I guess now I know how the Isaiah Thomas fans feel. $14 million a year under a $94-110 million dollar cap is a very reasonable deal. We're going to be spending 29 million dollars next season alone for Arron Afflalo, Anthony Tolliver, and Garrett Temple. That's more than what Rondo just signed for and his is spread out over 2 years. Money obviously had nothing to do with it. I can't help feeling like the writing's on the wall for us. We needed a huge off-season to restore some hope and instead we had, well, basically an average Sacramento Kings off-season. Our 2 key free agents went elsewhere and we overpaid some mid-tier veterans to fill out the roster. This is what drove me crazy about Geoff Petrie -- every year he would dole out his helping of cap space on filler instead of targeting key players. The quality of your top 3 or 4 guys more often than not is what determines your winning potential. Nobody we've signed comes close to mattering in that context.
It's great that we haven't spent crazy money, but if spending crazy money is what it takes to win, where does that leave us? Boston spent crazy money on Al Horford but now they have Al freakin' Horford on their team next season for the same amount of money we're paying Afflalo, Tolliver, and Temple. I'd rather the team overspend if that's what the market dictates and actually put a competitive product on the floor. Sure other teams are crazy to be signing these big contracts, but contracts don't play basketball. There are 30 teams trying to win so the market dictates the value of those players. And once the season starts, the numbers don't matter. What matters is who you have on the floor. If this is the strategy we're going to take, we're already re-building. It's just a matter of time before the other shoe drops.
We absolutely got creamed if talent was the goal, but I'm not convinced it was.
Now, you have to be a little careful here, because this is also what a coach will do if he is weak and insecure, but its not impossible at all for a new coach to come in and a want to change the culture and here is the key risky part: want to eliminate dissonant egos/competing voices in the lockerroom. Want to create a clean structure. Vicek stay out of it. Vlade be hands off. Joerger --> Cuz --> peons. Straight line. No competing egos. Fill the roster with roelplayers who know what their role is and don't dream big, and kids who you can mold to be that sort of player. Have Cuz be even more Cuyz than ever, the unquestioned oncourt leader. Everybody looks to him and plays off of him.
And so its a culture change, and a change in team structure. For the moment having other talented pieces next to Cuz isn't as important as getting the franchise to speak with one cohesive voice and play with one purpose. No side agendas.
On 2001-02 the San Antonio Spurs won 58 games in a season with their big C/PF averaging a very familiar feeling 25.5pts 12.7reb 3.7ast in a grinding 40.6min/gm. There was no second option. teh ghosts of David Raobinson and Steve Smith were the 2nd and 3rd leading scorers at 12.2pt and 11.6pts a game. Tony Parker was a rookie who averaged 9.2pts 4.3ast on .419 shooting.
Now none of our non-2nd/3rd options has the pedigree and residual talent of an Admiral or Smith, unless it be caron -- be interesting to see if he gets back into the rotation. But assuming the idiot doesn't miss a chunk of the season for hitting a woman, Collison, Omri and to a lesser degree Afflalo might all be able to chip in with those sort of 13-15ppg support scoring nights. If Bogdan comes over that's another weapon. Then some spot shooters to convert open looks, and length and defense to keep the opposing team under 100. If Cuz stays healthy and thumps inside for big nights its a structure that can work....at least until you are able to finally bring back in one or two major talents to support your main guy.