Could KOBE lead the Cavs to the Finals?

Could KOBE take the Cavs to the Finals?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 32.7%
  • No

    Votes: 35 67.3%

  • Total voters
    52
#4
I just think LeBron does so many more things than Kobe. Yeah Kobe can score alot but if his shot is off would he try hard to get his team involved or would he keep jacking up shots?
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#5
In the east? Almost certainly.

A better question would be to ask whether James could have gotten the Lakers out of the first round.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#7
I just think LeBron does so many more things than Kobe. Yeah Kobe can score alot but if his shot is off would he try hard to get his team involved or would he keep jacking up shots?
Perhaps -- 26 8 and 8 trumps 33 5 and 5 in the versatility department. But the Pistons were ready to be tipped by the first superstar who's supporting cast was willing to hustle and bang.
 
#9
I think he would, the east stinks so bad. And I also doubt that Lebron could get out of the first round if he was on the lakers too.
 
#10
I don't think so. I think James's ability to share the ball really gave the Pistons hesitation to change their defensive schemes to stop him, I don't think that would have been the case with Kobe.

Plus, LeBron's teammate's seem to want to play for him, whereas the complete opposite could be said about Kobe.
 
#11
I don't think so. I think James's ability to share the ball really gave the Pistons hesitation to change their defensive schemes to stop him, I don't think that would have been the case with Kobe.

Plus, LeBron's teammate's seem to want to play for him, whereas the complete opposite could be said about Kobe.

Wow..you have been gone awhile. Kobe's teammates can't hit an open shot if their lives depended on it. There's a difference when you have teammates that can actually make a shot when they get the ball.
 
#12
I don't think so. I think James's ability to share the ball really gave the Pistons hesitation to change their defensive schemes to stop him, I don't think that would have been the case with Kobe.

Plus, LeBron's teammate's seem to want to play for him, whereas the complete opposite could be said about Kobe.
Absolutely. Who wouldn't want to play for him? What doesn't get much mention in the 25 straight points game is:

- LBJ stepping up like a mean SOB when Varejao got flattened before anyone got a chance to react
- LBJ following Gooden around the court and screaming at him when Gooden was making dumb plays early in the game and later in the crunch he was consoling and encouraging his teammates as they were making honest mistakes.
- for the most of the crunch time he had 2 over the hill veterans who were way past their bed time (Snow and Marshall) and 2 dudes who messed their pants (Varejao and Pavlovic) leave it all out on the court defensively so that 25 straight points would matter.

We know that MJ couldn't get to the finals without help, why would Kobe? OK it was different league back then, but still. Detroit has 6 players that a way better then anything Cavs have other then LBJ.
 
#16
Its the east! Kobe by himself, playing 5 on 1 could take himself to the playoffs.

Yeah...to the playoffs not through it.

Just my opinion because there is no prove unless Lakers moves to the EAST.

Lebron is so much more of a leader and a team player than Kobe will ever be. That is if Kobe has any at all. He is very similar to Steve Nash imo. Kobe is and always will be a one man show. Even if you stick Michael Jordan with Kobe, Kobe wouldn't passed it to MJ. ;) Just being harshed on Kobe but you get my drift.

"I think he would, the east stinks so bad"
Championship won for the last three years: East then West then last year East. They may not have as many good teams but they do have team that did beat the West best.
 
Last edited:
#21
There was an article about this in the Daily News... They compared Kobe's teammates to LeBron's teammates and found that they weren't really all that different talent wise.
 
#23
There was an article about this in the Daily News... They compared Kobe's teammates to LeBron's teammates and found that they weren't really all that different talent wise.
Of course, that's not entirely accurate.

I agree with Slim that a better question would be could LeBron have done more with the Lakers than Kobe did. We'll never know the answer to either question, though.
 
#24
Wow..you have been gone awhile. Kobe's teammates can't hit an open shot if their lives depended on it. There's a difference when you have teammates that can actually make a shot when they get the ball.
Exactly who are all the sharpshooters on the Cavs?

In the regular season the Lakers had a much higher FG% as a team (.480 vs. .420), had a much higher 3pt% (.350 vs. .320) and also shot it better from the charity stripe (.760 vs. .742). So much for that theory.

The Lakers are the far better shooting team than the Cavs which only helps to prove my point... thank you.

But here's the really funny part, the reason why you think the Lakers have worse players than the Cavs is because you always hear Kobe complaining about his teammate's, and you never hear a word out of LeBron... exactly.
 
#25
The pistons and Tayshaun can give Kobe issues, but they are too light to defend Lebron. I don't think the Lakers would have beat the Pistons, so I don't think a Kobe w/ Cavs team would have either.
 
#26
The Lakers are the far better shooting team than the Cavs which only helps to prove my point... thank you.

But here's the really funny part, the reason why you think the Lakers have worse players than the Cavs is because you always hear Kobe complaining about his teammate's, and you never hear a word out of LeBron... exactly.
The reason I know the Lakers are worse than the Cavs - after you get past Odom, of course - is because I have watched them play enough over the past three seasons to know exactly how terrible the role players are. Odom is inconsistent and often hurt, Luke Walton has athletic limitations, Kwame has academic limitations, and so on.

The Cavs supporting cast isn't great either, but watching Vujacic and Gibson step up against the Nets and Pistons showed how much better a team can be if you have a couple of players who won't stick their heads in the sand in the playoffs.
 
#27
The Cavs supporting cast isn't great either, but watching Vujacic and Gibson step up against the Nets and Pistons showed how much better a team can be if you have a couple of players who won't stick their heads in the sand in the playoffs.
Of course I'm sure their ability to take the chance and step up has nothing to do with the fact that the superstar on their team is all about passing, whereas the Lakers superstar's MO is a very Keyshawn-like "Give me the damn ball".
 
#28
Of course I'm sure their ability to take the chance and step up has nothing to do with the fact that the superstar on their team is all about passing, whereas the Lakers superstar's MO is a very Keyshawn-like "Give me the damn ball".
I disagree with that, but it's irrelevant. I just don't think the Lakers role players are as good as the Cavs role players. Their performances could very well have a lot to do with Kobe's attitude in comparison with LeBron's, but I still don't think they are as talented.
 
#29
I disagree with that, but it's irrelevant. I just don't think the Lakers role players are as good as the Cavs role players. Their performances could very well have a lot to do with Kobe's attitude in comparison with LeBron's, but I still don't think they are as talented.
I think my opinion plus my statistical evidence > your opinion.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#30
The lakers only have the one guy ( Odom).

Cavs team are misfits, but they've got former All Stars at C and OG, and at least a third guy (Gooden) better than any Laker other than Odom is currently.

And all of that said, Cleveland is better, but they aren't THAT much better. And that was how the records played out. The Lakers won...42? The Cavs won 50. Better, but not in a total other world. But Cleveland IS in a total other world when it comes to the Conference they were in. If they'd been out West, the current NBA Finals would have been the matchup IN THE FIRST ROUND (Cavs would hae been a 6th seed in the West). :eek:
 
Last edited: