Bee: Too often they were drama Kings

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/159373.html

Too often they were drama Kings
Distractions were plentiful, players say
By Sam Amick - Bee Staff Writer
Last Updated 12:24 am PDT Sunday, April 22, 2007


Want the best gauge on how disappointing and drama-filled this Kings season actually was? Don't listen to fans or the media. Listen to the people who really know.

Corliss Williamson put it at the top of his personal list in terms of dysfunction, this from a 12-year veteran whose Kings teams were a combined 100-146 in his first three seasons. John Salmons sometimes marveled at how there was always some distraction in the works, and he hails from the NBA soap opera capital of Philadelphia. Don't believe us yet? Shareef Abdur-Rahim -- who came to town in 2005 having played on nine previous losing teams -- said he can't remember so many players being unhappy with how they were used.

Defense attorneys made more noise than the Kings' defense. The sales job that landed coach Eric Musselman the job was an aberration, with his team unable to close so many deals when it came to close games. And when all seemed lost, they even failed at failing, losing 49 games instead of 50 when just one more defeat would have brought much more promise for a top-tier draft pick.

"When it's a tough year like this, everything gets involved," Kings center Brad Miller said. "A lot of things never get shown on the court or come out."

You mean there was more? Oh, good gracious, let's get the grades over with.

Shareef Abdur-Rahim

9.9 ppg • 5.0 rpg • 1.4 apg

C-

He's a low-post scorer who doesn't rebound the way he used to because of Father Time, except that his inconsistent offensive role meant he was often no more than the guy watching everyone else shoot. He very well might be gone by next season, as the Kings are looking to get younger and more athletic all around.

Ron Artest

18.8 ppg • 6.5 rpg • 3.4 apg

C+

The reality that Artest played his best basketball in the second half did little to affect the record, but it was significant as a much-needed precursor to his possible exit. Basketball president Geoff Petrie can now flaunt the career-high numbers to potential suitors as a counter to the off-the-court concerns.

Mike Bibby

17.1 ppg • 3.2 rpg • 4.7 apg

D+

Once every couple of weeks, the Bibby of old would return to his sharpshooting, duck-dance ways. As former coach Eric Musselman said early on, Bibby missing shots was like Dennis Rodman not rebounding. Bibby will surely be on the trading block, but Petrie showed in February that he'll be stubborn about receiving both quality and quantity in return.

Quincy Douby

2.8 ppg • 0.9 rpg • 0.4 apg

C

The flashes of potency and the playing time were minimal, as Douby was never able to pass second-year point guard Ronnie Price on the depth chart.

Francisco García

6.0 ppg • 2.6 rpg • 1.1 apg

B-

What García did in the final weeks was no small development, as the 2005 draft pick reminded the organization that he can be a legitimate part of the future. And, of course, it showed management that he should've been used more by Musselman earlier.

Kevin Martin


20.2 ppg • 4.3 rpg • 2.2 apg

B+

The lesser-discussed aspect of his breakout season was the surroundings in which it took place. Playing with many veterans who were either known as lifelong scorers or wanted to add that aspect to their repertoire, Martin still led the team in scoring. He maintained his production after opponents keyed in but admits he must spend the offseason focusing on becoming more well-rounded.

Brad Miller

9.0 ppg • 6.4 rpg • 3.6 apg

D+

Like it or not, a player such as Miller -- especially at this point in his career -- requires special handling. He can be special and very complementary if put in the right positions. Or, as was the case this season, he can be a relative non-factor and defensive liability. Already slow afoot, Miller struggled with a foot injury.

Vitaly Potapenko

0.0 ppg • 0.7 rpg • 0.0 apg

INCOMPLETE.

The most significant contribution from the "Ukraine Train" will come in July, when his $3.6 million salary comes off the books.

Ronnie Price

3.3 ppg • 1.2 rpg • 0.8 apg

B-

Those who know say Price has shown he has a spot in the league, although defining that role might take more court time. He is not a true point guard and undersized for a shooting guard. But the free-agent-to-be has scoring punch and athleticism, work ethic and defensive instincts that are valuable.

John Salmons

8.5 ppg • 3.3 rpg • 3.2 apg

C+

The versatility was a constant and most valuable on defense, where Salmons was able to guard everyone from speedy point guards to athletic forwards. But the idea of him running the point never worked as well as the higher-ups hoped, and Salmons' one-on-one play and tendency to pound the ball were part of the overall lack of ball movement.

Kenny Thomas

5.3 ppg • 6.1 rpg • 1.2 apg

D+

Herein lies the most ironic of situations this season. Thomas was told early to focus on rebounding and defending, the sort of role-defining other players would later say needed to happen more. But in limiting Thomas' game, he had little impact for someone who had spent his career providing some offense down low and with a mid-range jumper. It should be a reminder that he can provide easy baskets when the defense is focused elsewhere.

Justin Williams

5.0 ppg • 4.4 rpg • 0.1 apg

B+

If there was one team in the league that should have experimented more with a wild-card rookie such as this, it was the Kings. They couldn't rebound or defend, both of which are Williams' specialties. He will be a free agent they'd like to keep, if only because he finished with an average of 16.5 rebounds per 48 minutes.

Corliss Williamson


9.1 ppg • 3.3 rpg • 0.6 apg

B

The "Big Nasty" was the feel-good story of the season, the Kings fans' favorite reviving his career by producing off the bench. His impact in the second half slipped, but he surely has earned a multiyear deal somewhere as he nears free agency.

Coaching


D

The Xs and Os weren't good enough, and Eric Musselman's handling of everyone -- players and beyond -- left much to be desired and hardly qualified as leadership. Throw in public relations disasters like the DUI incident and subsequent skipping of community service, and it becomes quite clear why team co-owners Joe and Gavin Maloof paid more than $5 million for him to go away. Musselman wowed the Maloofs to earn the job, but he fell out of favor with Petrie, which led to his firing.

Front office


D

First things first. Let's get some teamwork going in those ivory towers. The hiring of Musselman was the wrong kind of collaborative effort, with the Maloofs pushing for then-Monarchs coach John Whisenant and Petrie suddenly endorsing Musselman in what might have been a rushed attempt to knock Whisenant out of the running. However, no one bothered to call Musselman's former boss, Chris Mullin, to ask the Golden State executive about the coach whose tenure there certainly didn't lack controversy. I-told-you-sos would be in order, but Mullin never had a chance to tell them.
 
What these grades show me is not much, although I generally agree with them. If Artest gets a C+ and Bibby a D+ guess which one should should be first on the chopping block? Of course, it's well known that the Kings have been desperately shopping Bibby for some time. I would prefer to keep on the court valuable Ron-Ron with all his baggage and risk than live with an ever slower and inconsistent Bibby eating up $13.5 million next season and $14.5 mil his final year.
 
What these grades show me is not much, although I generally agree with them. If Artest gets a C+ and Bibby a D+ guess which one should should be first on the chopping block? Of course, it's well known that the Kings have been desperately shopping Bibby for some time. I would prefer to keep on the court valuable Ron-Ron with all his baggage and risk than live with an ever slower and inconsistent Bibby eating up $13.5 million next season and $14.5 mil his final year.

In all fairness, I think you have to recognize that Mike was playing through nagging injuries practically all season. From the thumb/wrist at the beginning of the year, to the ankle/foot problem and then to back spasms, Mike just didn't have a good season. I think we finally spotted the old Bibby at the end...

Ron-Ron is still ticking. I think a major key to his future with the Kings will be who is selected as the next head coach.
 
No pictures, no themes, no analysis -- I prefer Brick's grades. The Kings miss the playoffs and mess up their draft position and not a single F? I'm sorry too soft.
 

Kevin Martin


20.2 ppg • 4.3 rpg • 2.2 apg

B+

The lesser-discussed aspect of his breakout season was the surroundings in which it took place. Playing with many veterans who were either known as lifelong scorers or wanted to add that aspect to their repertoire, Martin still led the team in scoring. He maintained his production after opponents keyed in but admits he must spend the offseason focusing on becoming more well-rounded.

This guy's a front runner for MIP and they give him a B+? Two words: Smoke, and Crack.
 
Last edited:
In all fairness, I think you have to recognize that Mike was playing through nagging injuries practically all season. From the thumb/wrist at the beginning of the year, to the ankle/foot problem and then to back spasms, Mike just didn't have a good season. I think we finally spotted the old Bibby at the end...

Injuries did not affect Mike's shot selection, nor did it affect the fact that he should have been more of a facilitator than a scorer.

Mike has to go before Ron.
 
In all fairness, I think you have to recognize that Mike was playing through nagging injuries practically all season. From the thumb/wrist at the beginning of the year, to the ankle/foot problem and then to back spasms, Mike just didn't have a good season. I think we finally spotted the old Bibby at the end...

My problem with Mike is that he too desperately(pride/contract??) wanted to play all 82 games. I think his wrist injury at the beginning of the season warranted some time off to heal, and by not taking that necessary time to heal, I think he ruined his whole season and consequently hurt the Kings more than he helped them (in the long run).

But the blame shouldn't probably be put solely on Mike, but also on the coaching staff, but hey, Mike was in Musselman's powerpoint, so he had to play, right?:o
 
Trade Bibby and draft Mike Conley jr. and sign Steve Blake as a free agent and have Blake start and let price and conley develop as the backup.
 
If we keep Ron and trade Bibby, my disappointment over this season will be even greater. Even more than I hated losing, I HATED all the "drama" that went on this season.

As far as trades go - our focus needs to be on the power foward position. What we have now STINKS. Our guards are the least of our worries. Fix our front court positions first.
 
Trade Bibby and draft Mike Conley jr. and sign Steve Blake as a free agent and have Blake start and let price and conley develop as the backup.

I'd like to get back to discussing the grades. We already have about a gazillion threads on trade possibilities.

-------------------------------------------------------

HighFlyingMonkey said:
Injuries did not affect Mike's shot selection, nor did it affect the fact that he should have been more of a facilitator than a scorer.

Mike has to go before Ron.

Hey, I'm not arguing that this was a horrible year but it wasn't like it would have been much better without Mike.

It's a team sport, remember? And the whole team contributed in various ways to the suckitude. I think the main thing is to focus on getting a decent big man and then seeing if he's the type (like Webber) that can run the pick and roll to perfection with someone like Mike Bibby. If he is, we'd be flat out crazy to get rid of Mike. Saying Mike has to go before anyone or even has to go at all just doesn't address the whole picture, IMHO.
 
It's a team sport, remember? And the whole team contributed in various ways to the suckitude. I think the main thing is to focus on getting a decent big man and then seeing if he's the type (like Webber) that can run the pick and roll to perfection with someone like Mike Bibby. If he is, we'd be flat out crazy to get rid of Mike. Saying Mike has to go before anyone or even has to go at all just doesn't address the whole picture, IMHO.


I agree. Everybody loves to focus on how Mike hasn't played as well in recent seasons, but seem to forget that prior to last year he was playing in a system that allowed him to do what he does best .. get the ball where he's open & make the shot. It's a lot easier to look like a superstar when you have Webb, (and Christie and Vlade) giving you the ball where you want it. Mike Bibby is still a very talented player, he's just needs to be in a system that works for him, and if we can create that here, all the better.
 
Amick: C-

While producing a column which was not inaccurate, gave little detail, said nothing original, and said it rather boringly. Timid: was unwilling to give a grade lower than a D or higher than a B+. Overall, came across as an inferior knockoff of a Bricklayer piece.
 
Amick: C-

While producing a column which was not inaccurate, gave little detail, said nothing original, and said it rather boringly. Timid: was unwilling to give a grade lower than a D or higher than a B+. Overall, came across as an inferior knockoff of a Bricklayer piece.

Word!!

:D
 
Actually, I find these grades to be kind of interesting, just in who they are coming from and tone. I was generally dissatisfied with Amick during the latter half of the season where, whether it be by choice or by direction form above, he appeared to make a choice to be a rah rah guy and ignore the obvious in a season screaming out for another approach. And when he did change tone it was often jarring.

Well, these grades, glaring lack of Fs or whatnot, were definitely that change of tone, and hinting at alot of stuff fra darker than anything that Sam, as the beat reporter, was ever going to admit during the season. Rem midseasonw hen he was giving everyboyd Bs? Compare to these.
 
Actually, I find these grades to be kind of interesting, just in who they are coming from and tone. I was generally dissatisfied with Amick during the latter half of the season where, whether it be by choice or by direction form above, he appeared to make a choice to be a rah rah guy and ignore the obvious in a season screaming out for another approach. And when he did change tone it was often jarring.

Well, these grades, glaring lack of Fs or whatnot, were definitely that change of tone, and hinting at alot of stuff fra darker than anything that Sam, as the beat reporter, was ever going to admit during the season. Rem midseasonw hen he was giving everyboyd Bs? Compare to these.

I agree, I feel like the Bee writers like to hint that they have inside information or they know the opinion of the front office on something without actually saying it outright or reporting on actual conversations. So what you end up getting is the kind of reportage and analysis that just about anybody paying attention to the franchise could come up with, reflected in the fact that this board scoops the Bee approximately 90% of the time. These grades, if anything, show how Amick and others seem to be holding back info.

The point of the newspaper could be to deliver inside information or analysis that none of us here could come up with, but too often I don't think that happens. The Bee can't seem to find a middle ground between the rah rah stuff and the outright petty, ridiculous hatchet jobs. I know the reporters have to balance access and sources with producing good articles, but just give us the dish!!
 
I'd like to get back to discussing the grades. We already have about a gazillion threads on trade possibilities.

-------------------------------------------------------



Hey, I'm not arguing that this was a horrible year but it wasn't like it would have been much better without Mike.

It's a team sport, remember? And the whole team contributed in various ways to the suckitude. I think the main thing is to focus on getting a decent big man and then seeing if he's the type (like Webber) that can run the pick and roll to perfection with someone like Mike Bibby. If he is, we'd be flat out crazy to get rid of Mike. Saying Mike has to go before anyone or even has to go at all just doesn't address the whole picture, IMHO.
But that would depend on the age of that big as well. If you are somehow lucky and getting a legit young PF to build around then Mike is just a stop gap solution. At his age, he is not going to be here in th elong run when we should be contending. So why not trade him while he still has some good value and go completely young. Have a young core that will take you somewhere and surround them by solid veterans who will help them develop and set an example of how to prepare (eg Corliss).
 
But that would depend on the age of that big as well. If you are somehow lucky and getting a legit young PF to build around then Mike is just a stop gap solution. At his age, he is not going to be here in th elong run when we should be contending. So why not trade him while he still has some good value and go completely young. Have a young core that will take you somewhere and surround them by solid veterans who will help them develop and set an example of how to prepare (eg Corliss).

I didn't say don't trade him. I was disagreeing with the comment that Mike should go first...especially before we get a chance at whatever talent is available at #10.
 
I agree. Everybody loves to focus on how Mike hasn't played as well in recent seasons, but seem to forget that prior to last year he was playing in a system that allowed him to do what he does best .. get the ball where he's open & make the shot. It's a lot easier to look like a superstar when you have Webb, (and Christie and Vlade) giving you the ball where you want it. Mike Bibby is still a very talented player, he's just needs to be in a system that works for him, and if we can create that here, all the better.

my feeling is that the front office would rather trade mike than put the necessary pieces and system in place to accomodate him. it's just easier for them to trade the one guy, than to find the right big man and the right coach, and then instill the right mindset.
 
What these grades show me is not much, although I generally agree with them. If Artest gets a C+ and Bibby a D+ guess which one should should be first on the chopping block? Of course, it's well known that the Kings have been desperately shopping Bibby for some time. I would prefer to keep on the court valuable Ron-Ron with all his baggage and risk than live with an ever slower and inconsistent Bibby eating up $13.5 million next season and $14.5 mil his final year.

I thought the Bee didn't connect the dots very well: Artest was the main reason behind the drama. Artest's baggage overwhelmes his talent. It will be very interesting to see what the Kings get in return for Artest. We will then be able to get some clue as to the "risk factor" that other teams attribute to him. We certainly aren't getting back a top-20 player in the league, that's for sure.
 
I thought the Bee didn't connect the dots very well: Artest was the main reason behind the drama. Artest's baggage overwhelmes his talent. It will be very interesting to see what the Kings get in return for Artest. We will then be able to get some clue as to the "risk factor" that other teams attribute to him. We certainly aren't getting back a top-20 player in the league, that's for sure.

It sounds like you've already pulled the trigger on an Artest trade. I still say the Kings are more likely to trade an aging fast Bibby than a top of his game Artest - although letting both go would not surprise me in a "blow it up" summer. Because the Maloof's already had to swallow hard and admit they blew it with Musselman, I don't think they're eager to admit defeat again by showing Artest the door unless top value is there in return.
 
Back
Top