After that second INT the niners had a 96.1% chance of winning. They gacked it away. .
You don‘t really buy into that nonsense, do you? Those percentages are flawed and skewed. It‘s taking into account other players and teams that aren’t KC or Mahomes or even say, Tom Brady. It’s nonsense. That’s why KC won 3 playoff games the stats nerds claim they had 95%+ chance of losing.
The 49ers may have “gacked” as you put it, but Mahomes and KC also took it. I said this earlier and firmly believe that even had Garoppolo connected on that pass to Sanders, KC was still gonna win. The way Mahomes and KC’s offense was playing in Q4 and all of their postseason comebacks, I‘d estimate their chances at driving the field in 1:30 with 3 timeouts at 96.1% too.
But back to the point, SF didn’t dominant 75% of that game as purported. The first half was played evenly. The Niners dominated Q3 and the Chiefs dominated Q4. Anybody claiming otherwise isn‘t judging objectively.
Furthermore, if I had a dollar for every time the KINGS held a Q4 lead against a top team only to have that team flip the switch and win, I’d be a you know what. The Niners holding a Q4 lead didn’t at all entitle them to a W.
The Saints held a very late lead against SF and lost. Seattle was a disputed millimeter away from beating SF twice but still lost. What were their percentages of winning? Doesn‘t matter. It only matters which team has more points when the clock strikes zero.
Not only did KC have more points, they ended the game up by 11. So I’m baffled why SF fans think they were somehow cheated. I mean, it could be argued that SF is fortunate that game wasn’t longer. Because the way KC’s offense was starting to go, it might have been a 25 point loss if another 10 minutes were played.