Gargamel
Starter
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=bayless/050701&num=0
Welcome to Los Angeles, villian.
Welcome to Los Angeles, villian.
Last edited:
SDKing said:hmmmm, guess I wasn't the only one who thought so.
Gargamel said:For the record, it's disgusting, yet predictable (coming from BSPN) that a media member trashes a 17 year old for no good reason other than for following Shaq (who's beloved now). Makes me wonder what the true motivation for such an article is. Seems like an unadulterated hits-grab. That's why they're called BS-PN. Ask Jeremy Roenick. He knows.
hoopsfan said:"it doesnt matter if we didnt make the playoffs last year, who has more rings?"
There you go..now you're getting it.![]()
SDKing said:my point is not to judge Bynum's personal life, he's 17. I know that lots of teens have myspace accounts, no biggie. What I agree with is that he's questioning the maturity of young professional athletes. Some do just fine, others get in way over their heads. Is he socially ready for the NBA or will it break him?
AriesMar27 said:im going to buy his laker jersey, he'll be the highlight of being a kings fan living in los angeles......
VF21 said:What's truly pathetic is that Skip Bayless obviously thinks he's all that and a bag of chips. Incredibly clever, witty, erstute, etc. He could have written the article without making it a hit piece about Bynum - but that wouldn't have been nearly as much fun. Bayless is, in effect, creating the very situation he wants to see if young athletes are able to handle. Journalists are supposed to write about the story, NOT contribute to the creation of the situation that will become the story. Shame on Bayless... just another reason it's becoming obvious they really do want to be known as BSPN.