He's signed through 24-25, with the final year of his salary at 40M. So, no, he would not be cheap enough in near terms at least. If we were to trade for him, we couldn't without involving a major salary. Just not worth it.
On another note, sensing a slight change in NBA this season. Early days yet, but the teams built around stars surrounded by role players are not doing as well as teams with overall depth. Jazz for example, were expected to be BAD after trading away most of their stars to rebuild, but are doing great. Teams like Nets, Lakers, built with the idea that you ride your stars are faltering.
Let's see how it plays out long term, but if this holds, even less reason to do a 2 for 1 kind of deal, particularly for a player currently so broken.