meh. Drafting for fit is always bad until you have a/potential top 15 player. The Kings for a large part of their existence have had a severe talent deficiency. Even if it doesn't fit right away, get the talent, figure out the fit later.
And in theory, Fox-Buddy-Barnes-Holmes should be an absolute stunning fit with complimentary skill sets. So why isn't it?
If you've drafted BPA multiple times and hit it out of the park, then the first signs of it potentially not working on the floor, you sell high. Period.
So many reasons but also overall that isn't a squad that truly fits the modern game either, Barnes is a 4, not a 3 that's going to change a game. We have full proof of that now. There were injuries, and overall there are still huge gaps on the wing depth wise. Defensively, they can't and don't buy into a versatile pressure scheme very much. DC kind of did at times. They held onto a holdover coach for 1.5 years too long. Confidence and consistency are huge. You have to time your ascension right as well. Walton was NEVER going to stick. Never. History said it. Giving Gentry the spot last season when they had a sliver of hope at the play in was the proper move. Giving Gentry (a Luke hire) the spot now while the Buddy/Bagley cloud still lingers, along with another drop in success to kick off the transition isn't fair to him, but also stupid to have done it IMO. In the end it doesn't matter how much talent you have, or how they fit, if they are misused and lose confidence, you have a very short rope before even a run of success can be flushed. This is why you have teams with talent that go on 9 game win streaks and 8 game losing streaks. The team has answered the bell before but it's only a matter of time before it's down for the count.