Breton: Kings have right man at the wheel

http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/basketball/kings/story/14223878p-15048768c.html

Marcos Bretón: For long-term journey, Kings have right man at wheel
B]By Marcos Bretón -- Bee Sports Columnist
Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, March 1, 2006[/B]

Today the Kings begin a five-game road trip that could make or break a fractured season of frustration and inconsistency. After all, the revived Kings with Ron Artest still are 1-6 on the road since he joined them for a loss at Boston on Jan. 27. And they are 7-19 in road games overall.

Should that trend continue this week, setting the stage for early vacations at Arco Arena, then what?

Let the coach walk when the season is over? No way.

Rick Adelman deserves to come back next season.

He is better than anyone the Kings could replace him with. And he has done an admirable job of wedging a disparate jumble of square pegs into round holes, of making sense of a unit that seemed nonsensical.

In fact, let's say it straight: Rick Adelman was, in many ways, set up to fail this season.

He was handed a team tabbed a division contender when, in reality, the Kings were as stable as a three-legged chair. The three legs being: Mike Bibby, Peja Stojakovic and Brad Miller - men loaded with potential but unable to realize it together.

Then there was a 10-year veteran in Shareef Abdur-Rahim, who never had won or reached the playoffs. There was Bonzi Wells, who was trying to revive his career. And all others of note were kids learning on the fly.

What was the brain trust at Arco Arena thinking?

What were the rest of us thinking?

That's just it: There was no thinking, only a search for scapegoats in a business in which blame runs downhill.

So it became easy to slime Adelman, though he didn't make the trades, set the roster, overinflate expectations or take the floor himself to miss all those open looks and defensive assignments.

You want to blame Adelman because Stojakovic - consciously or subconsciously - tanked it while he was here? You want to blame him because Miller and Bibby seemingly needed Artest's strong presence to elevate their games?

You want to blame Adelman because the Kings haven't won a championship, though Kings president Geoff Petrie hasn't won one, either? You want to blame Adelman because the Kings missed 14 free throws in Game 7 of the 2002 Western Conference finals against the Los Angeles Lakers?

You want to blame him because the Kings' title window closed long ago, though few wanted to admit it - or utter the dreaded words "rebuilding year?"

Go ahead. But who are you going to get who is better than Adelman?

Before answering that, have you noticed how Larry Brown hasn't looked like much of a "genius" without an elite team under his watch? Or how Phil Jackson hasn't looked like one without multiple Hall of Famers doing his bidding?

Meanwhile, have you noticed how Adelman has helped shape something in Sacramento that all teams yearn for?

Hope for the future.

Yes. The miserable Kings team of December now shows bona fide promise with Artest, with Bibby and Miller in their primes and with two fantastic young talents in Kevin Martin and Francisco García.

Some whine that these men lack the stage presence of Chris Webber, Vlade Divac, Doug Christie and Bobby Jackson. But you know what? That special unit - men who are gone though Kings fans still clutch their jerseys - took several years of growth and failure to flower.

Kings Nation accepted that but now expects winning is as easy as Adelman whispering "be talented" to a still-inconsistent team of quiet dudes.

OK. Does the man himself think he deserves to come back?

"Yes, I do," Adelman said. "We've made a ton of changes this year, and I tried to adjust to them. ... You've got a real positive base here, and that's what I want to be a part of. We've got a chance, and even if we don't quite get there this year, things have turned."

Said Petrie: "Rick is a terrific coach, a proven winner. ... We're all on the same page, working to get this team to finish the best we can."

The best way to do that? Keep the guy who kept his head and kept a mediocre team in it this far.



This is, IMHO, the fairest article I've seen about Adelman.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I seldom agree with Breton, but in this case I think he's spot on. RA is the coach of the Kings. Now and in the future IMHO.
 
Yikes! Just saw that the article got posted twice -- I'm not sure how I did that!:o Could a moderator please help merge these?


taken care of -- brick
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You want to blame Adelman because Stojakovic - consciously or subconsciously - tanked it while he was here?

At least someone else see's it besides me.

I agree with the article. Keep Adelman. There isn't anything better on the market, and there are a LOT worse things than Adelman. Also, these guys are starting to work together. Learning the system more and more. If you want to see a complete rebuild change the coach. It will knock down the foundation we are currently building with the new squad.
 
I completely agree with Breton, which is rare. However, the best part of this article are the quotes from Adelman as to him wanting to stick around. Rick has invested so mucn in this current team, ableit they are all relatively new pieces and he deserves to see this thing through. Give him a 5-6 year deal and we'll be set.
 
Don't know about five or six years, but he deserves more than one. The one thing the team needs now is some continuity going forward, starting at the top.

It was also good to see Adelman giving the indication that he would like to come back. Much different than his previous stance on returning, although not sure that was an accurate reflection of his mindset.
 
I think of it as more an indication he would consider/be interested in coming back than a statement that he would. That's enough for me from him at this point, after all he's been through. He's sharp enough to keep all his options open.
 
whozit said:
It was also good to see Adelman giving the indication that he would like to come back. Much different than his previous stance on returning, although not sure that was an accurate reflection of his mindset.

Let us remember that once any King indicates that they want to stay, they almost immediately get let go. It's like the kiss of death around here. ;)
 
Warhawk said:
I think of it as more an indication he would consider/be interested in coming back than a statement that he would. That's enough for me from him at this point, after all he's been through. He's sharp enough to keep all his options open.

And also I think an indication for/to the Brothers Maloof to go ahead and throw some kind of offer his way. At this point in the season it's not very wise to have that kind of distraction there for your head coach imho.
 
The Maloofs need to get him signed immediately. They can't wait around til the offseason and then when he's a free agent coach hit him up with an offer. That's what Seattle did with Nate and they botched it.
 
I'm as amazed as all of you are .... good article :cool:


Yes. The miserable Kings team of December now shows bona fide promise with Artest, with Bibby and Miller in their primes and with two fantastic young talents in Kevin Martin and Francisco García.

Some whine that these men lack the stage presence of Chris Webber, Vlade Divac, Doug Christie and Bobby Jackson. But you know what? That special unit - men who are gone though Kings fans still clutch their jerseys - took several years of growth and failure to flower.


Thank You, Marcus .... as frustrating as it has been this season, I'm optimistic looking into the future ... it's all a matter of ACCEPTANCE


 
I know people here have grown comfortable with Adelman. Heck, you should ... he's won.

But, he's not going to win with this team and he's not going to win unless he shows a commitment to forcing his players to play defense.

I call BS on the article and Adelman. This team should be winning, instead we seem intent on playing just like the Kings of old rather than to our strengths.

Goodbye Adelman. Hello future.
 
and breton scores hits the winning bucket!

i don't usually dig on his articles, but this one is fantastically spot-on! it's not a particularly long piece, and its not even the most well-written piece i've seen from breton, but it makes a point that so many kings fans are missing. its been known for a while that its both the maloofs and adelman's choice concerning whether he returns or not next season. adelman can walk if he wants to, and the maloofs can re-sign him if they want to. but now adelman has said that he wants to return. he sees the potential in a team that didn't have much potential early on this season. if the maloofs don't extend him a new contract sometime in the near future, i'm gonna be very disappointed.
 
RA once said a year or two back (not an exact quote) something to the effect of .... Do you think we don't practice defense, I have spent numerous days in a row concentrating on primarily defense, but the players have to still execute that plan .... eluding to the fact that he has spent a good portion of there practice time on D with the team not institutuing what was taught in the game.
 
macadocious said:
RA once said a year or two back (not an exact quote) something to the effect of .... Do you think we don't practice defense, I have spent numerous days in a row concentrating on primarily defense, but the players have to still execute that plan .... eluding to the fact that he has spent a good portion of there practice time on D with the team not institutuing what was taught in the game.

Weak excuse.

A real coach forces their players to play the scheme and rewards/punishes them to that effect.
 
playmaker0017 said:
I know people here have grown comfortable with Adelman. Heck, you should ... he's won.

But, he's not going to win with this team and he's not going to win unless he shows a commitment to forcing his players to play defense.

I call BS on the article and Adelman. This team should be winning, instead we seem intent on playing just like the Kings of old rather than to our strengths.

Goodbye Adelman. Hello future.

The problem with all your points playmaker is you point out the problem but you don't give any fixes. Adelman isn't the best coach in the league but he's done the best with what the roster is. He doesn't set the roster. As the article pointed out, Larry Brown has looked like a genius over the last couple of seasons in Detroit, is he now a retard because the roster has changed from Great to Crap?

With the previous roster, he didn't really have a chance to win. You can't win without any good defensive players. He couldnt' do anything about that. He had a system which suited those players but even then without proper skillsets they can't possibly succeed.

You can penalize the players such as Miller and Bibby for not playing great D. You can even sit them on the bench but what are the fans and the GM going to think when your sitting your 2 best players (at the time) because they don't do something well when in fact they've never done it well.

Before Doug got old, we had a player who could back for all of the teams mistakes. Likewise we have that in Artest. Artest has also shown himself to be a leader and help the others play D. We still need to work on help D, we still need a post defender.

You can't blame Adelman for the injuries and the GM moves. I'm not a huge Adelman fan but unless there is some sort of better solution, he seems like the best especially when he seems like the perfect coach to keep Artest grounded.
 
love_them_kings said:
So it became easy to slime Adelman, though he didn't make the trades, set the roster, overinflate expectations or take the floor himself to miss all those open looks and defensive assignments.

You want to blame Adelman because Stojakovic - consciously or subconsciously - tanked it while he was here? You want to blame him because Miller and Bibby seemingly needed Artest's strong presence to elevate their games?

You want to blame Adelman because the Kings haven't won a championship, though Kings president Geoff Petrie hasn't won one, either? You want to blame Adelman because the Kings missed 14 free throws in Game 7 of the 2002 Western Conference finals against the Los Angeles Lakers?

You want to blame him because the Kings' title window closed long ago, though few wanted to admit it - or utter the dreaded words "rebuilding year?"
Hmmm....logic from the Bee? A refreshing change.
 
bigbadred00 said:
The problem with all your points playmaker is you point out the problem but you don't give any fixes.
Start Rahim
Bench Thomas
Start SAR
Bench K9
Start Reef
Bench Kenny

I thought I would answer your question on playmakers behalf
 
Yoda said:
Start Rahim
Bench Thomas
Start SAR
Bench K9
Start Reef
Bench Kenny

I thought I would answer your question on playmakers behalf

Heh.

We can do that. And then Kenny will blow. We might be slightly better starting but our bench will get worse. I honestly don't mind us startin SAR, thing is, Kenny hasn't proved he can come off the bench yet. And if he can't, it can't possibly help the team especially when the team can't score off the bench without SAR.
 
Playmaker: What is your explanation for the fact that Rick coached arguably the best defensive team in the league in 02-03? That he knew how to coach defense then, but forgot how?
 
kennadog said:
Playmaker: What is your explanation for the fact that Rick coached arguably the best defensive team in the league in 02-03? That he knew how to coach defense then, but forgot how?

Talent, age, and injuries baby, talent, age and injuries.

2002-Webber is healthy, Bobby is healthy, Vlade is Shaq slower-downer, Doug is one of the best defenders in the league, we have Keon, Hedo, and others on the bench who can defend.

2005-Webber is hurt, Peja is hurt, Brad gets hurt, Bobby gets hurt, bench depth is lost.

2006 pre-artest, Peja Hurt, Bonzi Hurt, SAR hurt, no good defenders, bench is weaker than past.
 
bigbadred00 said:
Talent, age, and injuries baby, talent, age and injuries.

2002-Webber is healthy, Bobby is healthy, Vlade is Shaq slower-downer, Doug is one of the best defenders in the league, we have Keon, Hedo, and others on the bench who can defend.

2005-Webber is hurt, Peja is hurt, Brad gets hurt, Bobby gets hurt, bench depth is lost.

2006 pre-artest, Peja Hurt, Bonzi Hurt, SAR hurt, no good defenders, bench is weaker than past.
That wasn't my point. I know that the reason the defense was better is the difference in personnel. My point is that people keep writing in here that Adleman doesn't know how to get his players to play defense or act like he's incapable of coaching defense. Obviously, he's not. I've posted this before about the 02-03 Kings:

#1 in FG % against
#1 in 3PFG % against
#1 in defensive RBs (not good at all in OFF RBs, tho, so slightly out-rebounded overall)
#2 in point differential
#2 in steals
#4 in Assists to TO ratio
#11 in OPP TOs
#12 in TO differential
#12 in blocks (and didn’t get blocked much on OFF)

Partial Roster: Webber (pre-knee collapse), Divac, Stojakovich; Christie; Bibby; B Jackson; Pollard; Clark; Turkoglu; Wallace; J Jackson

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&season=2003&seasontype=2
 
Last edited:
kennadog said:
That wasn't my point. I know that the reason the defense was better is the difference in personnel. My point is that people keep writing in here that Adleman doesn't know how to get his players to play defense or act like he's incapable of coaching defense. Obviously, he's not. I've posted this before about the 02-03 Kings:

#1 in FG % against
#1 in 3PFG % against
#1 in defensive RBs (not good at all in OFF RBs, tho, so slightly out-rebounded overall)
#2 in point differential
#2 in steals
#4 in Assists to TO ratio
#11 in OPP TOs
#12 in TO differential
#12 in blocks (and didn’t get blocked much on OFF)

Partial Roster: Webber (pre-knee collapse), Divac, Stojakovich; Christie; Bibby; B Jackson; Pollard; Clark; Turkoglu; Wallace; J Jackson

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=tmcompare&season=2003&seasontype=2[/quote]

I know, just trying to point PlayMaker ( who seems to be a SAR fan ahead of a Kings fan alot of the time) a history lesson.
 
kennadog said:
Playmaker: What is your explanation for the fact that Rick coached arguably the best defensive team in the league in 02-03? That he knew how to coach defense then, but forgot how?

I don't think he forgot, I don't think he ever knew. I think they were a good defensive team due to talent - not due to anything the coach did or tried to get his players to do.

This coach is trying to be the same coach as he was with a different team. This team is NOT that team. It's time for a change.

Is there an easy solution? I don't know. I do know that this coach continually tries to play a brand of basketball not suited to the players at his disposal. I know that instead of confrontation, he takes the easy road and lets the players do what they would like for the most part.

I can't imagine letting bibby lollygag down court and jack up shots 4 seconds into the shot clock with no one under the basket. I'd bench him for a quarter.
 
Yoda said:
Start Rahim
Bench Thomas
Start SAR
Bench K9
Start Reef
Bench Kenny

I thought I would answer your question on playmakers behalf

Actually, no.

I'd probably bench Miller and start Thomas/Rahim in the front court.

Outside of Thomas' attitude, he tries. He may not be very good for the most part ... but he tries. His defensive woes aren't from lack of effort, but lack of size.

But, benching Rahim is NOT the reason I dislike Adelman. I've disliked Adelman's approach from about week 2 of the season.
 
playmaker0017 said:
I don't think he forgot, I don't think he ever knew. I think they were a good defensive team due to talent - not due to anything the coach did or tried to get his players to do.

This coach is trying to be the same coach as he was with a different team. This team is NOT that team. It's time for a change.

Is there an easy solution? I don't know. I do know that this coach continually tries to play a brand of basketball not suited to the players at his disposal. I know that instead of confrontation, he takes the easy road and lets the players do what they would like for the most part.

I can't imagine letting bibby lollygag down court and jack up shots 4 seconds into the shot clock with no one under the basket. I'd bench him for a quarter.

You do realize that Artest won't work with every coach.

Again you point out that are coach is incompetant, yet you don't give any plausible guysthat will both suit the needs of team and Artest. Suiting Artest right now has to be our greatest need.
 
Back
Top