Jerryaki
Starter
He's a multi-millionare. What does he care if we pay him $2 mill a year?...If he's sincere about missing coaching, he'd do it for chump change.
ding ding ding, red flag should be up.
He's a multi-millionare. What does he care if we pay him $2 mill a year?...If he's sincere about missing coaching, he'd do it for chump change.
The WORST thing that can hapen right now is to have a coach trying o make the play offs next year.
Larry Brown is by far the best coach the NBA Pacers have ever had - he is a remarkable coach. He is just very gifted. The Kings would be foolish not to at least contact him
I think the best way to get the rebuild going is to bring in Larry Brown short term. Let him get Brad, Kenny and Shareef playing good basketball, so that we can trade them for rebuild pieces.
Not if you are Larry Brown....
Now, you see, I could not disagree with you more. He has a very long history of alienating players -- star players. I just cannot imagine him in the same room as Artest OR Bibby.
I'll go so far as to say that I think Brown is lobbying ANY team for a job, and the Kings are the most obvious team to lobby right now. It could have been any team; Kings seem to have the "last job standing," so Larry has decided to lobby the public to get an interview.
Detroit didn't win that title because of Larry Brown; they won it in SPITE of having Larry Brown.
While there is a connection between wining games and trying to make the play offs, there is a BIG difference between giving young players lots of time and pushing THEM to win and playing vets. Bu hey if the end of the season is in sight and there are not enough L's I'm sure coach Muss could collect a few... unfortunatly probably one or two less than than necessary.So if we start winning games next year, should our new coach (whoever that might be) be fired mid-season? Maybe we could re-hire Muss at that point.
The worst thing that can happen IMO, is to just wait for Kenny Thomas's, Brad Miller's and SAR's contracts to be up. We need to find a way to raise their trade value so we can trade them for youth and really get our rebuild started. Because with those three guys in there, you aren't leaving much room for rebuilding your frontcourt.
Say we draft a big this year. Well then all you have on the rebuild track in terms of our frontcourt is Justin Williams and the draftee. And considering that all of the big guys with real potential are going to go before the #10, then we just won't have that much frontcourt talent developing. Then you are essentially stuck with that crew for the next three years until you can open some roster spots to bring in more talent. If that isn't putting all your eggs in one basket then I don't know what is.
I think the best way to get the rebuild going is to bring in Larry Brown short term. Let him get Brad, Kenny and Shareef playing good basketball, so that we can trade them for rebuild pieces. Then fire his *** and have the assistant or whatever coach you people want to fill in.
A full rebuild, to get us to back on the upswing in the playoffs, is going to take 3-4 years and at least one superstar. So we are in this for the long-haul. First things first: get rid of the undertalented, overinflated contracts that are holding a full rebuild back.
Boy, that's a leap. How on earth can you assume that Brown will be able to perform that herculean task? Special diet? Magic dust?
Come on, BawLa, you and I disagree a lot of times but I can usually at least see where you're coming from. You've made an assumption this time, however, that I simply do not feel can be substantiated in any way, shape or form.
And before you say LB got KT to play adequately in Philadelphia, that was then. This is now. There's no reason to really assume LB could turn back the clock.
Brown coached Bibby. It was one of the few times in his lifetime that Bibby was spotted playing defense. I think it's a hard uphill climb of an argument to say that Detroit - a team without a superstar - won an NBA Championship despite Larry Brown.
Nice thoughts, but I think the rest of the league understand that KT, Miller, and any of about 4 other players can be had "for a song." Teams do not want Brad Miller, period. I think the Kings are stuck with watching the clock run out on at least 5 contracts, and until all those contracts have expired, the Kings have no cap room to bring in a big name.
You always gotta think this way: Who would I trade away to bring in Kenny Thomas? If I was ANY of the other GMs in this league, my answer would be "No one." Not a late second-round pick; nothing.
The Kings are now paying for their "Win Now!" approach of 2002 and 2003. I think in the case of every single one of their overdone contracts -- Artest, Bibby, SAR, KT and Miller -- there's really only one thing they can do: Watch the clock run out.
No one wants Mike Bibby's contract. Can I state it more simply?
Thank goodness Bonzi foolishly turned down the Kings offer. It was preposterous that Petrie made him that offer; it was even dumber that Bonzi declined it.
when was the last time Larry even HAD a year 3? I'm pretty sure that a 70 year old LB is not likely to still be arround to be fired.I had to review this before I answered...
The 2004 Pistons had Billups, Richard Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace, Okur, and Ben Wallace, among others.
That's pretty good. Billups is considered to the the #1 free agent this summer. I think he's pretty darned good. I bet you'd take Billups for Bibby in a heartbeat.
The Laker team they beat had Malone, Kobe, Shaqille, Payton and Derek Fisher. It ain't exactly like the Pistons beat a bunch of stiffs.
I'm really not wild about Brown. The Pistons fired him a year later, in spite of making the Finals.
Do I think it'd be a mistake to talk to Brown? If your team was on the verge of being a conference finalist, I'd say you should consider him. He'd probably work out pretty well in Dallas. But the Kings have at least 5 untradeable players. I think that's a problem. To me, the Kings are a 3+ year project, and Brown has a bad track record if you want that much time out of him.
Bring in Nellie to establish a direction; bring in Brown to get you over the hump, recognizing that if he doesn't get you over the hump in two years, year three is probably going to suck.
BawLa said:If I had to pick a coach that would have the best shot at rehabilitating the image of our "three stooges", and I had to pick between Larry Brown and the rest of the board, I'd take Larry Brown.
See, there's where you and I have to agree to disagree. I don't think Thomas, SAR or Miller can be rehabilitated. Of the three, I would actually hold out the most hope for Brad, for whom we at least know what to expect (when his foot is okay).
And if we're going to agree they can't be salvaged, then the rationale to bring Brown in disappears...like a poof of smoke. Which is what he would most likely do before too long, anyway.
![]()
Nice thoughts, but I think the rest of the league understand that KT, Miller, and any of about 4 other players can be had "for a song." Teams do not want Brad Miller, period. I think the Kings are stuck with watching the clock run out on at least 5 contracts, and until all those contracts have expired, the Kings have no cap room to bring in a big name.
You always gotta think this way: Who would I trade away to bring in Kenny Thomas? If I was ANY of the other GMs in this league, my answer would be "No one." Not a late second-round pick; nothing.
The Kings are now paying for their "Win Now!" approach of 2002 and 2003. I think in the case of every single one of their overdone contracts -- Artest, Bibby, SAR, KT and Miller -- there's really only one thing they can do: Watch the clock run out.
No one wants Mike Bibby's contract. Can I state it more simply?
Thank goodness Bonzi foolishly turned down the Kings offer. It was preposterous that Petrie made him that offer; it was even dumber that Bonzi declined it.
I do agree that given their contracts, Kenny Thomas and Brad Miller have essentially no NBA value. The one positive is that Brad is unselfish and can be a decent teammate if his body/play doesn't continue to deteriorate. I keep saying it, but I think the Kings should just cut KT loose by buying him out of his contract. It's addition by subtraction.[/quote]
I agree. His contract will be on the books for the next 3 years, but if we have a young PF replace him, that guy will be relatively cheap compared to Kenny. So we can basically start developing a big much earlier than expected.
non story?! he's a Hall of Famer. He's the only coach to ever win both a college and NBA Championship!Are we still talking about this? Until Brown is contacted by the Kings, this is the biggest non-story of the year.![]()
According to this evening's news reports, the Kings STILL haven't called Brown. Petrie spent the day talking draft pick with the scouting staff.
This has nothing to do with the Larry Brown non-story, but I just flashed on an old campaign bumper sticker when Jerry Brown was running for governor of California: "If It's Brown, Flush It!"
It's only a story because Ailene Voisin made it one. She's the one who earlier was touting Bill Laimbeer but nobody (with the possible exception of me) bit on that one.
Voisin contacted Brown. Voisin and now Amick have made this a story. It's not a story until/unless the Kings actually show even a trace of interest in Brown and thus far it's only in Voisin's imagination.
I agree. AV needed something to do, so she decides, WTH.......Are we still talking about this? Until Brown is contacted by the Kings, this is the biggest non-story of the year.![]()