I didn't say he did. The quote was he couldn't coach talent. He was able to do a better job of it than Kerr in GS.He was handed an already rolling freight train. He didn't implement anything new. Clearly.
I didn't say he did. The quote was he couldn't coach talent. He was able to do a better job of it than Kerr in GS.He was handed an already rolling freight train. He didn't implement anything new. Clearly.
I didn't say he did. The quote was he couldn't coach talent. He was able to do a better job of it than Kerr in GS.
Walton was running the second slowest offense in the league until Vivek had to get in his ear to pick up the pace. Players shuffling in and out has nothing to do with it. Running the second slowest offense with Fox as your QB makes zero sense. Running the second slowest offense with CoJo as your PG makes good sense. Gearing your offense away from your star player and toward a backup PG is insanely stupid IMO.
I don't think the Lakers have anything to do with it. What did Walton accomplish to earn himself such a long term deal here? His resume was as weak as it gets and Vlade acted as if he had found a gold mine when he hired him.
I thought Joerger playing ZBo ball during Fox's rookie year was a fireable offense as well. An entire year was wasted on that. Fox could have came out of the gate more like Ja Morant, but instead he wasn't able to use nearly any of the tools that got him to the NBA and a lot of development time was wasted there. Second year, Joerger played to his strengths and all the sudden the wins started piling up. Maybe the same will happen with Walton but my question is, why are we throwing away entire seasons on what amounts to nothing other than coaches being stubborn with their philosophies?
I feel dirty saying it but I kind of like LaMelo as a prospect this year. Lavar has been relatively quiet since Lonzo has been moved out of the spotlight in LA. I’m wondering what distractions he’d bring if the Kings took LaMelo knowing we’re not a big market either.
Now why am I bringing this up here? I feel like LaMelo is off our draft board as long as we have Luke Walton as our coach considering the comments Lavar has made about Walton.
Having a coach that limits the prospects we can draft (especially when they are looked at as a top prospect) should be a factor in retaining that said coach. Now just because it's a factor it doesn't mean it should be the entire reason behind getting rid of a coach, but again it's something that should at least weigh into the decision (however big or small that weight may be).???
Not sure, even with your explanation, why this is in the coaching candidate thread. ;0
Having a coach that limits the prospects we can draft (especially when they are looked at as a top prospect) should be a factor in retaining that said coach. Now just because it's a factor it doesn't mean it should be the entire reason behind getting rid of a coach, but again it's something that should at least weigh into the decision (however big or small that weight may be).
No, that’s a gross misrepresentation of what I said.So, to paraphrase, since you want us to look at LaMelo - and Luke purportedly doesn't like LaMelo - Luke would not be the best coaching candidate and, in fact, needs to go?
Again, where did I say Walton “has to go?”Attempt #2: So you want us to look at LaMelo but Lavar (LaMelo's dad) HATES Luke Walton so Walton has to go or our chances of getting LaMelo decrease?
Again, where did I say Walton “has to go?”
You’re trying to back me into this black or white stance when I’m firmly in the gray.