19 Reasons the Kings Shouldn't Move to Anaheim

#1
It has become a bit of a foregone conclusion that the Sacramento Kings will be relocated to Anaheim before the next NBA season. The Maloof family, who has owned the Kings since 1999, has yet to file for relocation, but the NBA this week granted the franchise an extension on its application to move. The Maloofs will meet with other owners on April 14-15 as the regular season ends, and the Kings' decision will be made by April 18.

You know what the other 28 NBA franchise owners should tell the Maloofs? No. No, you're not moving to Anaheim. While I'm obviously a Sacramento-bred Kings fan with a whole grip of emotion tied up in this ordeal, I believe the following 19 points are logical and fact-based enough to get the point across without tears and pleading.

1. Sacramento has sold out every game in 17 of 26 seasons. The Kings have sold out all 41 home games in 17 of their 26 seasons in the Sacramento. Think about that: The gym was packed in every game for an entire season 17 out of the 26 years the team has been in town. (All of this comes despite a .438 winning percentage since the Kings moved to Sacramento.)

2. Sacramento has two of the five longest sellout streaks in NBA history. Can you imagine the NBA abandoning a devoted market like Portland or Chicago? Sacramento is right there in terms of fan loyalty, with two of the longest sellout streaks in league history, one of which came over 11 seasons, during which the Kings made the playoffs twice and never won a postseason series.

3. Sacramento would become the largest U.S. market without a major pro sports team. Sacramento is the No. 20 U.S. media market. All 19 metropolitan areas ahead of it have at least one, usually 3-4, major pro sports team. If the NBA abandons Sacramento, it will be leaving a gaping sports void, the type the NBA itself usually likes to fill. (The next two largest media markets with a major pro sports team? Hartford-New Haven and Asheville-Greenville.)

...

The owners, again, meet April 14-15. The Maloofs will ask for advice, and some assurance that their relocation application would be met with approval. For the reasons stated above, I ask that the owners tell them to GTFO.
Source

Mod edit: Can't post entire articles due to copyright law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#3
Meh...we already know the Maloofs know about all these things, and they're still losing money here...so with that said, they know that they can move to the OC and get at LEAST the same amount from their TV contract, if not more(even with 2 other teams there, they still could get $10 million/yr)along with a good handful of other major sponsors to fill their corporate roster...more so than they would ever get here. They will be the new version of Clippers slumlord Donald Sterling, who's made at least a $15 million profit in virtually every season they've been in LA...and SUCKED for all but a couple of them too. The Kings playing 3rd fiddle to the Lake Show and Clip Joint would probably suit them fine financially, and I can't disagree with the Maloofs for leaving a place they have invested alot of emotions in...and lost alot of money in too, remaining patient for the majority of the past decade waiting for our council to get their acts together...unsuccessfully. I know it will be painful for them to leave, they will never forget us...and neither will ANY player or MSE employee from the past. We are a great city that just REALLY needs to find what it's all about and to finally have the PERMANENT civic pride that we displayed for 2 or 3 great Kings seasons last decade. We can do it, but it will take lots of time and work.
 
#4
Meh...we already know the Maloofs know about all these things, and they're still losing money here.
This is actually not true - at least for this season. Mark Kreidler [of KHTK] said just last week on the radio that the Kings will make a profit this year. In Sacramento. With a losing team. With crappy attendance.

From KHTK's website:
But according to Kreidler, sources also said the NBA is not sold on the move. Sacramento is still in play, Kreidler was told, but these developments will not bring the Kings closer to solidifying an arena deal in Sacramento.
The Kings will turn a modest profit this season, due in part to having the smallest payroll in the league. The Kings lost money last season, but not that much, according to league standards — a claim that some find hard to believe.
“My gut says the Maloofs haven’t heard the magic words from Anaheim and that NBA is wary because of history there,” said Kreidler. “Also, they will take NO loan from Ducks owner Henry Samueli – ever.”
 
#5
This is actually not true - at least for this season. Mark Kreidler [of KHTK] said just last week on the radio that the Kings will make a profit this year. In Sacramento. With a losing team. With crappy attendance.

From KHTK's website:
But this is all because we DO have the lowest payroll...and SUCK! So...what's going to happen if we suck next year, then the next...and even though we still have low payroll, who's going to go watch that?? Attendance will slip way below 10,000 a game and it will be harder and harder to 'turn a modest profit' like this year. And even if we do start winning...with winning, comes the need for more quality players...and with that comes the need for a new arena with more sponsors to subsidize the bigger contracts, otherwise they will be WAY in the red. I think this year has been a weird year, and the fact that we've MADE money for the Maloofs is surprising...but I know that won't last forever...even if the Kings start winning. We're still back at square one: We need a new arena with more luxury suites.
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
#6
Great article by TZ. One can only hope the Maloof's are well aware of these facts...
Actually, I felt like this was more directed at the NBA's other 29 owners - these are the reasons the other 29 owners should not vote to allow the Kings to move. Kind of a true last-resort effort - trying to get the NBA to say no to a mov the Maloofs (might) want - but I suppose better than nothing.