For now, Amare gets the nod because of his track record but defensively, he is not that much better than Bynum. And his rebounding, his shot blocking capability, and his ability to alter shots is inferior to Andrew's even in Andrew's "undisciplined" defense.
Wow.
Andrew Bynum has a few good games, the Lakers start 8 games above .500, and now Amare Stoudemire only gets the nod because of his track record? Just wow.
I live in Southern Cali, and all the radio talk show hosts have been signing Bynum's (and Kupchak's
) praises all day long, basically because of one game. Mychal Thompson even decided that Bynum is a top five center in the NBA (Thompson is out of touch with reality, clearly, but not many people were disagreeing with him after that assertion).
Amare is more polished offensively, more athletic, has more experience at only 25 years old, and has been referred to since his rookie campaign as a "man-child". This despite coming straight out of high school. He is a better man defender, blocks shots just as well as Bynum, and plays far more aggressively on both ends of the floor. Maybe Bynum is a better rebounder. I think that if Amare played on a more conventional team, he would put up better numbers offensively than any other big man in the NBA.
Bynum is in his third year out of high school, finally shows the promise that the Lakers hoped he would in his third year, and now he's a top five center in the NBA? 28 and 12 is great, especially for a guy that has been ragged on as much as he has been, but it's still just one game against a team that hasn't shown the ability to stop any big men ever.