense is what's keeping him off the floor. A Davion Mitchell that is a effective on offense is, combined with his ELITE defense all the sudden becomes sixth man of the year type material.

But the Kings actually did struggle to put up points in certain stretches last year. It was the story to two teams. Our starting five, plus Malik, were so nuts on offense that it covered up for some combos that would go completely cold for 4-5 minutes at a time. We need to eliminate those stretches and Mitchell becoming a mini spark plug on offense can go a long way towards that.
Mitchell all of a sudden improving his three point percentages isn't going to make the Kings offense much better. Where it starts is with Sabonis taking and making his mid-range shots and with a whole summer to heal the hand, we will see how much he's come along. In the meantime, you can't sit Davion just because he isn't shooting well but that's just my view on it and instead use his elite skill, winning organizations utilize their players all the time in this sense, it's time the Kings do the same thing.
 
Last edited:

Kingster

Hall of Famer
#40
I'll be curious to see what changes he makes to his motion and if they stick long term. Davion thus far uses a lot of legs in his jumper and he also has a very high arcing shot. Both of those add unpredictability. I'd love to see him simplify his mechanics and slow down his wrist flick.
He does, which makes for a slower release. His "too much leg" jumper reminds me of Bagley in that regard.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
#41
Essentially he changed his breathing to be less tense and worked on keeping his body upright when he would shoot according to him.

He was measuring the arc on his shots and said he got it basically to a consistent range from what I recall.

Nothing was changed in terms of his form which are his words.

Excited to see how the shot looks now!
I've never heard of this before, but it makes a lot of sense. Reminds me of yoga that focuses on breathing to relieve tension in the body.
 
#42
Mitchell all of a sudden improving his three point percentages isn't going to make the Kings offense much better. Where it starts is with Sabonis taking and making his mid-range shots and with a whole summer to heal the hand, we will see how much he's come along. In the meantime, you can't sit Davion just because he isn't shooting well but that's just my view on it and instead use his elite skill, winning organizations utilize their players all the time in this sense, it's time the Kings do the same thing.
Davion becoming a better shooter would make the Kings a better team. He’s a plus defender but defenses don’t respect his shot so this crowds the paint for Fox and Sabonis, which bogs the offense down thus limiting his impact as his impact defensively is negated by the loss on offense. If teams can’t sag off him he would be a plus on both ends.
 
#43
Davion becoming a better shooter would make the Kings a better team. He’s a plus defender but defenses don’t respect his shot so this crowds the paint for Fox and Sabonis, which bogs the offense down thus limiting his impact as his impact defensively is negated by the loss on offense. If teams can’t sag off him he would be a plus on both ends.
If Davion shot 40% from 3 he'd be one of the best role players in the league and prob win 6MOY
 

kingsboi

Hall of Famer
#44
Davion becoming a better shooter would make the Kings a better team. He’s a plus defender but defenses don’t respect his shot so this crowds the paint for Fox and Sabonis, which bogs the offense down thus limiting his impact as his impact defensively is negated by the loss on offense. If teams can’t sag off him he would be a plus on both ends.
expecting all 15 players on the roster to be capable shooters is unrealistic, some have their warts and you accept it or get rid of it
 
#45
expecting all 15 players on the roster to be capable shooters is unrealistic, some have their warts and you accept it or get rid of it
Im not saying players won’t have their weaknesses, I’m not expecting Davion to turn into Steph Curry. He has room to improve and I believe is capable of being a better shooter. Are you saying he has reached his ceiling as a player?
 
#46
As much as I like Davion as a player and person, it is likely that he will not be a King by the end of the season if there is a trade of any kind. He just might be the "extra value" piece that would make a productive trade possible. He would be a useful fit on many other teams.
 

kingsboi

Hall of Famer
#47
Im not saying players won’t have their weaknesses, I’m not expecting Davion to turn into Steph Curry. He has room to improve and I believe is capable of being a better shooter. Are you saying he has reached his ceiling as a player?
I've mentioned on a number of occasions that he is a gym rat and those type of players improve as the seasons go by, if he doesn't become a good shooter in x amount of years that doesn't mean he still can't be an impactful player for this team until the shooting comes around
 
#48
I've mentioned on a number of occasions that he is a gym rat and those type of players improve as the seasons go by, if he doesn't become a good shooter in x amount of years that doesn't mean he still can't be an impactful player for this team until the shooting comes around
Agreed, he would just become more of a situational type of player or he would need to play with a team filled with shooters. He absolutely has value though and one could do a whole lot worse than having Davion Mitchell on your bench.
 
#50
I've mentioned on a number of occasions that he is a gym rat and those type of players improve as the seasons go by, if he doesn't become a good shooter in x amount of years that doesn't mean he still can't be an impactful player for this team until the shooting comes around
I agree with you that he is impactful as he is now as a defender, but his role is limited. My point is if he can improve as a shooter he has the potential to be a high level to elite role player. His first 2 years from 3 he’s at about 31-32% on 3+ attempts per game, if he can get that up to 36-37% on 4+ attempts per game would be a game changer and Mike Brown would have a tough time keeping him off the floor.
 

kingsboi

Hall of Famer
#51
I agree with you that he is impactful as he is now as a defender, but his role is limited. My point is if he can improve as a shooter he has the potential to be a high level to elite role player. His first 2 years from 3 he’s at about 31-32% on 3+ attempts per game, if he can get that up to 36-37% on 4+ attempts per game would be a game changer and Mike Brown would have a tough time keeping him off the floor.
no doubt that added shooting would help up his playing time so its just a matter of when will that shot come around and drop consistently, in the meantime, I think Brown would be doing the Kings a disservice if he isn't in the regular rotation just for the fact that he wears the other guards down.
 

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
#53
To me the great news about Mitchel's improved shooting and Colby looking like the real thing is that it should mean more rest for Fox and a shorter rope or Kevin/Monk on their off nights. This should not only translate into a few more wins but, most importantly a better-prepared team for post season.
 
Last edited:
#54
I agree with you that he is impactful as he is now as a defender, but his role is limited. My point is if he can improve as a shooter he has the potential to be a high level to elite role player. His first 2 years from 3 he’s at about 31-32% on 3+ attempts per game, if he can get that up to 36-37% on 4+ attempts per game would be a game changer and Mike Brown would have a tough time keeping him off the floor.
Hmm. Here's the deal. We have the following guards
Fox
Davion
Kevin
Monk

These are the top 4 guys. Others like Colby, Duarte, Ford, Keon are lower in the depth chart, but might move up during the season, or due to some injury.

Of the 4, Monk is the only real combo guard. Fox and Davion lack size and shooting to play 2 for long periods, and Kevin lacks floor management. Even if Davion becomes a much better shooter, he can't play with Fox except for short stretches.

I agree that he plays bigger than his size, is extremely strong, and with his defense, can give problems to slightly taller players too. However, I don't think playing him at 2 is a long term solution, particularly when we have two of our top 6/7 guys already playing that position.

So, his increased minutes will largely come at Fox's expense. Might not be an entirely bad thing over the season, or when Fox skips games. However, you want your best player to be on the floor as much as possible, particularly in critical/playoff games.

So, yes. I agree that Davion will help the team a lot if he improves as a shooter. I still think that this impact will be limited to the minutes Fox is off the floor. It might be a Bobby/Bibby kind of situation, though there, Bobby was more of a combo guard, a clear third option at that position on the depth chart, and Doug was known more for defense than shooting. Here, the roles are slightly reversed for Davion wrt Kevin and Monk.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
#55
Mitchell looks to be an improved outside shooter. Good for him. His off-season work appears to have paid off in that regard. That said, his play-making has been subpar. Too many turnovers, no real creativity in assist-making, and far too often trying to do too much with the ball. He also is very average in getting his own shot off. Obviously, his defense is great one on one, but as others have pointed out this feature of his game gets diminished somewhat by a league that switches so often. In sum, he's a mixed bag for me. If you asked me if I had to choose between Mitchell and Jones I'd say Jones.
 
#56
Hmm. Here's the deal. We have the following guards
Fox
Davion
Kevin
Monk

These are the top 4 guys. Others like Colby, Duarte, Ford, Keon are lower in the depth chart, but might move up during the season, or due to some injury.

Of the 4, Monk is the only real combo guard. Fox and Davion lack size and shooting to play 2 for long periods, and Kevin lacks floor management. Even if Davion becomes a much better shooter, he can't play with Fox except for short stretches.

I agree that he plays bigger than his size, is extremely strong, and with his defense, can give problems to slightly taller players too. However, I don't think playing him at 2 is a long term solution, particularly when we have two of our top 6/7 guys already playing that position.

So, his increased minutes will largely come at Fox's expense. Might not be an entirely bad thing over the season, or when Fox skips games. However, you want your best player to be on the floor as much as possible, particularly in critical/playoff games.

So, yes. I agree that Davion will help the team a lot if he improves as a shooter. I still think that this impact will be limited to the minutes Fox is off the floor. It might be a Bobby/Bibby kind of situation, though there, Bobby was more of a combo guard, a clear third option at that position on the depth chart, and Doug was known more for defense than shooting. Here, the roles are slightly reversed for Davion wrt Kevin and Monk.
You do realize that both Fox and Monk are listed as 6'3? Personally, I think Fox looks bigger, but hard to judge on TV.
 
#57
Hmm. Here's the deal. We have the following guards
Fox
Davion
Kevin
Monk

These are the top 4 guys. Others like Colby, Duarte, Ford, Keon are lower in the depth chart, but might move up during the season, or due to some injury.

Of the 4, Monk is the only real combo guard. Fox and Davion lack size and shooting to play 2 for long periods, and Kevin lacks floor management. Even if Davion becomes a much better shooter, he can't play with Fox except for short stretches.

I agree that he plays bigger than his size, is extremely strong, and with his defense, can give problems to slightly taller players too. However, I don't think playing him at 2 is a long term solution, particularly when we have two of our top 6/7 guys already playing that position.

So, his increased minutes will largely come at Fox's expense. Might not be an entirely bad thing over the season, or when Fox skips games. However, you want your best player to be on the floor as much as possible, particularly in critical/playoff games.

So, yes. I agree that Davion will help the team a lot if he improves as a shooter. I still think that this impact will be limited to the minutes Fox is off the floor. It might be a Bobby/Bibby kind of situation, though there, Bobby was more of a combo guard, a clear third option at that position on the depth chart, and Doug was known more for defense than shooting. Here, the roles are slightly reversed for Davion wrt Kevin and Monk.
I don’t agree that an increase in minutes for Davion would come at Fox’s expense. I absolutely think Davion and Fox could play together with improved shooting from Davion as both are capable of guarding up. I think there’s a chance this year we’ll see a three guard lineup of Mitchell/Fox/Monk all playing together at times.
 
#59
You do realize that both Fox and Monk are listed as 6'3? Personally, I think Fox looks bigger, but hard to judge on TV.
I actually thought Monk was bigger, so my bad on that.

That said, I think Monk is more of a combo guard; in that he can be a secondary play maker and has a good outside shot. Fox is more of a lead guard. However, I do admit that I was also talking in terms of defending the two position, where I thought Monk had more size.
 
#60
I don’t agree that an increase in minutes for Davion would come at Fox’s expense. I absolutely think Davion and Fox could play together with improved shooting from Davion as both are capable of guarding up. I think there’s a chance this year we’ll see a three guard lineup of Mitchell/Fox/Monk all playing together at times.
Will be great if it happens. Having three strong ball handlers, with one having a great midrange game, and two good outside shooters would be a dream. Couple that with strong defense, and additional outside shooting of Murray/Barnes/Sasha, and it would be great.

Once again though; between Barnes, Murray, Sasha, and Lyles, some of them will see a lot of time at 3. Perhaps, some of the remaining minutes will go the lineup you suggested.