I wrote this in the mediocrity thread, but I'll put it here to since it seems this is basically the same conversation
I'll try and provide a constructive point of view on why I'm satisfied with whats happened so far.
This team was a complete mess the last few years. Horrible defensive team, no offensive structure, bad ball and player movement, and pieces that just didnt fit together. Was Evans the main guy or was it Cousins? Did we really have a true PG on the team, or score first guys that we were forced to play there? There was no defensive presence down low outside of the occasional DMC charge drawn, and we have a lot of poor contracts that are around for another 2 years.
As you can see, lots of questions that need answers, and they arent going to be solved in 8 days. But if you look closely you can see the long term vision. They new regime quickly identified they needed to build the team around Cousins. In order to do that they wanted better passing and shooting to space the floor. Step 1, draft McLemore. Step 2, bring back Evans at 7-9 mil/year, once they saw that wasnt happening they moved on because they didnt see him fitting well enough with a Cousins centered offense to pay 11 mil. Step 3 was start putting together a team that "fits" better, apparently their choice was to bring in Calderon (46% 3pt last year and a good passer) and Iggy (team guy, good passer and defender at the SF). Neither guy wanted to come here, not that big of a surprise, their both older and want to win now. So they went with their backup plan and acquired Vazquez, a 6'6" pass first PG who's gotten better every year of his career. Is he the long term solution at PG? Perhaps not, but this team needs to get better in small steps by constructing a team that fits better so they can eventually attract bigger names. Next they bring in Landry, is he perfect to start next to Cousins? No, but he's perfect to eventually be a key member of the 2nd unit, my guess is he only sees 5-10 minutes on the floor with Cousins but still ends up playing 25 mpg leading the bench unit with IT.
Not every problem is going to be solved immediately. And not every move right now is going to address immediate needs. Things were so shi**y here that its going to take a lot of maneuvering before things are complete. These are just the first steps. I'm sure there will be another move to pick up a new SF and probably move one of our existing bigs. I'm beginning to doubt Salmons gets amnestied just because his expiring contract is such an asset, especially nearer to the trade deadline. I just have a problem with people being so upset at what are only the first steps in the process. Rome wasnt built in a day.
And finally let me address the theme that "if they want to be a defensive team why did they let their best defender go?" Well, having that good defender on your team last year did nothing for the team D, and looking the Warriors defensive numbers last year during the regular season the were 4th in opponents FG%, 7th in opponent 3pt%, 1st in defensive rebound rate, without Bogut hurt for most of the year and with a bunch of guys you would consider sub par individual defenders. While I'm sure they would love great individual defenders, I think it will much more important for Malone to get them to play better and smarter TEAM D, which he is capable of doing.
So my thoughts are just, calm down a second, think of the bigger picture a year or 2 down the road, and get ready to see McLemore and McCallum throw down some crazy dunks in the summer league..