Surprising Evans stats

[cwebb4]

http://www.82games.com/0910/09SAC3.HTM#onoff

This says that the team's points made per 100 possessions is -9.5 when Evans is on the court. Also, the eFG% is -4.1%. Someone had pointed out these numbers to me and I'm not sure what to think about it, I'm not a big stats person. Do you guys think these stats mean much?

 

[Bricklayer]

If you did around a little you will also discover that our defense gets +9.3pts better when Sergio is on the floor:

http://www.82games.com/0910/09SAC1.HTM#onoff

 

[cwebb4]

If you did around a little you will also discover that our defense gets +9.3pts better when Sergio is on the floor:

http://www.82games.com/0910/09SAC1.HTM#onoff

You're equating the impact a PG makes to team defense to the impact a PG makes to team offense?

 

[Bricklayer]

Man, Brockness is an offensive monster, +12.5pts:

http://www.82games.com/0910/09SAC11.HTM#onoff

 

[cwebb4]

Man, Brockness is an offensive monster, +12.5pts:

http://www.82games.com/0910/09SAC11.HTM#onoff

So you think comparing a player that has a very limited role offensively to a player that has a very large role offensively is a good comparison?

 

[Bricklayer]

You're equating the impact a PG makes to team defense to the impact a PG makes to team offense?

No, I'm just suggesting that stats often have holes in them.

I don't know what to say about this one, except to suggest that this is a team with weak starters but a good bench. That while Tyreke is there for nearly every minute of Kevin's struggles (or the struggles with Kevin), for JTs errors etc., that we've often made up ground with the bench. And after that, its a shrug.

 

[The Hammer]

Man, Brockness is an offensive monster, +12.5pts:

http://www.82games.com/0910/09SAC11.HTM#onoff

Probably has something to do with a certain 58-19 run some team went on in Chicago last year.

 

[BMiller52]

Probably has something to do with a certain 58-19 run some team went on in Chicago last year.

It's because he gets a lot of offensive boards so we get more posessions and he actually can finish a freaking layup/dunk unlike 2 "big men" on this team...

 

[captain bill]

No, I'm just suggesting that stats often have holes in them.

I don't know what to say about this one, except to suggest that this is a team with weak starters but a good bench. That while Tyreke is there for nearly every minute of Kevin's struggles (or the struggles with Kevin), for JTs errors etc., that we've often made up ground with the bench. And after that, its a shrug.

More than our bench being good it had to do with going on runs once the other team gets up 20+ and lets up a lil bit. Even if our bench isn't that much better teams are prone to play less hard with a big advantage, especially in garbage time. Losing teams always make the final score a little more respectable by going on mini-runs in garbage time, meaning that if your team is consistently losing, your starters will have big negatives and your bench players will look better by per-minute stats, even though those points they're making up are, barring a miracle, never going to actually impact the W/L column.

 

[Gabriel]

http://www.82games.com/0910/09SAC3.HTM#onoff

This says that the team's points made per 100 possessions is -9.5 when Evans is on the court. Also, the eFG% is -4.1%. Someone had pointed out these numbers to me and I'm not sure what to think about it, I'm not a big stats person. Do you guys think these stats mean much?

Trade him.

 

[top10]

Why wouldn't it make sense that Evans stats are negative?

as he plays most of the time and the team losses most of its games isn't it almost a given that his stats will reflect it?

it does not really says that he his the one to blame, just that the team losses to much

 

[KingGiant49erFan]

Bingo. spot on first post.

Why wouldn't it make sense that Evans stats are negative?

as he plays most of the time and the team losses most of its games isn't it almost a given that his stats will reflect it?

it does not really says that he his the one to blame, just that the team losses to much