Bee: Drive for arena gets new point man

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#1
http://www.sacbee.com/351/story/93891.html

Drive for arena gets new point man
Financier John Moag answers NBA's call to help broker a deal.
By Jon Ortiz and Terri Hardy - Bee Staff Writers
Last Updated 12:23 am PST Sunday, December 17, 2006
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1

So the quest for a new arena in Sacramento has come to this: An East Coast sports financier holding court at a downtown lobbying firm with a who's who of regional power brokers, apologizing, listening, taking copious notes and a few cigar breaks.

John Moag, who honed his negotiating skills inside Washington's Beltway before moving to the sports world, is taking the point position for David Stern as the NBA commissioner puts his stature and reputation behind brokering a deal to build a new home for the Kings.

"We needed someone with experience on building matters, on financing matters," Stern said. "And because he was head of a stadium authority, he brought a background I don't possess."

Moag, 52, takes on a task that has defied some of the region's most popular political leaders. They endured on-again, off-again talks with the Maloof family, owners of the Kings, before receiving a sound thumping from voters who opposed a sales-tax funding plan on the November ballot.

While Stern's point man hasn't single-handedly pulled off a high-profile coup in years, that doesn't mean he's not up to it. People in Maryland like the chances for the man whose gravelly voice wooed Art Modell into moving the Cleveland Browns to Baltimore in 1995. In Pasadena, though, frustration lingers because Moag didn't deliver an NFL team for the Rose Bowl.

So far, Sacramento-area leaders say they have been impressed by Moag's ability to peg the major players in town, grasp the vexing politics of the issue and absorb how hard it is to get public money for an arena project in California. Some discussions examined whether California could establish a statewide sports authority or a multi-county approach to building an arena.

Two weeks ago, Moag had ruffled the feathers of local civic leaders when he described the arena effort to date as "a little rudderless." But he recovered quickly, soothing tensions and earning glowing reviews from local leaders for his smarts, intensity and listening skills.

Jeff Raimundo, a political consultant whose Sacramento firm in 2004 worked on a plan to privately fund an arena, said Moag did a lot to calm fears that Stern's involvement was simply a prelude to moving the Kings to another city.

"This was not for show," Raimundo said. "Stern wouldn't have brought someone like Moag here if they intended to blow Sacramento off."

Moag declined to sit down with The Bee but answered a few questions by e-mail. If history is any indication, though, he can help keep a team in town -- or help it move.

"He's done both. I would be surprised if he's not looking at outside options to Sacramento right now," said Dennis Coates, a professor of economics at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, who has met Moag and followed his career. "He'd be crazy if he didn't do that. To get these deals done, it helps to have an alternative. He knows that."

John Andrew Moag Jr. has ties to sports and business that go back to when his family lived near Baltimore's Memorial Stadium. As a youngster, he parked cars in their yard during Colts football games.

After graduating from Washington College, he took a $25-a-day job driving Steny Hoyer, who was campaigning to become Maryland's next lieutenant governor. Hoyer lost, but the Maryland Democrat subsequently won a seat in Congress in 1981. Moag became his key aide on the powerful House Appropriations Committee. (Hoyer is the incoming House majority leader.)

Moag left Hoyer's staff six years later to become the youngest partner in the history of Patton Boggs LLP, a top D.C. law firm. While there, he negotiated a deal that moved the Hartford, Conn., Whalers hockey team into a new arena in Raleigh, N.C.

In 1995, Maryland Gov. Parris Glendening appointed Moag as chairman of the Maryland Stadium Authority, a body with power to negotiate leases, condemn land and build public projects. The new job came with no pay and a mandate to do something that had stymied the state for a decade.

"The Colts had literally packed up Mayflower vans in the middle of the night and left for Indianapolis 11 years earlier. Baltimore was still hurting over that," said Bruce Hoffman, the stadium authority's executive director during Moag's chairmanship. "John's primary job was to return the NFL to Baltimore."

At the time, Cleveland Browns owner Art Modell was in off-and-on talks with Cleveland about updating 63-year-old Cleveland Stadium and still had three years on his lease. After months of secret talks, Moag offered rent-free use of a yet-to-be-built stadium; money from tickets, parking and concessions; and $75 million in moving expenses.

The two men signed the deal in a private jet on the tarmac at Baltimore-Washington International Airport in October 1995.

"Less than a dozen people in Maryland knew about it. I found out 30 minutes after the deal was done," Hoffman said. "We couldn't say a word because the people of Cleveland didn't know about it. The Browns still had games to play there."

When news of the deal eventually surfaced, Cleveland Mayor Michael White blasted Modell and Moag: "Art Modell and John Moag got together one day, got together on a secret runway, with a secret handshake and a secret knock and a secret deal. Then they conspired to break our lease and steal our team."

Cleveland officials reached for comment last week, including White, declined to talk about Moag or the Browns' move.

With his reputation as a deal maker and sports financier burnished, Moag resigned his public post and left Patton Boggs in 1999 to open a sports industry division for Baltimore-based media and entertainment investment firm Legg Mason Wood Walker Inc.

Two years later he started his own sports finance consulting firm, Moag & Co. The company's Web site posts a current client list that includes someone looking to buy an NBA franchise. Moag said he couldn't discuss the client's identity but added: "It has nothing to do with Sacramento."

After the defeat of Sacramento's arena sales tax, Stern, in an unusual move, took over as the arena negotiator for the owners of the Kings and turned to Moag.

He doesn't shy away from challenging projects, as evidenced by his coup in stealing the Brownsand his willingness to sort through Sacramento's quagmire.

But not all of his projects turn out successfully.

Moag was hired in 2002 by the company that manages the Rose Bowl to bring an NFL team to Pasadena. That effort ended this year, after a host of setbacks, including a City Council decision to pull out in 2005. A citywide referendum on the November ballot, which would have charged leaders with continuing the effort, was overwhelmingly rejected.

Moag failed to deliver on promises that the process would be quick and Pasadena would have exclusive bidding rights, said Mayor Bill Bogaard. The city ending up competing with Los Angeles, Anaheim and Carson.

"I would say Mr. Moag's advice to the Rose Bowl Operating Company was optimistic and turned out not to be achievable at all," Bogaard said.

At the time, the San Gabriel Valley Tribune reported Moag as saying the league's decision to consider the Carson proposal had "purposely and intentionally blindsided us."

"I get upset when I lose," Moag told the Tribune.

Moag would not discuss the Rose Bowl deal or any of his previous efforts with The Bee, saying the questions "bear no relevance to the Kings and Sacramento."

Chris Holden, a member of the Pasadena City Council, said Moag did everything possible to bring the NFL to the city.

"He was able to quickly understand the dynamics of the community," Holden said. "He understood where the obstacles were and tried to minimize and eliminate them."

For instance, Moag saw that the community would be concerned about altering the Rose Bowl, so he hired a "world class preservation organization" to help with design, Holden said.

"It was a very frustrating experience," Holden said. "Moag was brought on to be part of the solution, and then the council flipped ... and didn't want to do business with the NFL."

Holden said he believes time killed the proposal: "When a deal drags on for too long, it starts to weaken the foundation."

In Sacramento, Moag arrives on the scene after local politicians and business leaders have been talking about a new arena for six years.

About the writer: The Bee's Jon Ortiz can be reached at (916) 321-1043 or jortiz@sacbee.com.
 
#2
Two weeks ago, Moag had ruffled the feathers of local civic leaders when he described the arena effort to date as "a little rudderless." But he recovered quickly, soothing tensions and earning glowing reviews from local leaders for his smarts, intensity and listening skills.
As to the "ruffled feathers," tough cookies, because its true. And I'd even say it was a more tactful choice of words than many might use.

The second part is encouraging. He may or may not succeed, and I hope he does, but at least I feel like we finally have someone who has an excellent background and the skills needed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#3
I'm not as encouraged as you are, Kennadog

I had to re-read this article a few times... Sounds like Moag is just as good (if not better) at moving teams as he is at keeping them from moving.

I think a valid thing for the Maloofs to do here is to put together a Plan B that involves some other City, so the reality of the team moving is more concrete than some sort of "They may have to move" argument. Maybe Moag is just the guy to assemble such a proposal, to "scare" us into action.

At the same time, however, it seems unlikely that any such threat is highly unlikely to reverse an 80-20 defeat and turn it into a 50% + 1, or a 2/3 majority (if it's a specific tax increase), victory.

Moag is the right guy to try this, but he's even better when you're trying to move a team. Just go over the high points in the article, see what Moag has accomplished, and I think you can see he could run this either way. He's a broker, not a Kings in Sacramento proponent. Trying to get the best deal for his clients. If "best deal" means he gets the Kings to stay, he'll figure out a way. But if "best deal" means Anaheim, well, then, that's what he'll try for.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#4
I had to re-read this article a few times... Sounds like Moag is just as good (if not better) at moving teams as he is at keeping them from moving.

I think a valid thing for the Maloofs to do here is to put together a Plan B that involves some other City, so the reality of the team moving is more concrete than some sort of "They may have to move" argument. Maybe Moag is just the guy to assemble such a proposal, to "scare" us into action.

At the same time, however, it seems unlikely that any such threat is highly unlikely to reverse an 80-20 defeat and turn it into a 50% + 1, or a 2/3 majority (if it's a specific tax increase), victory.

Moag is the right guy to try this, but he's even better when you're trying to move a team. Just go over the high points in the article, see what Moag has accomplished, and I think you can see he could run this either way. He's a broker, not a Kings in Sacramento proponent. Trying to get the best deal for his clients. If "best deal" means he gets the Kings to stay, he'll figure out a way. But if "best deal" means Anaheim, well, then, that's what he'll try for.
wow. What a shocker. You're not optimistic.

I think you're intentionally looking for whatever dark lining you can find for the silver cloud.

David Stern has said numerous times he wants to do everything possible to find a way to keep the Kings in Sacramento. And now John Moag is here to attempt to find a solution that will work for all concerned. That's reason for hope.

Jeff Raimundo, a political consultant whose Sacramento firm in 2004 worked on a plan to privately fund an arena, said Moag did a lot to calm fears that Stern's involvement was simply a prelude to moving the Kings to another city.

"This was not for show," Raimundo said. "Stern wouldn't have brought someone like Moag here if they intended to blow Sacramento off."
I think that is pretty clear and personally I'm going to give a little more credibility to the guy from Sacramento who actually knows the situation, the people involved, etc.

If, in the end, they cannot find a way to broker some kind of deal then I think we all know the real possibility of the Kings moving. But at this point to make it sound as though Moag has some kind of hidden agenda is erroneous IMHO.
 
#5
(if it's a specific tax increase
Of course they will move if they can't get an arena in this region. Nobody needs to state the obvious. At this point that is a "duh." But I absolutely believe Stern sent Moag here to keep the Kings here, if there is any way possible.

As to the part I quoted above, you are trying to beat a dead horse that is already at the glue factory. We had the election without any specific proposal, except for a sales tax increase. It failed big. So what?

Until we see what any new proposal looks like, there is absolutely nothing to debate. And its pointless to keep bringing up a defeated non-proposal. That debate is over, done and gone.
 
#6
I had to re-read this article a few times... Sounds like Moag is just as good (if not better) at moving teams as he is at keeping them from moving.

I think a valid thing for the Maloofs to do here is to put together a Plan B that involves some other City, so the reality of the team moving is more concrete than some sort of "They may have to move" argument. Maybe Moag is just the guy to assemble such a proposal, to "scare" us into action.

At the same time, however, it seems unlikely that any such threat is highly unlikely to reverse an 80-20 defeat and turn it into a 50% + 1, or a 2/3 majority (if it's a specific tax increase), victory.

Moag is the right guy to try this, but he's even better when you're trying to move a team. Just go over the high points in the article, see what Moag has accomplished, and I think you can see he could run this either way. He's a broker, not a Kings in Sacramento proponent. Trying to get the best deal for his clients. If "best deal" means he gets the Kings to stay, he'll figure out a way. But if "best deal" means Anaheim, well, then, that's what he'll try for.
Just out of curiosity, do you just choose not to post on anything related to the Kings and the TEAM, or just feel that you are better served by being one of the few people who are pesimistic and over-analytic of everything dealing with us KEEPING our team? I think I remember you saying at one time that you are a Kings fan, um...right??