Best player on team IMO last year and will be this year, too. Also I will admit to feeling the reason we didn't draft Doncic was because we already had his equivalent in Bogdanovich.It takes awhile to get used to the NBA. His game against Cleveland made me a believer.
He should be healthier and get the style of play a little better this year.
Very strong and tough player. Leadership potential. Humble. Hard worker. Lots of positives and great skills.
Best player on team IMO last year and will be this year, too. Also I will admit to feeling the reason we didn't draft Doncic was because we already had his equivalent in Bogdanovich.
Best player on team IMO last year and will be this year, too. Also I will admit to feeling the reason we didn't draft Doncic was because we already had his equivalent in Bogdanovich.
I really don't know why the fanbase is not more fired up about this guy. He's a joy to watch and I love it when the ball is in his hands in the clutch. Scored a game-winner over Draymond iirc.
After being disappointed year after year, I think all fans have been realistic in their expectations of our players. Bogdan is not getting a lot of hype because he had an average year. Not good, not bad, but average. Bogdan was also a 25yearold rookie. At the end of the day, age plays a gigantic role in ceiling. He'll be 26yearsold coming up this season. That's the same age as Kyrie Irving, Harrison Barnes, Tobias Harris, Evan Fournier, etc. At this age, all of those guys are proven NBA starters who are in the top 10 at their positions.I really don't know why the fanbase is not more fired up about this guy. He's a joy to watch and I love it when the ball is in his hands in the clutch. Scored a game-winner over Draymond iirc.
His stats were better than "average" for a rookie, regardless of age. His shooting splits were fantastic. For comparison Manu Ginobli averaged 7 ppg 2 reb 2 AST shooting 43% from the field, 34% from 3 and 73% from the line as a 25 year old rookie. Also you may say he is a solid starter on a good team(which I tend to agree with), that makes him the only player on the current roster who can say that. Fox, Bagley, Giles may have higher ceilings but potential is just a word. Until they prove it on the court and in their work ethic it's all just a figment of your imagination.After being disappointed year after year, I think all fans have been realistic in their expectations of our players. Bogdan is not getting a lot of hype because he had an average year. Not good, not bad, but average. Bogdan was also a 25yearold rookie. At the end of the day, age plays a gigantic role in ceiling. He'll be 26yearsold coming up this season. That's the same age as Kyrie Irving, Harrison Barnes, Tobias Harris, Evan Fournier, etc. At this age, all of those guys are proven NBA starters who are in the top 10 at their positions.
Basically he's an older player on this young team. He had an average rookie year. He doesn't show a particularly high ceiling.
Fans are excited about him, but he's probably at best, a solid starter on a good team. That's not worth getting fired up over. Whereas Fox, Bagley, and the others have much higher ceilings and could potentially shape our entire franchise. Bogdan isn't a franchise changer. I actually think he gets a lot of love by fans in general though. Just not the same hype.
Age is very relevant in this discussion though. He had an average year. Manu is a gigantic outlier because he's a future HOF who has now played into his 40s. That would be very hard for Bogdan to replicate. Manu is also a lot more athletic than Bogdan is.His stats were better than "average" for a rookie, regardless of age. His shooting splits were fantastic. For comparison Manu Ginobli averaged 7 ppg 2 reb 2 AST shooting 43% from the field, 34% from 3 and 73% from the line as a 25 year old rookie.
Definitely disagree on the average label. He played well despite a bad squad without anyone resembling a star player next to him. He also was noticed by coaches on King's opponents as its best player (ask Pop for example). He most importantly drew opposing teams best defensive players, unlike buddy hield who primarily came off the bench and faced opponents 2nd team. Not bashing Hield, just stating fact.After being disappointed year after year, I think all fans have been realistic in their expectations of our players. Bogdan is not getting a lot of hype because he had an average year. Not good, not bad, but average. Bogdan was also a 25yearold rookie. At the end of the day, age plays a gigantic role in ceiling. He'll be 26yearsold coming up this season. That's the same age as Kyrie Irving, Harrison Barnes, Tobias Harris, Evan Fournier, etc. At this age, all of those guys are proven NBA starters who are in the top 10 at their positions.
Basically he's an older player on this young team. He had an average rookie year. He doesn't show a particularly high ceiling.
Fans are excited about him, but he's probably at best, a solid starter on a good team. That's not worth getting fired up over. Whereas Fox, Bagley, and the others have much higher ceilings and could potentially shape our entire franchise. Bogdan isn't a franchise changer. I actually think he gets a lot of love by fans in general though. Just not the same hype.
When's the last time young Kings players hit their top potential? I think you're underestimating how hard it is to find a player who can at the very least be a good starter at his position for the next 5-7 years. You're just assuming every Kings young player is gonna magically hit their ceiling when in actuality there's probably a rather small probability they every reach what you have envisioned in your head. The Kings have had a total of four all star players over the last 20 years(C Webb, Peja, Brad Miller, Boogie). That's it.Age is very relevant in this discussion though. He had an average year. Manu is a gigantic outlier because he's a future HOF who has now played into his 40s. That would be very hard for Bogdan to replicate. Manu is also a lot more athletic than Bogdan is.
I think Bogdan can be a good player for us, but I think he caps out at average.
Actually, there have been quite a few players coming over from Europe at age 25 who started putting up really good numbers in their 3rd seasons (age 27). It is always amazing how much more you improve when you compete against the best.Age is very relevant in this discussion though. He had an average year. Manu is a gigantic outlier because he's a future HOF who has now played into his 40s. That would be very hard for Bogdan to replicate. Manu is also a lot more athletic than Bogdan is.
I think Bogdan can be a good player for us, but I think he caps out at average.
After being disappointed year after year, I think all fans have been realistic in their expectations of our players. Bogdan is not getting a lot of hype because he had an average year. Not good, not bad, but average. Bogdan was also a 25yearold rookie. At the end of the day, age plays a gigantic role in ceiling. He'll be 26yearsold coming up this season. That's the same age as Kyrie Irving, Harrison Barnes, Tobias Harris, Evan Fournier, etc. At this age, all of those guys are proven NBA starters who are in the top 10 at their positions.
Basically he's an older player on this young team. He had an average rookie year. He doesn't show a particularly high ceiling.
Fans are excited about him, but he's probably at best, a solid starter on a good team. That's not worth getting fired up over. Whereas Fox, Bagley, and the others have much higher ceilings and could potentially shape our entire franchise. Bogdan isn't a franchise changer. I actually think he gets a lot of love by fans in general though. Just not the same hype.
With the off season to work on his game and rest his body he should see improvement. He was after all a NBA Rookie last season. The league had a chance to watch tape and adjust to his game. Now he has had a chance to adjust his game and come back for season 2. I think his assist numbers and scoring will go up. Hopefully Bogdan will get more looks from the 3 point line as well as Buddy and the rest of the Kings.
Can he play the three on a full term basis with that 7 ft wingspan? They IMO were misguidingly pursuing LaVine this summer, but with the notion that he possibly could (unless they thought he’d come off the bench too). LaVine is even more of a SG
I’ve wanted the teams current best two players in Buddy/Bogdan starting together for aeons. Stats say our best lineups were with them (see SactownRoyalty ‘Wee Three Kings’). Buddy is starting quality and won’t want to come off the bench for his career IMO
I think this season we see if he can play some three. His athleticism might serve him better there on both sides of the ball IMO anyways
Age is very relevant in this discussion though. He had an average year. Manu is a gigantic outlier because he's a future HOF who has now played into his 40s. That would be very hard for Bogdan to replicate. Manu is also a lot more athletic than Bogdan is.
I think Bogdan can be a good player for us, but I think he caps out at average.
12ppg 3 rb 3 assists 40% from the 3 in 28mpg is pretttty solid.
Hes a foundation player that is very important to the teams future success. Its not like 25 is old (still a couple years away from his prime), sure his ceiling isnt as high but 15 to 17 ppg would be fire. I barely remember the last.time I could say at least we got this guy thats legit consistent. Also, he was playing with zero summer rest which gassed him prolly.
One thing is for sure, he is better than his little cousin.