That would mean the Maloofs still had involvement in the NBA. There is NO way I want that to be true, regardless of where the Kings end up.
The Kings are no longer the Kings when/if they move to Seattle. It doesn't have to be Anaheim. If the Kings HAD to be sold/moved, just not Seattle. I rather it be Kansas City, Kentucky.. anywhere where at least the history of the team continues just like when the Royals moved to KC.
Seattle is that one specific hell of a situation where they want to wipe the Kings off clean as if it is an expansion team and throw it back in the city and continue their Supersonics history.
I'm sorry, but I can't continue to justify "Seattle deserves a team" because the only team they really deserve is the original Sonics team that they loss or an expansion team. They can either go after Clay Bennett the slim ball or they can wait and continue to work with Stern/Silver for an expansion team.
It is extremely ridiculous to allow Seattle to buy a team from another city and whip away that team's history. It is unfair to all the fans in Sac, KC, Cincy and around the world that ever cared about the Kings.
Just for discussion, lets pretend the Celtics were the only team for sale and hansen offers to buy the team for a very large amount of money to move to Seattle where they will wipe off the history of the team and make it back into his childhood dream "Supersonics".
Would the NBA allow that? Would the owners vote approve or disapprove? How come it's ok to let it slip by because the Kings are not as storied a franchise as certain teams? Fans, regardless of team association should deserve the same amount of respect and consideration.