Rumor about November ballot proposition

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#1
There's a rumor floating around that things may be heading in the RIGHT direction. This could mean something on the ballot in November.
 
#4
Rumors, rumors, rumors! Gossip is such a good and bad thing at the same time! Hopefully this one doesn't get our hopes up for nothing!
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#5
Amanjoy - You can choose to believe it or not. Personally, I'm cautiously optimistic. And right now, that's good enough...

I don't post baseless gossip, BTW. I cannot and will not say where I heard it, but it's more reliable than just "gossip."

:D
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#7
Let's all keep our fingers crossed that they keep at this until it's done. I would like nothing more than to see a headline on tomorrow's Bee that says ARENA PROPOSAL ON BALLOT!

:)
 
#8
Let's all keep our fingers crossed that they keep at this until it's done. I would like nothing more than to see a headline on tomorrow's Bee that says ARENA PROPOSAL ON BALLOT!

:)
or at least ready for review, beings they have to submit it for ballot review before it actually gets on the ballot. I wonder how long it takes once it is submitted for review? grrrrr...this is killing me, I'm listening to Grant and Mike just chomping at the bit at all the idiots that say 'oh its $27 a year, and for some people thats alot of money' Dammit, I'll give you double, triple, I dont care, just give us a new arena dammit!
 
#9
Grant did say in passing that it was looking like there was a good chance on a November vote. He didn't expand on that. So buyer beware when it comes to the redhead's rumors.
 
#10
I posted that rumor here last week, it was on Eric Hogue in the morning he said that the ballot measure will for sure be on the November ballot so this is old news.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#13
I posted that rumor here last week, it was on Eric Hogue in the morning he said that the ballot measure will for sure be on the November ballot so this is old news.
You posted a rumor last week? Hey, that's wonderful. :rolleyes:

Have you been following the articles in the Bee by any remote chance? This isn't old news and it isn't an old rumor. If you choose not to believe what I've posted, that's perfectly okay with me but you're wrong about it being old news.

And just who is Eric Hogue? NOTHING has been announced officially and may or may not actually get to that point. And I'm pretty sure IF there is an accord and a ballot measure that actually comes to pass it will be all over the news.

I'm simply sharing what I heard in the past couple of hours. Again, I can't imagine how it could possible relate to anything you posted a week ago.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#15
It would be financing. The rest would be ironed out, I believe, between the city/county and the Maloofs. The only real issue the voters would address would be spending some portion of public money on the project and where that public money would come from.
 
#16
There's a rumor floating around that things may be heading in the RIGHT direction. This could mean something on the ballot in November.
Yes, but do you know if it is a proposal that is passable? That is my greatest concern. If I am not mistaken, a sales tax increase would require a 2/3 majority to pass. Those are some long odds, jack!
 
#17
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but did anyone else hear on KCRA at 6 p.m. that they were told by county or city officials that they are feeling less than 50/50 on this making the ballot?

KCRA also reported there will be a press conference of some kind from a group of people that will argue the sales tax increase because it's unfair to low income families.

I have talked about this on a Sacramento Myspace group and many are against the proposed rumored sales tax increase. From what I could gather, they're not Kings fans and do not exactly have good paying jobs.

Some even believe the arena does not need replacing and tried to use Madison Square Garden as an example.

They would rather see the money go towards something else that would be beneficial such as water meters for all homes.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#18
A sales tax increase is unfair to low income families? Low income families would barely feel it because they have little disposable income.

I just hope it makes it to the ballot so everyone can address these types of questions.

NO funding plan will ever get the approval of everyone. Let's just hope it gets a fair chance.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#19
Yes, but do you know if it is a proposal that is passable? That is my greatest concern. If I am not mistaken, a sales tax increase would require a 2/3 majority to pass. Those are some long odds, jack!
I don't know anything more than what I've posted. I'm just the messenger.
 
#22
Some even believe the arena does not need replacing and tried to use Madison Square Garden as an example.
You might tell them that MSG was massively renovated in 1991 to the tune of $200 million. That's $200 million 16 years ago!:eek:

EDIT: Unfortunately, more than one engineer has determined that due to the lousy foundation put in for Arco, renovation of the existing arena is out of the question.
 
Last edited:
#24
If the proposal is similar to what has been hinted at, the sales tax would be for multiple public projects. Since it would not be specifically and only for a new arena, it would only take a majority vote, not 2/3s. That's apparently how it was done in San Jose.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#25
LOVE the optimism.

Over before it starts. Not good karma at all.
There will always be those who gleefully want to be on the "doom and gloom" side of an issue.

There were lots of people who decried our excitement when Lukenbill was still in the process of bringing the Kings to Sacramento in the first place.

"It'll never get done!" they cried.

There were those who were sure the Kings would be gone when the Maloofs bought the Kings.

"They'll move them as soon as they own them," they screamed.

And now there are those who, for whatever reason, want to renounce this latest glimmer of hope before it's even clear enough to discuss.

It's not bad karma. Those people don't have any effect on the karma, IMHO.

:p
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#26
You might tell them that MSG was massively renovated in 1991 to the tune of $200 million. That's $200 million 16 years ago!:eek:

EDIT: Unfortunately, more than one engineer has determined that due to the lousy foundation put in for Arco, renovation of the existing arena is out of the question.
And that puts the feasibility of the railyard project onto the table, which may end up being a good thing. With the combination of downtown renewal, etc. the idea of a new arena may be a lot more palatable to some.
 
#27
I don't understand the particulars, but Dickinson (sp?) said they have pretty much determined that the cost will be about even whether its in Natomas or the Railyards. That's why the site has been pretty much settled in these talks.

I liked the Maloofs idea of having the arena reflect Sacramento's rail history. Of course, I like trains generally. :D
 
#28
You might tell them that MSG was massively renovated in 1991 to the tune of $200 million. That's $200 million 16 years ago!:eek:

EDIT: Unfortunately, more than one engineer has determined that due to the lousy foundation put in for Arco, renovation of the existing arena is out of the question.
Believe me, I did mention that because Arco Arena was made quickly and cheaply ($40 million in 1987-1988), so it cannot be renovated. Yet some still feel Arco Arena does not need to be replaced. I have tried to use examples of other arenas/stadiums/ballparks to everyday things we have such as cars and homes. It all fell on deaf ears. They simply do not want any part of it. They are a small sampling of what is believed to be the majority based on voter polls on the news.

Some even argued that $40 million is too much to spend. You cannot win over those voters at all.

NOTE from VF21: There were links here for articles about the funding of the new 49er stadium in San Francisco. I've split them off into their own thread because of the potential for total and complete confusion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#29
Voter polls can be very misleading.

At this point, the first step has to be getting it onto the ballot. Then the work about educating the public on why they should approve the measure begins.

It won't turn on the naysayers, anyway. It will turn on whether or not the supporters are able to muster enough interest to get people off their posteriors and into the booth to vote.
 
#30
I think once something gets done people will be more apt to change their mind/stance. As the time narrows I hear more and more of the for side as opposed to before were it was mostly nay side.

With the real threat of the Kings leaving that may change some opinions. And like VF said its all about who comes out to vote. With the GOV election there should be a decent turnout.