Adelman on the Kings: They have the talent

#1
ESPN Insider Article

"We did a good job at the end of the year, but it ended up not meaning much," said Adelman, who still sounded resentful, but not quite bitter, after being let go in Sacramento after eight years at the helm, each season ending in a playoff loss. "You always have that interest in how is it going to work out now, and I still follow them. They certainly have the talent to make the playoffs.

BURN!!!!
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#3
Burn... whatever. We have the talent to be a low seed and get our butts kicked in the playoffs. I think we all know who the better coach is. That really doesn't change the fact that some big moves are needed to make the team an actual contender instead of the team with the longest active playoff streak with nothing to show for it. If stinking it up this season and missing the playoffs accelerates those changes I'm all for it.
 
#7
Complete speculation, but I imagine the Kings would be closer to 23-16 with Adelman rather than 16-23.
Last year we were 17-22 at this time and heading for the **** pile until Ron came to try and resurrect his career and Bonzi started to play for a contract. W/O Bonzi last year we are swept by SA.
 
#8
Last year we were 17-22 at this time and heading for the **** pile until Ron came to try and resurrect his career and Bonzi started to play for a contract. W/O Bonzi last year we are swept by SA.

Rick didn't have a 20 PPG Kevin Martin and Muss has had Ron Artest the whole season. With Ron Artest Adelman went like 26-14. With Artest Musselman has gone 16-23.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#9
Last year we were 17-22 at this time and heading for the **** pile until Ron came to try and resurrect his career and Bonzi started to play for a contract. W/O Bonzi last year we are swept by SA.
Amazing how many guys came to Sac to resurrect their careers. Odd how that had nothing at all to do with the coach. :rolleyes:

In some ways maybe this is all for the best -- the Maloofs (and some fans) get a little lesson in humility and perspective, and Rick isn't there to hold together the leaky ship anymore and cover up how bad we are listing. Remove the scapegoaat, fall apart, and finally truly rebuild.
 
#10
Last year we were 17-22 at this time and heading for the **** pile until Ron came to try and resurrect his career and Bonzi started to play for a contract. W/O Bonzi last year we are swept by SA.
The Kings better right this ship soon or your leaky I hate Adelman theory will go down. If this is indeed the same team, they are going to have to have an amazing finish.
 
#11
Complete speculation, but I imagine the Kings would be closer to 23-16 with Adelman rather than 16-23.
Agreed.

Our biggest fear would be a first round exit with little chance of significant improvement.

Now our biggest fear is a 38-44 season with even less chance of significant improvement, because nobody is dumb enough to trade for veterans who are playing like ****, and nobody wants to join a totally demoralized team.
 
#15
The Kings better right this ship soon or your leaky I hate Adelman theory will go down. If this is indeed the same team, they are going to have to have an amazing finish.
Brick can speak for himself, but I am pretty sure that you missed the point of his post. He was saying that Adelman held the leaky ship (the Kings) together with his superior coaching. Now that he is gone, it all falls apart. This is better because Adelman probably woulde have made the Playoffs with this team and it would be truly mediocre forever without chance of a true rebuild. The Maloofs would not agree to a genuine rebuilding unless they are loosing so badly that it does not matter. We never would have gotten there (or here) with Adelman.
 
#17
Brick can speak for himself, but I am pretty sure that you missed the point of his post. He was saying that Adelman held the leaky ship (the Kings) together with his superior coaching. Now that he is gone, it all falls apart. This is better because Adelman probably woulde have made the Playoffs with this team and it would be truly mediocre forever without chance of a true rebuild. The Maloofs would not agree to a genuine rebuilding unless they are loosing so badly that it does not matter. We never would have gotten there (or here) with Adelman.
You missed the point of my post. Ryle has a weak argument regarding Adelman record versus this year Muss's record.
 

Larry89

Disgruntled Kings Fan
#18
Last year we were 17-22 at this time and heading for the **** pile until Ron came to try and resurrect his career and Bonzi started to play for a contract. W/O Bonzi last year we are swept by SA.
Aren't you the one that wanted Adelman gone like 3 times last year?

Well anyways, we had Peja instead of Artest.
 
#22
I would have expected him to say exactly what he did. He should be resentful, and he's completely honest when he says we have the talent to make the playoffs.
 
#25
Adleman got a raw deal here I think. Winningest coach in the entire franchise's history and let go like he was a bum.

Personally, I hope he get's the job in Portland. That's his home and his family is all there. The time off he's getting now will regenerate the batteries.

He'll be back and I wish him the best.
 
#27
Complete speculation, but I imagine the Kings would be closer to 23-16 with Adelman rather than 16-23.

My speculation is that the Kings would likely have had a few more wins under Adelman (you have to look at the number of games that starters missed to gauge this season), so I would put them at 19-20, maybe 20-19. To think that they would be seven games better is a bit optimistic, no matter how they played at the end of last year.

I also speculate that many people on the board would be wanting Adelman gone if he were still here.

Also, I don't think Adelman was "dissing" the new coach or organization with his statement. He was supporting the players and GM he worked with for many years. What else could he say in that situation? The team isn't good enough to make the playoffs. That would be more of a "burn."
 
Last edited:
#28
My speculation is that the Kings would likely have had a few more wins under Adelman (you have to look at the number of games that starters missed to gauge this season), so I would put them at 19-20, maybe 20-19. To think that they would be seven games better is a bit optimistic, no matter how they played at the end of last year.

I also speculate that many people on the board would be wanting Adelman gone if he were still here.

Also, I don't think Adelman was "dissing" the new coach or organization with his statement. He was supporting the players and GM he worked with for many years. What else could he say in that situation? The team isn't good enough to make the playoffs. That would be more of a "burn."
only those who don't know any better.

i've been an adelman supporter since he got here and brought a winning culture with him to sacramento...however, i also have no reservations about pointing out his faults and deficiencies. he's certainly no perfect coach. here's the thing, you're gonna have a hard time finding a coach in the nba that fits the perfect offensive/defensive balance every team wishes to create for themselves. there are only a coupla those guys around, and they aren't leaving the teams they're currently coaching anytime soon.

so yes, i was open to the idea of change at the head coaching position when it was brought up at the end of last season. but i was only open to change if there was a more-than-suitable replacement available that the kings could take a chance on. i'll be straight with people, i was excited about musselman becoming the next kings head coach when he was hired...but it was almost exclusively because the whole whisenant situation had me so worried that musselman seemed like the next red auerbach at the time. at the moment, though, rick adelman's record speaks for itself...as does musselman's. one's a winner. the other is not. we can talk all day about how adelman never got the ring, but i will take my chances every day of the week and twice on sunday with a 752-481 coaching record, along with 8 straight playoff appearances in sacramento.

but i guess that's neither here nor there. the kings will likely be better off in the long run, because a losing culture will earn them some solid draft picks, and, hopefully, a positive future. but that doesn't make adelman supporters wrong about what he is capable of doing.
 
#29
I was one who thought Adelman needed to go and the team needed a change. Now I realize how good of a coach he was. But like Brick mentioned he would have only continued to be the gum holding together a leaky ship. It's about time the boat fell apart and we get a new one.
 
#30
but i guess that's neither here nor there. the kings will likely be better off in the long run, because a losing culture will earn them some solid draft picks, and, hopefully, a positive future. but that doesn't make adelman supporters wrong about what he is capable of doing.
You make some nice points Padrino. The Kings knew what they had in Adelman (and that was a winner and a winning team). I would suggest that they don't know what they have in Musselman yet. It's been less than half of a season and the team has faced some adversity. It's a little early to talk about a "losing culture." Count me as an ostrich with my head in the sand; it will take at least the rest of the season before I join the ranks of the chicken littles.

This board has become depressing to visit. It seems that people's biggest hope is that the Kings will play poorly so that they can get a better draft pick. A win to me always feels better than a loss, no matter if they wreck their draft position or not. (I know different thread).