Bucks Trade In Jeopardy: Bogi Didn’t Agree Go to the Bucks
- Thread starter captain bill
- Start date
I thought maybe the expansion of the bucks pel deal was to get more players with salary to up the bogdan S & T deal but then bucks sign pat connington so I don’t think bogie is gonna happen
then now that Joe Harris got signed to Nets the hawks only have 2 FA targets Bogie and Rondo and 26m in cap space left.
I hope they sign Rondo for 10-11 mil and only have 15 m left for bogie cause then maybe then we get huerter and a 2nd for 18 m s&t bogie
then now that Joe Harris got signed to Nets the hawks only have 2 FA targets Bogie and Rondo and 26m in cap space left.
I hope they sign Rondo for 10-11 mil and only have 15 m left for bogie cause then maybe then we get huerter and a 2nd for 18 m s&t bogie
Last edited:
I wonder if a S&T to the Wizards for Wall would be feasible if the Wizards attach two or three 1sts and a pick swap or two. Could be a Paul in OKC type situation. He “only” has three years left on his deal. It’s a lot of money, but should come with some nice sweeteners. Not sure how Fox would feel, but there is the UK connection—if Fox said no, then drop it. But, could be interesting; that gets Bogi the 2nd or 3rd option he’s looking to be, on a good-ish team. Would net us a lot of assets, and a guy that may be able to bounce back into a big time player.
There is a lesson to be learned here. When we take the best possible talent in the draft regardless of need and figure the rest out later, this can be the later. Now I’m an advocate for BPA but you have it be smart and decisive when it comes time to sort it out. I should add, the Bogi/Buddy thing isn’t an example of drafting decisions, it’s just reminder how messy things can get when dealing with egos etc
Help me understand this... noob question...
We can match any offer by any team trying to sign Bogi, so why is everyone keep saying like we are 100% going to lose him for nothing if, for example, the Hawks really want him and are willing to pay $20 mil/4 years-ish level of a contract anyway, can we match and then trade him to the Hawks, aka sign-n-trade?
We can match any offer by any team trying to sign Bogi, so why is everyone keep saying like we are 100% going to lose him for nothing if, for example, the Hawks really want him and are willing to pay $20 mil/4 years-ish level of a contract anyway, can we match and then trade him to the Hawks, aka sign-n-trade?
These are two different transactions though. There's nothing stopping Atlanta from changing their mind about paying Bogdan $20 million a year after we match the contract meaning it's now our contract and we've either totally screwed our salary cap keeping a team together which hasn't made the playoffs yet or we've got to convince another team that trading their assets for the right to pay Bogdan $20 million a year is in their best interest. I feel like both of those outcomes are worse than simply letting him leave.
On Friday, The Athletic’s Sam Amick and Eric Nehm reported that the Lakers are pursuing a sign-and-trade for Bogdanovic, who’s sign-and-trade deal to the Bucks fell apart. League sources confirmed the report: The Lakers are indeed pursuing Bogdanovic, though the Hawks are considered the favorites. – via Kevin O'Connor @ The Ringer