Unfortunately, having this information out there probably only makes things worse for us. The real problem with NBA officiating is how subjective many of the calls are. When all the Tim Donoughy reports came out you could go back and watch games he officiated when he had a stake in the game and I can't tell if he's purposely making calls to help one team or the other. They look just like any other NBA game.
Based on his testimony of how he picked winners from knowing the crew assignments, the main factors here are: (1) Who is the league hyping up in their marketing? (2) Who do the refs get along with and look up to? (3) Who gets the benefit of the doubt because they have established a culture of winning? We haven't been able to benefit from having a brand name superstar since the CWebb days and for whatever reason, every player who comes through here can't help but lobby with the refs after every call. Now we're seen as sore losers too because only sore losers talk about the calls after a loss. Even if Mike Brown was right that they got the call wrong (and clearly he was), saying that really only serves to embarrass the officials publicly which just gives them more reason to have subconscious bias against us. After 20 years of this, there's a lot of psychological baggage adding up to keep us where we are.