Bee: A Q&A with Kings coach Rick Adelman

Warhawk

Give blood and save a life!
Staff member
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/basketball/kings/story/13657309p-14500110c.html

By Mark Kreidler


Entering his eighth and possibly final season as the head coach of the Sacramento Kings, Rick Adelman finds himself with a roster full of unfamiliar faces, a franchise coming off a first-round playoff defeat and a little heat under the seat upon which Adelman sits.
After a turbulent summer marked by the organization's vain pursuit of coach Phil Jackson and the continued turnover of player personnel, Adelman prepared for a season in which he will coach while in the final year of his contract with the Maloof family that owns the team. On the eve of training camp, Adelman sat with Bee sports columnist Mark Kreidler to discuss the changes to the organization - and his future in it.

Q: I'm thinking back past Sacramento to your Portland teams, and it seems like the one thing running through most of those teams in both cities was a roster stability - you had a returning core that you built around each year. Am I thinking about that correctly?


A: That's true. I guess in Portland we always had (Terry) Porter, (Clyde) Drexler, (Kevin) Duckworth, (Jerome) Kersey, Buck Williams and Cliff Robinson.

Q: To me, this offseason marks the first really huge churn since you came to Sacramento, although there have been departures all along the way.

A: Well, I think it all started last summer (2004) with Vlade (Divac) leaving, and it just kind of continued through the whole year. But, yeah, when you look at it - from the time we finished camp last year, we have three guys from that team.

Q: Wait. Is that right? A: When we finished camp, yeah, because it's just Peja (Stojakovic), Mike (Bibby) and Brad (Miller). Can't think of anybody else. And then from last year's playoff roster, there's six guys gone. So there has been a huge, huge turnover, and that's going to be the biggest challenge.

Q: I'm curious about that, because, just looking in from the outside, one might say that although they lost in the first round of the playoffs, with a 50-win team, you don't normally slice off half the roster. But that is what has basically happened.

A: Looking at losing in the first round last season, everybody's going to have his own opinion, but from my standpoint and my staff's standpoint, I don't know what else we were supposed to have done with that team with the changes we made during the year. And then you have your center (Miller) playing with a broken leg and never practicing, and then Bobby (Jackson) trying to come back. You know, when it's all said and done we lost to a better team. We weren't better than they were. But that being said, yeah, we still had a chance to win. We started last season knowing what we had. We still knew what we had to do to win, because we still had Chris (Webber), we still had Doug (Christie). The only one we didn't have was Vlade. And so that was still a known. In the last five years, we've been awfully good, averaging 56 wins and whatever, and every year I knew what we had and how we were going to win. And the team understood what we had to do to win. That's not the case anymore.

Q: And that stopped being the case partway through last season.

A: Oh, without a doubt. And I think the biggest problem we had in not coming together last year and really giving ourselves a chance in the playoffs was, two games after we made the (Webber) trade, Brad broke his leg. I still think we would have won more games than 50 if that hadn't happened, and we would have been much more consistent if he had been out there. But that wasn't the case. It was a bad break, literally.

Q: When you looked at the team that walked off the court in Seattle at the end of the playoffs, was that a 50-win team?

A: I don't think it was, and I knew that that team that walked off there was going to change. It wasn't a team that we were going to take into camp this year. We had to make changes. Geoff and I both knew that. We were very inconsistent as a team. We just didn't have trust as a team. We were just trying to win enough games and see where we ended up in the seedings. I still felt we had a chance to beat Seattle, but when we got to the playoffs, it was pretty obvious that they played their game a lot better than we played our game.

Q: The possibility of acquiring Bonzi Wells comes up. As a coach, knowing his history as a player, what are your concerns, and what concerns do you express? What's your mind process there? Because you're talking about a team needing to come together and jell and trust itself.

A: Well, we didn't go into the thing blind, Geoff and I. It's one thing we've always done, and I think it's why we've been successful - we talk things through. We've never made a personnel decision that we weren't both on the same page with, and Coop (Kings executive Wayne Cooper) is often involved, too. So we knew who he was, and I knew his past history. I knew he was a good player. The reality is, he did come off the bench for Memphis. He also is a guy who depends on the situation. Portland, everything sort of exploded on him there, and then he went to Memphis and had a pretty good first year and then last year had problems again. I talked to him three or four times, lengthy conversations, before that deal was made. It's no different than when you talk to any player who has had a little bit of a checkered past. Now maybe his is moreso, but Chris came here, and everybody talked about how he was, and we picked up Rod Strickland, and he'd had a lot of problems in San Antonio before we got him. I don't know what went on with Bonzi Wells and Mike Fratello, or Bonzi Wells and other coaches. I know that what I'm going to judge him on is what he does from the first day of camp on, and I think we're gonna find out real quick about him. The opportunity is there for him. Starting minutes are there for him. There's the ability to get on the floor and show the league that he can be a solid player on a good team, and that's out there. And if that doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. He has the talent, and Elston (assistant coach Elston Turner) had been around him in Portland and knew him. I talked to him and Geoff talked to him, and I just think, let's see what happens. I think the people who had him before would love to see him just explode on us, too, to verify what happened there. But I've seen guys turn things around. The thing that I have to ask Bonzi - and anybody else, too - is, you're not going to be a distraction. You're gonna be a part of the team. We've been known to help a guy become a better player, and as long as you fit in with the team and you make your teammates better and you're a positive part of it, then things are gonna be fine. But if that doesn't happen, we're gonna know pretty quick and he's gonna know, and we'll have to do something. But I'm not thinking along that route. I'm thinking that he can help us and we can help him. I've always told our players, if we win, if we succeed, you're all going to get noticed for it. Every one of you.

Q: Was there something Bonzi said that you needed to hear, or did you need to just talk straight-up about his past?

A: Oh, yeah, we talked about it. And we talked about the fact that he's going to be challenged here by everybody, and those who write stories about him, and all that. And the one thing - and he said he knew it - was that the fans here in Sacramento want to see a guy who's a good guy who plays hard and tries to do the right thing for his team. And they'll accept you if you do that. But you've got to understand, it's a wait-and-see by everybody to start with. And he understands that. At least, he says he does. But, like I said, it's from the first day. I haven't had the first day yet. But I believe it can work.
 
Q: What has been your perception of Shareef (Abdur-Rahim)? My perception, over the years, is that he's a guy who can put up good numbers on horrible teams, which doesn't answer the question of whether he can thrive on a winning team in which he's the third option, or whatever he is.

A: He has not had a chance to be on a good team yet, and he has acknowledged that. One reason he was talking to us and New Jersey is that he wanted to be with good players. And everybody I've talked to - and I saw him and knew of him when he was at Cal and knew his family - I have never heard anybody who didn't like him, coach or whatever. Everybody speaks so highly of him; he's such a solid guy. And he can really help us with his skills. I don't think he's caught up in, "I have to be the Man." He wants to be a big part of what we're doing. So he has a lot to prove, too. And that's one of the good things about our team. I don't know what kind of team they're going to be, but there's a lot of guys here who want to prove something. I think sometimes here, over the course of the years, it's interesting how success can be overlooked and just pooh-poohed away. I think these (new) guys have to understand that we have created something here. Over the last seven years, there's only three teams that have been in the playoffs every year. We're one of them. In the last five years, only three teams have won 50 games every year. We're one of them. So they're coming in here to a situation that has created something, and I want them to understand that. This is not going to be given to you. We expect to do well, and we expect you to buy into the tradition that we have - and people can say, 'Well, you haven't won a championship,' and all that, but I don't care. It's still hard to maintain that level, and we don't want to drop away from that level. I'm proud of that. And I want these guys to undertake the challenge of maintaining that. In years past, even last year with Chris and Doug still on the team, I knew what we had. We were going to win. But right now, today? People can say, 'Look what they've added,' but I don't know what we've added. Let's find out. But I expect these guys to maintain the same level of what we had before, and it we don't, then we're all underachieving at that point.

Q: So the challenge at this point is in figuring out exactly what you have? A: The change really started when Vlade left. You could see that what we had was changing, and it was just a matter of time before it changed big-time. And that has happened now. But it's also refreshing to have a new group, and take up the challenge. And it's going to be a challenge for those three guys, those core guys - Mike and Peja and Brad. It's going to be on their shoulders, and they can't be the players they were before. They've got to be better. They've got to do things they didn't do before. We all got into a comfort zone, because we knew we were good. We knew we were going to win. And the changes have kind of mixed that up. But Mike has got to be including these guys to play better offensively. He's got to be better defensively. Peja's got to change with the change of the team. Brad has got to change. Not that they aren't going to do the same things, but they've got to take up more of the responsibility - just like we do as a coaching staff with the new players.

Q: As a coach, which is the greater challenge: To get a new group that you're still finding out about, and coach that team, or to continue coaching guys who've heard every speech you've got from having played for you for five years or seven years or whatever the case may be?

A: I don't see it any different. People talk about hearing the same thing over and over - I never bought into that. If that was the case, I mean, look at other sports. Have they stopped listening to Joe Torre in New York or (Bobby) Cox in Atlanta? If people think that you can help them or think that you can be successful, why are they going to stop listening, unless you're just so overbearing? I don't think those guys (on previous Kings teams) got enough credit for maintaining that success over the years, despite all the injuries and everything that went on. But now, I guess I can answer your question at the end of the year. Now I've got a totally different team, so we'll find out how much harder it is with this group: Can I reach them the same way? Can I get them to play the same way? But every year, you have to find a way to form relationships with the people close to you, and I think I've always been able to do that ... That first year here, my gosh, you talk about a makeshift team. We had those guys (Webber, Divac, Williams), but no idea how they would play together. We had Vernon Maxwell and Jon (Barry) and those guys. I think every year is a challenge, whether you've got the same team or you don't.

Q: Here's one difference. When you were starting that project with Sacramento, you had a long-term contract. As of now, you have a one-year contract. You don't have the luxury of saying, boy, in three years this is going to be a monster team. How does that affect how you approach going about it?

A: I look at it this way: We've had a lot of success here. I know what has gone on here. I know that we've been successful, no matter what my contract status is. Going into last season, they (Joe and Gavin Maloof) hadn't picked up my option year, so it's not that much different. I've got a chance to get a team together and have a really good year. I'm going to do what I can to win, and if it's not good enough, they'll tell me. But there's a big difference: This year, if we do well and I can get this team to win, it's my choice what I want to do at the end of the year. It's nobody else's. This isn't just a one-way street here. And so I don't have any doubts about my abilities to coach. If I start worrying about that, I'm not going to get this team to succeed. Sometimes, when you have a long-term contract, the players know it. Well, this year, I don't have time to wait on anybody. I'm trying to get this group together. You either go along with it or you don't. Sometimes it amazes me, the things that are said. It amazed me what happened the day after our season ended (with a first-round playoff loss in Seattle). That was just amazing to me.

Q: You mean the Phil Jackson speculation?

A: The whole thing. It's just not the way things should have been done. You can say, 'Well, Phil Jackson was available.' Well, so was Red Auerbach ... I thought I did a pretty damn good job last year with what went on. And it wasn't about contacting Phil Jackson, but one day after the season ends, and without anybody talking about anything, after being here seven years? I thought that was a mistake. But I can't worry about it. I'm not running the team. I don't own the team. I have a contract right now, and I'm coaching the team ... We lost in the first round, but we got there. That's kind of how I was looking at it. The three years before that, we lost three series in seven games. I mean, seven games. You're right there. We lost to the team with the best record in Minnesota, we lost to Dallas after losing Webber (to injury) - I mean, I can try to make a case, but why? It doesn't help, because it happened. I'm moving on to this year. I'm not going to do anything to short-change myself. When I'm finished here, if I'm finished, I've had a great time. But I don't look at it like I'm finished. I want to have a good year here. It's in my best interest, the players' best interest, and I have the loyalty to this organization and the people to try to do the best I can, because everybody relies on how this team does. That's how I've got to keep approaching it.

Q: Did you ever talk to the Maloofs about that situation? A: I talked to them, I don't know, it was after Las Vegas (the annual summer organizational meeting). They came in and explained the circumstances and I explained how I felt. It didn't change the circumstance of what happened, but they knew where I was coming from. I did want to talk to them. They owed me that, at least, to talk to them. And we had a good discussion and we moved on. I'm sure it's going to be brought up all the time, but, you know ... (he trails off).
 
Q: Geoff Petrie told me this summer that when a coach is in the final year of his contract he's called a lame duck, but when a player is in the final year of his contract he's an "impending free agent" about to play the field.

A: Well, I think the difference is, the player to a large extent can control his free agency by performing or not performing on the floor. He puts the stats up or he doesn't. But a coach might do a really good job, but you're going to have times during the season that are down, and people are going to jump on that (contract status). There's so much more exposure now, with the talk radio and so many people - there's just so much more talking done. I was amazed reading the paper after the third week in the NFL, I mean, in USA Today they had the top three (coaches) who were in trouble. That's reality. But you know, in some ways Geoff is right, and it depends upon how the coach wants to view it. And I don't view myself - if I'm in my last year and things don't work out, I'll move on. I know the circumstances. I'm not afraid of that or worried about it. I love it here. I love the city, the fans - for the most part, everything has been great. So why should I not try to make sure, if I was to be coaching my last year here, that I do a great job and go out on a positive note? That's how I'm looking at it. I know that (contract status) is going to be brought up, just like I've already seen people talk about how we've got to be better defensively. Like my coaching staff, from Pete Carril to Elston (Turner) to T.R. (Dunn) don't realize that? Three years ago, we were the best team in the league defensively. Why aren't we today? I have two players from that team. Personnel changes. Players change. Injuries change things. Age changes it. The dynamics of this team has changed. I know one thing: In the NBA, you've got to look at the talent and the strengths you have, and that's how you build a team to win. And then you've got to work on your weaknesses and get them better. There are a lot of things we've got to do, but I believe strongly in the people on my staff. We're going to continue to teach defense. But I also think we're going to have a pretty good offensive team again. We know what we're dealing with. We've always known that. You can look up at that board right over there. (He walks over to unfold a dry-erase board built into the wall, upon which is written the Kings' league rankings in every pertinent statistical category for the past seven seasons). Like we don't know the difference in our field-goal percentages and what we've done defensively and what we've done offensively? We know what we have to do. Can this team be really good defensively? I don't know. But we'd better be better than we were last year at the end of the year. I'm looking forward to it. I'm really looking forward to seeing what these guys can do, and we're going to be more demanding, especially with our core. We're going to put much more emphasis on our strength-and-conditioning program. We're going to demand more of them during the practice sessions. It's a chance to change the culture a little bit, because it's a different group. When you're successful and you're winning, you're not as quick to make a change. Detroit isn't going to change anything right now.

Q: What was your toughest loss in the offseason, looking at your personnel? Because you had to give up things to get things.

A: (Pauses). Every guy that has left - I mean, not having Vlade back last year was really hard. He was such a huge part, even though we knew we had aged. But what he meant to the team, that was huge to me. Chris and Doug, I mean, both of those ... But this off-season, if you're talking about this summer, it's Bobby (Jackson). There's no doubt. He came and he gave us something that nobody else could give us, and I felt so bad for him that he got hurt with these freakish injuries and never got something going. He's a guy I'd like to see get a nice contract that's going to set him up and his family. But it was time for us to make a change, we had to do something, and he was just the guy involved. I think it could be a good situation for him there (in Memphis). I hope so.

Q: Did you talk to him?

A: Yeah, I did. He was great. Bobby was just great; he understood that it's a business. But it's still hard. It's hard to leave that house - and the last time I talked to him, Bobby said he wanted to keep his house here, and I hope he does. It was tough with Doug, and it was tough with Chris. Each one of those guys had a really difficult situation.

Q: Did you think that Chris needed to leave Sacramento in order for Peja to become fully realized as a player?

A: That never entered my mind. I know what happened last summer (when Webber implied teammates were soft), and Peja was bothered by it and upset by it, and I talked to both him and Chris about that. I think what happened to Peja last year, and especially early in the year, is I think he played tired early in the year. His shooting was down. He was getting shots that he always made, and he wasn't putting them down. And when a shooter is missing like that, you can start looking around for everything (to explain it), but we also changed dramatically as a team. We got real one-dimensional, with a lot of pick and rolls and stuff like that, and we didn't move the ball as well. Everybody looked at Chris, but it wasn't just Chris. Doug had dropped off because he was hurt, and Doug had done a lot of things to get Peja shots. And then suddenly he was gone, and now you've got Cuttino, who was a totally different player than we were used to, and I think that affected Peja. But the last month-and-a-half of the season, he played terrific. Sometimes you go through down periods, and we did that as a team.

Q: Would you agree with the idea that Cuttino was a bad fit for what you were trying to run?

A: I don't think he was a good fit. I don't want to say bad, because you forget how many big shots that guy hit for us to win games when we were struggling to score. I mean, he could score. But when you look at a player from a distance and then actually get him - he wasn't the same type of player I thought he'd be. I always saw him (on film), when they isolated him, getting to the basket. All the time. But in talking to him, he said that ever since they changed the (defensive) rules, every time he'd get the ball there'd be people waiting for him in the paint, since you could do that now - before, they couldn't - so he couldn't get there. And he wasn't the greatest player in terms of penetrating and then finding people. He was just a different player. He was a big-time shooter and a big-time clutch player. He showed that. I give him a little slack, because we get him, and then we get three new guys (in the Webber trade) right after that, and that's tough, to do all that on the fly.

Q: What about Greg Ostertag as a fit?

A: I thought Greg was going to help us, and then he got hurt early. I do think he was out of shape, which he has admitted to. But when we got him, I had envisioned a certain team that we didn't have anymore (when he came back), and he just never found his niche. And I don't blame Greg, because I was trying to win games, too. He didn't fit in offensively with what we were trying to do, and he wasn't rebounding or defending the way we thought he might. And a lot of that wasn't him; we were just out of sync. Guys were getting beat off the dribble so quickly ... He just never got into a good flow, and a guy like Greg, if he doesn't start, you've got to try to get him into at least half the game. And unfortunately, he was never very good in six- and seven-minute spurts. He'd get a couple of fouls, turn it over, and I would make a change. It's not all on him. I think the Utah situation is good for him, and he'll fit. Jerry (Sloan) will play him half the game, I think - and, plus, he's been getting back in shape this summer, and that was a problem the first three months with us. I don't think he realized how far he'd drifted until it was too late. But I have nothing but good feelings about Greg because of the type of person he was. He never gave me any trouble. He didn't complain. He encouraged the other guys. He tried to get better. He's such a likeable guy - almost to a fault, really.
 
Q: Did you hear the clamor last year for more playing time for Maurice Evans? A: He's just a terrific athlete. He had more experience than Kevin (Martin) from college and then playing overseas and with Minnesota a little bit, and Kevin came from a smaller program in college. Maurice is a lot stronger than Kevin, a lot stronger. But I defy anybody to say that Kevin is not as good an athlete. I mean, Kevin Martin has got speed and quickness and jumping ability that is there. Maurice really made a difference; he did a great job for us. That kid played his tail off all the time. But as a basketball player, we just felt that Kevin has a real upside because of his skill level. I think what we have, with Bonzi coming in and Kevin, is a better fit for us as a basketball team.

Q: Is that something that happens in Sacramento a lot, with fans falling in love with maybe a seventh or eighth man and wondering why he's not getting a starter's minutes?

A: It's somebody different from year to year. A few years ago it was Gerald (Wallace). We'd get up by 10 points in the first 10 minutes of the game and people would be calling for Gerald. Hey, how about we wait another 35 minutes or so before we call for him? But that's what makes these fans so great, you know?

Q: I just want to return to your contract situation for one question. There is no discussion about any further deal, correct? Everyone is just leaving it where it lays?

A: I've had no discussion. They've had no discussion with me about doing anything, and after last summer, I really don't expect it. I'm not going to go in and ask for anything. I'm not going to do that. I'm going to coach this team this year, and try to do the best that I can. At the end of this season, I'll make a decision on what I want to do. And if I've done a good job, and they feel like I'm a person they want to talk to, well, that'd be great, because I love the situation. But I'm not going to start talking about that ... I thought that last year, beginning at the start of the season, they should have picked that option year up then. When they did (later, during the season), it was good. But I had already gotten to the point where I am now in terms of how I think about it. I was still going to do the best job that I could, and I'm going to do that now. I mean, I have a contract for a year. They don't owe me another one. Why are you going to worry about that? That's what it is. We signed this. I'm going to coach it. And then we'll see what happens, and I'll decide.

Q: It's interesting in the sense that, while most of us understand that we serve at the pleasure of our boss or the company owner or whomever, we don't necessarily carry that around with us every day. Your situation is different in that it's so public, because it's discussed as part of the team dynamic. Everyone, for example, understands that the corollary to the whole Bonzi Wells experiment is that he's only under contract for one year.

A: I've been fighting this battle for certain reasons every year, no matter how much we've won. There's always someone who thinks we should do better. I just think you can get real surly and real combative if that's the way you're going to approach it: Why aren't they giving me something? It probably would affect what you're going to do on the floor, because you're saying somebody owes you something. Well, no. They owe me the money for this contract year, that's what they owe me. And they're paying me really good money (approximately $3 million for the 2005-06 season), although it's not what USA Today said last year - they said I was the highest paid coach in the league.

Q: Way to go.

A: I was totally amazed. I called my accountant and got my contract out and said, geez, I musta missed something there. If I was making what they said I was making (something like $20 million over two years), I wouldn't have too much to worry about. What amazed me about it was that it was totally, completely erroneous, and then it gets picked up on by other outlets and other reports. I saw it in three or four other articles as the weeks went on.

Q: I didn't realize you had that much clout.

A: My kids were a little surprised about that, too. I got some calls.
 
Interesting, I get the feeling the whole "PJ" situation bothered him a lot more than he's admitted to. Nice to see he's still got his sense of humor though.
 
Really good interview. Mark asks objective questions and lets Coach fill in the details. I think Adelmann's view about being in the last year of his contract is honest and to the point. If he wins with 9 new players (and gets to or past the 2nd round in the playoffs, my input strictly), he expects to stay. If not, well, he takes what comes.

I don't think Coach's status has anything to do with how the team views him. With som many new players they and the the coach are all in the same boat. How he blends Bonzi and SAR into the mix will go a long way to determining everyone's status, including his own.
 
If he wins with 9 new players (and gets to or past the 2nd round in the playoffs, my input strictly), he expects to stay. If not, well, he takes what comes.

Interestingly, that's not quite what I took from his comments. Maybe I'm reading too much into a couple of the things he said, but I thought it sounded like he might not stay even if they offered it to him. It seemed he was trying to get the point across that the organization wasn't the only one who had a say in the matter.
 
Kingsgurl said:
Interestingly, that's not quite what I took from his comments. Maybe I'm reading too much into a couple of the things he said, but I thought it sounded like he might not stay even if they offered it to him. It seemed he was trying to get the point across that the organization wasn't the only one who had a say in the matter.

Exactly! I thought he made it very clear that the final decision is his. Offer or not, he gets to decide.

I thought this was an exceptional interview, but then exactly what I would expect for someone of Kriedler's calibre as a journalist.
 
What impresses me with every Kreidler article I read is how open and candid the players AND Coach Adelman are with him. This piece is a Q and A WITH Adelman, not a bunch of suppositions, conclusions, etc. drawn by a writer who is unable to get a sit-down interview with him.

As I said in the other Kreidler thread, I am very happy we have a least ONE local sports writer who can be truthful about our team without having to bash them or act as though he would like it much better if they moved out of town.

GO KINGS!

GO KREIDLER!!!
 
Q: Did you hear the clamor last year for more playing time for Maurice Evans? A: He's just a terrific athlete. He had more experience than Kevin (Martin) from college and then playing overseas and with Minnesota a little bit, and Kevin came from a smaller program in college. Maurice is a lot stronger than Kevin, a lot stronger. But I defy anybody to say that Kevin is not as good an athlete. I mean, Kevin Martin has got speed and quickness and jumping ability that is there. Maurice really made a difference; he did a great job for us. That kid played his tail off all the time. But as a basketball player, we just felt that Kevin has a real upside because of his skill level. I think what we have, with Bonzi coming in and Kevin, is a better fit for us as a basketball team.
At least Coach didn't forget about Kevin;)
 
Well, not totally...

I noticed earlier in the Q/A that Adelman said he could only remember Peja, Mike and Brad. Do you think you need to tell Kevin to start wearing LOUDER colors or something? Or grow his hair into an afro????

;)
 
Do NOT make me find a way down to Sacramento to smack the crap out of you!






















;)
 
You have to admit, if it is somewhat of a shiny Gold, it will make him look heavier.

Now we see why Ostertag had to go
 
Ah, good point. Tag would have looked like a baked version of the OLD Pillsbury Doughboy. You know, baked to a Golden Brown.

:D

Okay, I promise - no more thread hijacking. This is too good an article to completely derail comments about it.
 
I would hate to see Adelman go simply for his humor.....

Q: I didn't realize you had that much clout.

A: My kids were a little surprised about that, too. I got some calls.
 
I really hoped PJ would of coached the Kings this year. We needed a coach that will bring more defense to the court. But oh well... :(
 
Kings241 said:
I really hoped PJ would of coached the Kings this year. We needed a coach that will bring more defense to the court. But oh well... :(

Did you even read the article?

I know that (contract status) is going to be brought up, just like I've already seen people talk about how we've got to be better defensively. Like my coaching staff, from Pete Carril to Elston (Turner) to T.R. (Dunn) don't realize that? Three years ago, we were the best team in the league defensively. Why aren't we today? I have two players from that team. Personnel changes. Players change. Injuries change things. Age changes it. The dynamics of this team has changed. I know one thing: In the NBA, you've got to look at the talent and the strengths you have, and that's how you build a team to win. And then you've got to work on your weaknesses and get them better. There are a lot of things we've got to do, but I believe strongly in the people on my staff. We're going to continue to teach defense. But I also think we're going to have a pretty good offensive team again. We know what we're dealing with. We've always known that. You can look up at that board right over there. (He walks over to unfold a dry-erase board built into the wall, upon which is written the Kings' league rankings in every pertinent statistical category for the past seven seasons). Like we don't know the difference in our field-goal percentages and what we've done defensively and what we've done offensively? We know what we have to do. Can this team be really good defensively? I don't know. But we'd better be better than we were last year at the end of the year. I'm looking forward to it. I'm really looking forward to seeing what these guys can do, and we're going to be more demanding, especially with our core. We're going to put much more emphasis on our strength-and-conditioning program. We're going to demand more of them during the practice sessions. It's a chance to change the culture a little bit, because it's a different group. When you're successful and you're winning, you're not as quick to make a change.
 
Frankly I'm dissapointed in the Maloofs for not being more supportive of one of the best coaches in the NBA now, if not in the league's history. Phil Jackson has stopped Adelman in every one of his serious Title contentions (besides when the Pistons did it I guess), but he has done it with the services of Michael Jordan, Scotty Pippen, Kobe Bryant, and Shaquile O'Neil. Adelman is a winning, likeable coach who has a history of putting together winning, likeable teams. I don't understand the thought that we are going overhaul a system, a coaching staff and an organizational culture, just for a slight upgrade at coach. Especially when you risk creating the kind of rift that there seems to be now.

It kind of makes me think that the Maloofs wish we WERE the lakers, after courting Shaq two years ago and then going after Phil Jackson. And lets not mention the new uniform color.

Anyway, that was a well done interview, and I'm glad to hear that Adelman doesn't plan on phoning it in this year. It's good to hear some positive Kings talk as we approach the season.
 
Last edited:
Kings113 said:
Great, convincing words from Rick there.

I'm curious about your statement. What, exactly, were you wanting him to convince you of? He laid everything out pretty plainly, which I find much more enlightening than blowing smoke up our collective posteriors.
(or am I totally misunderstanding your comment all the way around?)
 
Kingsgurl said:
I'm curious about your statement. What, exactly, were you wanting him to convince you of? He laid everything out pretty plainly, which I find much more enlightening than blowing smoke up our collective posteriors.
(or am I totally misunderstanding your comment all the way around?)

Heh, no I was completely serious there. It came off meaningful/convincing/whatever (the paragraphs above my post).
 
MK again strikes gold with that Q&A interview. :p

That was a truly in-depth piece that addressed many of the issues which we have pondered this off-season. And, like someone else so aptly posted, he let Rick do the talking rather than interpret and paraphrase.

I think Rick will head for greener pastures after this season, ESPECIALLY if he does well. I love his attitude that he is in charge of his own destiny and that "lame duck" is a lame tag for him.
 
Well, one thing for sure. The Maloofs managed to display Adelman's emotional side. He is pissed. If Phil Jackson becomes the coach of the Kings I may never watch another Kings game.
 
Mark Kreidler is, in my opinion, the best sportswriter in America behind Peter Gammons and I feel extremely privileged that he writes for the Bee. What a great interview!
 
quick dog said:
If Phil Jackson becomes the coach of the Kings I may never watch another Kings game.

You did realize Jackson has signed a VERY lucrative contract with the Lakers again, right?

;)
 
Back
Top