WCF Revisited

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1
http://blackathlete.net/artman2/publish/Commentary_1/Is_Image_Everything.shtml

<<But without a doubt the most heinous affront to the sporting fan and public was the busting of NBA referee Tim Donaghy. Donaghy, who earned $260,000 a year, was found to have passed on information on basketball games and adversely influenced outcomes of games.

This opened the door for organized crime and, in the mind of a league source, destroyed the image of the league for good. "From my view at courtside, you can't tell what is going on now," suggests the source, who was a former beat writer.
"Every nuance and gesture will be questioned -- when a call is missed or when a lead official is called upon for clarification on a judgment call, fans won't just boo -- they will scream 'fix' or worse."

My source further revealed Donaghy's actions also put in question games where he may not have been involved. "Over the years, I've seen games where the officiating has been a little funky, but nothing where I would've thought there was out-and-out cheating -- except for one game."

"The Western Conference finals between the Sacramento Kings and Los Angeles Lakers a couple years back where Sacramento was a dozen points or so ahead going into the fourth quarter of the final game in the series."

In less than nine minutes, all three of Sacramento's centers fouled out against Shaq -- it was ridiculous the stuff they (refs) were calling."

"Everyone knew that it didn't matter who came out as the Eastern Conference representative, (Commissioner) Stern and the television people wanted the glamour team (Lakers) coming out of the West for those (TV) ratings."

Some would call David Stern a marketing genius -- some would say he saved basketball from going down the tubes. But there are those that see him for what he is -- a stone cold, control freak.

Because image is everything to Stern, his initial response to the Donaghy scandal was that he had things in place that insured such things wouldn't happen. Well, if that were true, then they would've caught Donaghy's *** long before it became a full-blown mess and public relations nightmare!
\ Michael-Louis Ingram is the sports editor for Suavv Magazine in Philadelphia. He is currently working on a upcoming book entitled, "The Best We Never Saw." He can be reached via email at mingram@suavvmagazine.com >>
 
Last edited:

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#2
Is he accusing Stern of ordering the Code Red? I'm not buying it.

As far as the 2002 WCF, I'm over it; besides, no matter what the outcome is, they can't do right by the Kings, anyway.
 
#3
I too am over it. However I find it interesting that the 6th game of the 2002 WCF was selected as the most blatant example of unfair officiating by the "author's source". I would have to agree with that assesment!
 
#5
I'm not over it, and I might never get over it. And not just Game 6; the entire series.

I guess I might get over one day, several years into the future, but I still get mad when I think about it. And I don't see that going away soon.
 

piksi

Hall of Famer
#7
I'm not over it, and I might never get over it. And not just Game 6; the entire series.

I guess I might get over one day, several years into the future, but I still get mad when I think about it. And I don't see that going away soon.
I feel the same.

Only way to get over this is that Kings win it all and that won't happen any time soon
 
#8
Lines from series

KINGS
5/18 LA Lakers L -2 99-106 H 194O
5/20 LA Lakers W -2' 96-90 H 195U
5/24 LA Lakers W +6' 103-90 V 194U
5/26 LA Lakers W +7 99-100 V 195O
5/28 LA Lakers L -2 92-91 H 195U
5/31 LA Lakers W +6 102-106 V 194O
6/2 LA Lakers L -2 106-112 H1 194O

KEY TO LOGS: The Logs contain the following information: Date game was played...11/30 indicates a game was played on November 30; 2/28 indicates a game was played on February 28. H-Home game; V-Away game; N-Neutral site game. Consensus line and pointspread decision is in middle column. W-won vs. pointspread; L-Lost vs. pointspread; N-no decision vs. pointspread. +11' indicates a team was an underdog of 11 and a half points. -11' indicates a team was favored by 11 and a half points. '-indicates half-point. HN or VN indicates a game was played at a site favoring the team designated HN, but not on that team's true home court. Number to the immediate right of H or V indicates number of overtime periods. E.G.-V2 means it was an away game that went to double overtime. The final column represents over-under number and result. E.G.-- 200U means the total on a game was 200 points and it went under that total. 200O means the total was 200 points and it went over that total.
 
#10
I too am over it. However I find it interesting that the 6th game of the 2002 WCF was selected as the most blatant example of unfair officiating by the "author's source". I would have to agree with that assesment!
I'm over it as well, but I find it interesting that almost anytime ANYONE discusses unfair/biased/corrupt officiating, Game 6 of the 2002 WCF comes up.
 
#11
Dave,
What are all these numbers telling you? I am afraid I don't get your point.
It took me awhile as well, but I think the point might be that the Kings beat the spread on that game, so if the officiating was rigged for gambling purposes against the spread, they didn't succeed in swaying the outcome.

Of course if it was rigged against the over/under then they succeeded.

And of course it is highly unlikely that the one-sided nature of that game and that quarter in particular were due to gambling influences, so the point is minor anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.