I wish the Kings would just give Fox the keys to our offense, and sees how it plays out. We desperately need to see if Fox is our franchise player. If he is, then we need to build around him. If he's not, then we need to look for a franchise player in the 2018 draft. This is the major problem I had with the George Hill signing. How can we possibly tell if Fox can be our franchise player if he's playing backup PG? Are we going to rely on 20mpg flashes of Fox to determine that he's our franchise player? I'm not going to be comfortable with that... "flashes" aren't enough for me.
The situation is even more urgent with Fox due to his playstyle. He plays at the most important position in the NBA. However, he can't shoot 3s. 90% of the entire NBA revolves around 3pt shooting now. If we find out that he is our franchise player, then we need to immediately build a roster around him that can shoot. On top of that, if we find out that he's best as a ball dominant player, then we need to find players that can play alongside his ball dominancy. How will we able to determine if he's THE guy if he's playing backup? You can't.
I don't understand the purpose of the George Hill signing. Starting PGs in the NBA don't have a learning curve. Look at how dominant Rose, Westbrook, Curry, Wall, Lillard, etc. were in their rookie years. Fox is all around their ages. Historically, good NBA PGs don't need an extra year of sitting on the bench and learning. They just don't. The only recent player I remember who "sat" and learned behind a PG was Dennis Schoreder, but Atlanta never drafted him to be a starting PG, let alone franchise player. They drafted him to be a backup to their 24yearsold franchise PG Jeff Teague.