Not sure what you mean, but if that means replace him with a coach who has some common sense, sign me up.
Weird. I brought up his substitution problem and lack of attention to defense/rebounding just a few days ago and was told I was wrong, need to give it up and that Smart was the best thing that has happened to our team. Got killed for stating it in a game thread. Now the board is flooded with the same complaints.
This happened last year in GS. It's been an increasing problem here with Smart, is getting worse and very well might have cost us the game today. For a coach who speaks a lot about consistency, he might just be the most inconsistent coach in the league right now. Just changes his lineups and substitutions every other day it seems.
I think this may already be in the books given the Maloofs "we want him to be our coach forever" statement.
My esteem is lessening by the night howeer. Disappointing as all the demons I feared he might have were just slow to manifest. KNows the game and how to communicate it, but spoiled by bad mentoring.
Don't want to speak for others, but I think the issue is, and it's this way for me at least, is that you can tell when players aren't playing well, and can separate that from whether a coach is playing well. If a coach puts players in a position to succeed and they fail, clearly not the coaches fault. But when players aren't put in a position to succeed?I don't know how some of you can beat on the coach tonight when 80% of the guys who stepped on the floor had multiple major bonehead type mistakes all game long. So the answer is to fire yet another coach and bring in a guy who is of collecting social security age and watch him tear apart the roster again and then skip town one or two years into that process? Makes no sense to me. There is improvement happening and it has over the last month largely with road games and few practices. Because it doesn't happen overnight the knee jerkers start trying to trade players and fire coaches.
I don't know how some of you can beat on the coach tonight when 80% of the guys who stepped on the floor had multiple major bonehead type mistakes all game long. So the answer is to fire yet another coach and bring in a guy who is of collecting social security age and watch him tear apart the roster again and then skip town one or two years into that process? Makes no sense to me. There is improvement happening and it has over the last month largely with road games and few practices. Because it doesn't happen overnight the knee jerkers start trying to trade players and fire coaches.
Don't want to speak for others, but I think the issue is, and it's this way for me at least, is that you can tell when players aren't playing well, and can separate that from whether a coach is playing well. If a coach puts players in a position to succeed and they fail, clearly not the coaches fault. But when players aren't put in a position to succeed?
Much like I felt about Westphal, firing for the sake of firing rarely turns out well unless you have a decent plan to get an actual upgrade. Firing Smart will be coach number 5 in 6 years. Has any other team in the league had this much coaching turnover? Smart is subbing himself out of a job here. Which is a bummer because he could actually be a decent coach if he stopped trying to make things so complicated.
Watch out. Once the tribe lights the torches and grabs the pitchforks, you're better off to just step out of the way.
For the record, I agree with you but it seems to be the minority opinion, at least among the more vocal members of the board.
Much like I felt about Westphal, firing for the sake of firing rarely turns out well unless you have a decent plan to get an actual upgrade. Firing Smart will be coach number 5 in 6 years. Has any other team in the league had this much coaching turnover? Smart is subbing himself out of a job here. Which is a bummer because he could actually be a decent coach if he stopped trying to make things so complicated.