Australian open

#32
The worst part is these players are losing to virtual unknowns! Baghdatis?? Who the hell is that? Pironkova? Not exactly household names. This sucks:(
 

piksi

Hall of Famer
#33
loopymitch said:
The worst part is these players are losing to virtual unknowns! Baghdatis?? Who the hell is that? Pironkova? Not exactly household names. This sucks:(
ther should be a Tony Delk memorial award in tennis too;)
 
#37
Baghdatis isn't just some unknown. The kid is just 20, gave Federer a scare a few years ago (04) at the US Open, and is extremely talented. He made the Aussie Open R16 last year. He hasn't done anything spectacular yet, but given his talent (he was top 3 in juniors), I would not be surprised at all if he makes top 10 in the future.

Think of him as part of the Nadal, Gasquet generation.

The fact that you don't know his name, does not automatically imply he is some random journeyman.

Insomniacal Fan said:
Actually, I think Safin is the only guy that Can beat Federer regularly.
You were referring to somebody else?
I think Piksi meant Roddick.

Safin actually has a backhand. It's his best shot.
 
Last edited:
#39
Bballkingsrock said:
Thats not good......... Its obvious whos gonna win now............
Did you really believe that Roddick would beat Federer? He couldn't do it even if he had a 2 set advantage to start the match. It's 10 - 1 for Fedman. Need I say more?

The only player that might trouble Federer is Ljubicic. And by trouble I mean Federer losing a set.

Hingis is playing great, her tennis is so beautiful to watch. Welcome back!

But she can't go all the way...
 
#40
Kajun said:
I think Piksi meant Roddick.

Safin actually has a backhand. It's his best shot.
I realize piksi was referring to Roddick, I forgot the smiley to demonstrate my attempt at humor.

But I think Safin is the only current player on the tour who has been competitive with Federer during the past couple years where the Fed has dominated the sport. And though I admit it's been a while since I've seen Safin play, isn't he basically a serve and volleyer with a bad attitude?
 
#41
Insomniacal Fan said:
I realize piksi was referring to Roddick, I forgot the smiley to demonstrate my attempt at humor.

But I think Safin is the only current player on the tour who has been competitive with Federer during the past couple years where the Fed has dominated the sport. And though I admit it's been a while since I've seen Safin play, isn't he basically a serve and volleyer with a bad attitude?
Did you forgot the smiley there too? If so, I don't get it.

If not...Oh, dear. ;)

Safin at his best can challenge Federer without a question. The problem of course, he rarely is -- too many injuries, and too many mental breakdowns. Thus using "competitive" is slightly misplaced here. More competitive is Nadal, who's given Fed 3 very tough matches so far. Nalbandian, Kiefer can give Federer some problems when they play (though they aren't really contenders to win titles).

It speaks volumes when you have a tough time coming up with names that "challenge" Federer.
 
Last edited:
#42
Savo said:
Did you really believe that Roddick would beat Federer? He couldn't do it even if he had a 2 set advantage to start the match. It's 10 - 1 for Fedman. Need I say more?

The only player that might trouble Federer is Ljubicic. And by trouble I mean Federer losing a set.

Hingis is playing great, her tennis is so beautiful to watch. Welcome back!

But she can't go all the way...
But when Roddick was there anything can happen. I know Roddick was probably going to lose. But you never know when Roger has a bad day........
 
#43
Bballkingsrock said:
But when Roddick was there anything can happen. I know Roddick was probably going to lose. But you never know when Roger has a bad day........
The thing is, even on his bad days he can still beat most opponents. There's only a handful who would punish him for having an off day, and for some reason I don't think Andy is one of them.
 
#44
Ya I gotta agree - Federer totally owns Roddick. I also agree that Safin, if only he can play his game at a consistent level, can easily challenge Federer. He's definitely got the game and the talent to beat him.

Nalbandian did it at the Masters in Shanghai last year, and even though Roger just came off an injury then and was probably not 100%, Nalbandian showed how to beat him.

Ljubicic lost in five last night to Baghdatis (who I would argue is not some unknown) - he's beaten some good players in his young career. In this same tourney last year, he won over Ljubicic and Robredo before losing to Federer (and it was a good match, too). I think I also remember him beating Haas and Nalbandian late last year. He's definitely a guy to watch.
 
#45
Cant believe Justine beat Davenport. Sharapova is still in it and in my opinion for the final four are:

Amelia Maurasmo, Henin - Hardene, Clisters, Sharapova. Still going with Kim in this one.

A great match is coming up! Clijsters verse Hingis. Cant wait for that one.

Dont even need to talk about hte men's side..........
 
#48
Kajun said:
Fed had a complete off-day today. It will be one hell of a battle against Kiefer, and probably Nalbandian as well.
Yeah, I watched the match and it was tight. Federer now has to play guys who will cause problems for him. Kiefer and Nalbandian/Baghdatis are not intimidated by him and it should be fun. I bet he's sorry that Roddick is not around anymore.

Belgium will have a winner in Australia this year...
 
#52
Kajun said:
Surprise finalists are very common in Melbourne, I guess.
True that. Clement in 2001, Schüttler in 2003 to name a couple. They were both demolished in the final (by Agassi).

Marcos really did a fantastic job today, but I wonder how he will play against Federer. Will he be nervous? It is the final after all. I can't wait to see what happens. So nice to see a new kid on the block (I think people will know who he is from now on). He has great potential. Whether he will develop into something big is another question.
 
#53
Savo said:
True that. Clement in 2001, Schüttler in 2003 to name a couple. They were both demolished in the final (by Agassi).

Marcos really did a fantastic job today, but I wonder how he will play against Federer. Will he be nervous? It is the final after all. I can't wait to see what happens. So nice to see a new kid on the block (I think people will know who he is from now on). He has great potential. Whether he will develop into something big is another question.
The Australian Open has relatively weak players in the last stages, quite often. Compare that to the US Open, where the top players always seem to win.

Regarding Baghdatis, that's a really tough question. If it were a 1st or second round, I'm sure Baghdatis would have given Federer alot of trouble, *especially* when Federer is out of sorts like he is now. But we all know Federer steps it up in the final, and that the last couple of years he's turned into an amazing pressure player. And I imagine Federer is not unhappy that Baghdatis beat Nalbandian.

As far as his future: he will probably be a top 10 player (like I said a few posts back), he may even win a GS, but it's tough to see him becoming a "great" player. Good, but not great.

Federer has yet to make it past Kiefer, of course. That will be one ugly battle.
 
#54
Wow!! You never know in the finals!!Fderer might have an off day and he might have a struggle. I will still give teh edge to Rogetr just I think bagdhatis will try really hard and I am going to say this will go in 4 sets.


In womens, Clijsters had a good start but ened to injury. Really tough loss there since I wanted her to win! I am going with Amelia in this one.

She always chokes but I think she will pull it out this time.
 
#55
Amelia won!! I knew should would win! :) Her first major and im glad she got it.

Now its time for Federer. Does anyone know what time the match with Federer will air?
 
#56
It was GREAT seeing Henin NOT win yet another slam (yes, I greatly dislike her...). Must say, that whole "feeling sick" moment last night was questionanle. henin has played finals before when she was REALLY sick.... ready to fall over and die, but because she was in lead she never retired. Last night she was getting her (you know what) kicked and right away she comes over with this sudden feeling of sickness.... Whatever! Way to go Amelie!!!
 
#57
I like Henin's tennis, but the things she pulls off sometimes are amazing. She always gives excuses for her losses (I wasn't 100%, was injured etc.), and she has a tendency to retire when she's down, and not give the opponent the satisfaction of winning. Pretty sickening.
 
#60
What another great moment in the compelling history of Grand Slam tennis. Baghdatis compeletly energized this tournament w/ his infectious smile and poise not to mention the glorious atmosphere of pandemonium generated by his entourage that reminds one easily of Davis Cup.

In what would otherwise have been another boring run by uber athlete Roger Federer this tournament was transcended by the gifts and charisma of a seeming unknown.

It was that Proverbial Game of Hearts and you could feel the difference. It was palpable. Given the inspired play of Baghdatis, the incomparable commentary by the master, Dick Enberg, the touching camera shots over to Baghdatis' pensive and eventually tearful Parisian girlfirend or finally the warm embrace by the two great competitors to close the match it was yet another unforgettable experience.

Another great year of Grand Slam tennis. A magical moment for Amelia Mauresmo. Another striking portrait of tennis greatness in the form of Roger Federer who is an extraordinary blend of mental toughness and physical dexterity. There is just no one who can match him right now. Baghdatis got his attention and undoubtedly his respect.

Fortunately in this arena it is still all about Heart. That's what seems to make all the difference in the game of sport. And when it happens you can feel the difference. Grand Slam Tennis from the land down under.