Well, let's start here and then we can potentially move our way up the food chain. I'd rather have a roster chalk full of "Above average Kings players" than the usual nonsense we try to pass off as NBA talent.
Point is, DDV is young and good. Kings aren't in a position to be letting guys like that walk out the door without an actual plan to replace him (which may be the case, but we'll see).
And I understand that point of view as well, letting talent walk is for the most part a foolish way to run a team. I’m betting there’s a plan in place here though. My overall view of this whole DDV decision is we aren’t going to be winning with no actual 2 guards on the roster, which is why I believe there’s a definite plan here. On the flip side we’re still not going to be winning team all of a sudden with DDV starting for us at the 2 guard either so let’s cut our losses and look for something that’s worthwhile. Even with DDV brought back we’re in need of a 2 guard upgrade, we just have a more cluttered roster now.
Like let’s play out the scenarios here :
We give DDV a QO, he doesn’t get any offers out there and plays with us for a year and then walks as a UFA.
We give DDV a QO, some team tries to grab him with a multi year deal worth more than 7 mil of the offer and we match. Now he’s clogging the roster and we still need a 2 guard upgrade.
We let him walk right now, since he’s unhappy with the organization already and use this year to see if we can’t find a 2 guard of the future in TD or another FA.
DDV could always sign the QO, or we match another teams offer, retain him and he becomes our 2 guard of the future. But in his 4 years in the league and looking at statistical evidence this seems highly unlikely for him. And on a small market team, with a cheap owner, having unnecessary contracts eat into possible cap space is a huge proponent of how a team gets stuck in 16 years of mediocrity and no direction with little actual options to change course.