I think you misread my post.
I am saying Tyreke can defend and doesn't dominate the ball like Rajon did. He doesn't need to hold the ball for 18 seconds of the 24 sec shot clock like rondo did.
I think Tyreke would start at point guard alongside afflalo. DC would backup the point guard and shooting guard.
Tyreke is ball dominant in his own way. I've repeatedly pointed out that Rondo's alleged ball hoggery is Steve Nash ball hoggery. Yeah, he has the ball all the time, because HE'S TRYING TO SET UP TEAMMATES. That's how all the pure points work.
Reke does it different. People who didn't watch much Pelicans ball before Gentry came and ****ed things up would not have watched it, but Reke too of course likes to have that ball, set up up top, and burn seconds trying to rock his man into a mistake. The difference in New Orleans was that they were using him in high pick and rolls, and his rushes to the hoop were opening up tons of opportunities for A.D. on the other side of the key. Scylla and Charybdis. Like what Chris Paul and DeAndre Jordan do, only A.D. is obviously a lot more talented than Jordan.
Gentry came in, preaching, dum dum dum... (or more like dumb dumb dumb) a "ball movement offense", wants Reke to quickly swing the ball rather than sit on it, and even before the injuries, Reke was struggling again. That's not his thing. Reke needs to dominate the ball (frankly like basically every great offensive perimeter player). But if you let him you get both his own rushes, and you get a lot of drive and drop and drive and dish assists.
As for a fit here...besides liking Reke, I think his length and versatility might really be an asset again. Not only a long PG with creative attacking ability to take some pressure off Cuz, but with the size to play next to Collison at SG, and even to provide us with some smallball SF looks, which is nice given we'd be putatively trading away Rudy to get him. Lot of versatility, patching a lot of potential holes.
Concerns would be:
1) how serious is Joerger about his own "ball movement offense". Because that isn't Reke, its not Rubio, its not Rondo. Coaches always seem to like to preach that stuff, but if you have a player who can create offense without it, a smart coach backs off and lets the player be themselves. Is that Joerger? No idea.
2) pseudo-Princeton? There have been some hints, both as the coach of Marc Gasol as a high post center, and in remarks about WCS initiating some offense up high, + the ongoing suspicion about any team helmed by Vlade, that we might be having some thoughts of running some pseudo-Princeton offense with Cuz and WCS. If that's true, then the Princeton is almost as bad as the triangle for ball dominant guards. Its an anti-PG offense. It killed JWill. Shaved 3 assists off of Bibby. Again, neither Rondo, Rubio, nor Reke is suited for that if that's what we are aiming for.
3) Injuries. Not only the ankles, but Reke has now had repeated arthoscopic knee procedures. We think of him as just Reke, the kid we drafted, but he's got 7 years on those knees now, and was always prone to getting banged up. A healthy Reke could really add some spice and fill a lot of holes. And he played in 72 and 79 games in his first two New Orleans seasons, its not like he's been in steady decline. Those would obviously be great game totals for us. But he was having problems at the end of 2014-15 by the time the playoffs rolled around, and last year only played 25 games. I like the idea, think its all kinds of interesting with the long athletic build we are going for, but he's got to be on court to help.
4) Relationship with Cuz. There was some talk back when we let him go that it was because he and Cuz didn't get along. I never really bought into that. Sounded like too pat an excuse for a ****up. But it would be nice to know there wasn't any real bad blood there that winning wouldn't fix.