Hedo on the move to ? (titled changed)

#3
Wow, the Blazers could be really tough starting this season. The Lakers may be even stronger and in the East will be the Celtics, Cavs and Magic.

We may have picked a good time not to be challengers.
 

iowamcnabb

Hall of Famer
#6
Hedo makes everyone around him better. If he is making the 3ball he is one of the most important players on the floor. If Oden can stay healthy and do nothing other than block shots and rebound they will be dangerous. They are stacked and have a bunch of trade pieces for the future. Their bench is almost as talented as their starters.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#7
I think Portland just might have found a way into the WCFinals. Solid acquisition - and I think Orlando is really going to regret this.
 
#8
If the Blazers had another yr of playoffs experience under their belt, I would pick them to win the west as of today with the rosters of the other teams considered.

The lakers got Artest, but he won't be content to take less than 10 shots per game per 37 mins of playing time like Ariza. There is only a certain # of shots to go around per game. Artest's shots will come at the expense of others. I would prefer Pau taking more shots than giving them to Ron.

The spurs are better with Jefferson but still need another big to contend. If they get Rasheed, they are up there with the lakers.

But no one has the talent of the Blazers at this point. If Greg Oden develops more for next yr and can stay out of foul trouble, he will be a force with rebounds and protecting the lane. Oden, Aldridge, Hedo, Roy, Blake.... thats a good starting line up. You still have guys like Rudy, Batum, Outlaw, Pyzibilla coming off the bench.
 
#9
If the Blazers had another yr of playoffs experience under their belt, I would pick them to win the west as of today with the rosters of the other teams considered.
Saw this post comin.

Nother 1st round exit puts them atop the championship team. That sounds about right.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#10
hey Gargy! Notice how I carefully worded MY comments so as not to award the title to Portland before they've actually played a game with their new improved roster. :p

If Ron-Ron plays the way he's capable of playing, if he truly buys into the role, you guys just got even better ... Your only real questions are all related, however, to Ron's mental stability and even his desire to win, which can work against you just as much as for you.

I'm looking forward to your battles against Portland, however. I think it could be interesting, to say the least.

:)
 
#11
Portland is not the most talented team right now, not even close. Without a sure fire superstar you can't be in considertion of most "talented" team. Sorry.
 

Spike

Subsidiary Intermediary
Staff member
#12
Portland is not the most talented team right now, not even close. Without a sure fire superstar you can't be in considertion of most "talented" team. Sorry.
You absolutely can.

8 8 8 8 8

vs.

10 5 5 5 4

who has a higher average?

Portland has a lot of upper tier talent, without necessarily having a "superstar." I think they'll do fine. They have a very strong bench and I would put up their starting five with anyone in the west. They're young, they're good, and now they have someone who isn't afraid to take, and make, that last shot in a close fight. There's a lot of good energy coming from Portland right now. Hopefully we'll be in their place within the next 3 years.
 
Last edited:
#13
Portland is not the most talented team right now, not even close. Without a sure fire superstar you can't be in considertion of most "talented" team. Sorry.
Brandon Roy is probably the best player in the league that isn't considered a superstar. That has to count for something. Now throw in Aldridge, Hedo, Blake, Oden, Pryzbilla, Batum, Bayless, Rudy (maybe), and Outlaw (not to mention Pendergraph who I think will contribute this season) and they are at least in consideration for the most talented team.
 
#14
Why does everyone keep talking about oden?

You can outway a team with a superstar if you had a bunch of 8's on your team. Look at sac back in the day and the pistons when they were winning. However as the league is forming into a few teams just loading up on talent like the lakers celtics cavs and spurs potentially, I don't think this Portland team stacks up talent wise against those teams. And they all have a superstar except for maybe Boston cause pierce and KG are slipping.
 
#15
and I'm not saying Portland can't compete with these teams, they have a nice balanced team coming off a very good year. But this argument or debate is regarding talent alone and I just don't think you can say they have more talent then any of the other teams I've mentioned
 
#16
Good move. I still think they need a low post scorer because they've always been associated as a very young, super athletic jump shooting team, and Houston exposed that in this year's playoffs. This at least gives them a veteran who's been in the wars (both with us and with Orlando) and a more skilled foil to their athleticism. I'm not sure if Oden can develop into that, or if injuries will stop him, but if he does they're pretty set, that's for sure. I happen to like Brandon Roy--he has a quiet killer instinct, star quality in his all-around game and no major flaws, so I think he can definitely lead them to the WCF if his heart's set on it.
 
#17
Brandon Roy is probably the best player in the league that isn't considered a superstar. That has to count for something. Now throw in Aldridge, Hedo, Blake, Oden, Pryzbilla, Batum, Bayless, Rudy (maybe), and Outlaw (not to mention Pendergraph who I think will contribute this season) and they are at least in consideration for the most talented team.
Brandon Roy is a superstar.

Also, I would bet the Blazers do not field this team as is next season. They now have serious excess talent at the wing positions, and are lacking a bit at point guard. Not to mention that have a pretty substantial trade excpetion that they picked up from the Kings due to the Diagu trade.
 
#18
Yeah great move for Hedo and Portland. As far as their title possibilities, I have to ask, who else is there in the West besides LA and San Antonio?

Denver I really don't see repeating their success but the West doesn't look too strong.

Right now, I'd say Top 4 looks like this:

1. LA
2. San Antonio
3. Portland
4. Denver

....
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#19
The Portland potential still depends upon Oden -- if he starts coming to life next season, there is nobody who will want to run into them, including the Lakers.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#21
You absolutely can.

8 8 8 8 8

vs.

10 5 5 5 4

who has a higher average?

Portland has a lot of upper tier talent, without necessarily having a "superstar." I think they'll do fine. They have a very strong bench and I would put up their starting five with anyone in the west. They're young, they're good, and now they have someone who isn't afraid to take, and make, that last shot in a close fight. There's a lot of good energy coming from Portland right now. Hopefully we'll be in their place within the next 3 years.

This unfortunately is just wrong thnking in the NBA -- does not work. The team with the hgiher NBA average is team 2. Lots of good players = nice deep playoff run. 1 (or preferably 2) superstars + a bunch of roleplayers = champion. This is why guys like John Paxson and Derek Fisher have rings while guys like Terry Porter and Mike Bibby do not.

The question with Portland is going to be Brandon roy and Grege Oden. Aldridge is a good player, but nto a sueprstar. Hedo is a very good support player. But Roy is going to have to be the man, or Oden is going to have to make huge strides as the man. But they are going to need a "the man" either way.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#22
I think this move puts portland in contention to make it to the finals, although they might still be 1-2 yrs away depending on how oden performs.

But, what the hell is orlando thinking? Their team, with a returning Hedo and healthy nelson would have a great shot at returning to the finals. I don't understand forcing hedo's hand with the VC trade. VC is a great scorer, although not as great as he once was, but he doesn't make anyone around him better. That is exactly what hedo excelled at. I think orlando definately took a huge step back. IMO, their ball movement will really suffer, and dwight will have a tougher time without catching all those lob passes from hedo.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#23
8 8 8 8 8 vs. 10 5 5 5 4 isn't the way it happens a lot of times, however.

It's more like 8 7 8 7 8 vs. 10 6 5 3 3... And in that case, I'd take the first team over the second every day of the week.
 
#24
hey Gargy! Notice how I carefully worded MY comments so as not to award the title to Portland before they've actually played a game with their new improved roster. :p

If Ron-Ron plays the way he's capable of playing, if he truly buys into the role, you guys just got even better ... Your only real questions are all related, however, to Ron's mental stability and even his desire to win, which can work against you just as much as for you.
Well, he's finally made it to the king franchise in terms of historical drama. I don't even know if I should be surprised that somehow the stars aligned to move away from a serene locker room back to coiled tension. This kind of move is the Lakers way and I know that Buss considers his idiocy as extra entertainment value. Believe me, we all know he's going to do schizophrenic things. Forget Peter Gibbons...even LEEZA Gibbons knows it. He am what he am.

Huege, I read a rumor about them being interested in Andre Miller. Dunno the validity of it.

est1999, the Blazers in 2000 had the deepest team in the league and they also had diminishing returns at some positions and lost to 2 superstars in a 7 man rotation.
 
Last edited:

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#25
est1999, the Blazers in 2000 had the deepest team in the league and they also had diminishing returns at some positions and lost to 2 superstars in a 7 man rotation.
Is there any team besides the Utah Jazz that has had two LEGITIMATE superstars and hasn't won a championship?
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#26
Is there any team besides the Utah Jazz that has had two LEGITIMATE superstars and hasn't won a championship?
That depends: do you consider Steve Nash a "legitimate" superstar? Or, alternatively, is your question qualified by a minimum number of years playing together? Or in their prime?

Either way, I think you could make the case that Payton and Kemp were borderline "legitimate" superstars in their prime.
 
#27
Is there any team besides the Utah Jazz that has had two LEGITIMATE superstars and hasn't won a championship?
Shaq and Kobe, Kareem and Magic, West and Wilt, West and Baylor. ;) But it's still rare for an 88888 to beat a 1010555. All those teams that won had at least one superstar and borderline 2 (Havlicek, McHale, Sampson, etc). The 04 Pistons are the most recent outlier.

Malone and Stockton lost to Jordan and Pippen. Pippen was about as close to a superstar as there has been in recent mem. Matter of fact, he was in my eyes compared to someone like McGrady, the label is tossed around too much.
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#28
Is there any team besides the Utah Jazz that has had two LEGITIMATE superstars and hasn't won a championship?
Shaq and Kobe, Kareem and Magic, West and Wilt, West and Baylor...
I get the sense that you did not read the question correctly. It didn't seem as if she was asking whether or not a pair of superstars failed to win a championship during a single, isolated year when they may have been favored to win, she seemed to be asking whether or not there was a pair of superstars who NEVER won a championship IN THEIR ENTIRE tenure of playing together.

In other words, since O'Neal and Bryant won three championships, Abdul-Jabbar and Johnson won five championships together, and West/Chamberlain/Baylor won a championship together, it seems to me that they would be immediately disqualified.
 
#29
I get the sense that you did not read the question correctly. It didn't seem as if she was asking whether or not a pair of superstars failed to win a championship during a single, isolated year when they may have been favored to win, she seemed to be asking whether or not there was a pair of superstars who NEVER won a championship IN THEIR ENTIRE tenure of playing together.=
True. I misread.

West and Baylor (Elgin retired early in 72, didn't get a ring). Can't think of any others.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#30
So basically two superstars is gonna get you a ring at some point. That was my thought...I think.

:)