Kings trade JT, Nik and Landry to Sixers (renamed)
- Thread starter VF21
- Start date
S
You have 100 sport writers saying it's bad, including maybe the best NBA writer right now (Zach Lowe).
and than you have a local guy saying it's good....
Not the same...
and than you have a local guy saying it's good....
Not the same...
One more time .... we should at least wait to see what the Kings get with their cap
You have 100 sport writers saying it's bad, including maybe the best NBA writer right now (Zach Lowe).
and than you have a local guy saying it's good....
Not the same...
and than you have a local guy saying it's good....
Not the same...
You have to take what writers are saying with a grain of salt. Stauskas is being highly-overrated by people outside of the Kings fanbase who actually watched him play last year. Stauskas will probably be a 4th option of a good team, so not really much of a loss there when you are still trying to develop Ben. Landry was a waste a space as he could never stay on the court. Thompson while a decent big just needed a fresh start somewhere else.
People are hating on us because of what we might become. As stupid as we have been, we had PDA then and Divac now. Divac has already proved he's got common sense and a good head on his shoulders. Look, if we get Rondo and Wes:
-Rondo/Collison
-Wes/Ben
-Rudy or trade/Casspi
-WCS or Rudy/Moreland
-Cousins/unknown
I don't care what anyone has to say. That's a playoff team. Rondo will have tons of weapons to pass to (Cousins, Rudy, Wes, Ben, WCS for lobs), Cousins will do his thing and so will Rudy, Wes at 90% is better than Ben at 200%, and WCS is an unproven, but talented rookie. We need another big desperately, which we will probably try to acquire through trades, but that is a ton of potential. I would have dreamt of this lineup less than a year ago, and now we can actually make it happen! Will it? I don't know, but now there is a chance. All we have to do is strengthen up the bench with that lineup.
-Rondo/Collison
-Wes/Ben
-Rudy or trade/Casspi
-WCS or Rudy/Moreland
-Cousins/unknown
I don't care what anyone has to say. That's a playoff team. Rondo will have tons of weapons to pass to (Cousins, Rudy, Wes, Ben, WCS for lobs), Cousins will do his thing and so will Rudy, Wes at 90% is better than Ben at 200%, and WCS is an unproven, but talented rookie. We need another big desperately, which we will probably try to acquire through trades, but that is a ton of potential. I would have dreamt of this lineup less than a year ago, and now we can actually make it happen! Will it? I don't know, but now there is a chance. All we have to do is strengthen up the bench with that lineup.
Exactly! We don't know! I don't care how good one sportswriter is compared to another, these write-ups aren't reports, they are opinion pieces. They can guess how this ends about as well as any of us can. The Kings may end up with everyone they want and it works. They may end up with everyone they want and it doesn't work. They may get no one they want, but instead sign 3 or 4 lower tier free agents who end up making a big impact and it works. They may get no one they want, sign 3 or 4 lower tier free agents who all underperform and it doesn't work. Those appear to be the options. We have to hope the leadership of Divac and Karl can make it work. I know a lot of people are off the Karl bandwagon right now, but don't forget, he is a coach that has made it work before.
This team needed something new, to break up the stagnation. I have gone back and forth with this trade, it's rolling the dice, but sometimes you have to shake it up. I don't think this team is too far away, I know we only ended up with 29 wins. However we have a superstar player in Cousins, a borderline All-Star in Gay, a solid PG in Collison, a rookie who seems to fit perfectly in what we need in Cauley-Stein, and who knows how McLemore will continue to develop. A couple of solid additions could push this team to the next level and now the Kings have the money to perhaps make that happen when they didn't before. There is at least something positive there.
This team needed something new, to break up the stagnation. I have gone back and forth with this trade, it's rolling the dice, but sometimes you have to shake it up. I don't think this team is too far away, I know we only ended up with 29 wins. However we have a superstar player in Cousins, a borderline All-Star in Gay, a solid PG in Collison, a rookie who seems to fit perfectly in what we need in Cauley-Stein, and who knows how McLemore will continue to develop. A couple of solid additions could push this team to the next level and now the Kings have the money to perhaps make that happen when they didn't before. There is at least something positive there.
You have 100 sport writers saying it's bad, including maybe the best NBA writer right now (Zach Lowe).
and than you have a local guy saying it's good....
Not the same...
and than you have a local guy saying it's good....
Not the same...
And that is of course the problem with almost all national writers. They really don't have a ****ing clue what is going on in a little berg like Sacto, so they all bleat at each other in a self-reinforcing cluster**** as they lemming right over the nearest available cliff.
I'm not talking about the talking-heads sport radio guys, I'm talking about guys who doesn't go by rumors... like Lowe, Pelton, Haberstroh and more. local guys are inherently biased and it takes no expert to do this.
this is not rumor based... so the rest is irrelevent.
You can say a trade is good or bad before we finish doing that, a bad trade can lead to good things- it doesn't make it less bad.
If it will be good for me to buy a certain car if it costs less than 5 grand (let's say for gas money consideration)- it doesn't mean I made a good deal if I bought it at 4 when it's market value is 2...
I will be better than I was before- but I still made a crap deal...
this is not rumor based... so the rest is irrelevent.
You can say a trade is good or bad before we finish doing that, a bad trade can lead to good things- it doesn't make it less bad.
If it will be good for me to buy a certain car if it costs less than 5 grand (let's say for gas money consideration)- it doesn't mean I made a good deal if I bought it at 4 when it's market value is 2...
I will be better than I was before- but I still made a crap deal...
That is a really formidable lineup and not just for a remote run at the 8 seed. Would be nice to add a legit piece of beef down low who can give some fouls but wow - that lineup would have sounded far fetched two days ago before the salary purge. Now it looks fairly likely.
Any chance, any chance at all, to add Kosta to that mix?
Any chance, any chance at all, to add Kosta to that mix?
Maybe the Gudaitis kid acquired in the Philly trade comes over.....he fits that role based on observing the draft video.... strong, tough, was able to hold his own in the post defense against some big boys. If we can get a NBA vet in here great, if not, I'm going in this direction instead of a recycled type like Ryan Hollins.
James Ham has limited access and carries water for ownership in an effort to get more. I listened to the podcast with Bruski and it was kind of obvious that Bruski is more knowledgeable and a better basketball mind.
Lowe is the best NBA writer today and it's a joke to compare him to Ham.
I think Lowe's take is right on: Kings paid a fair price to dump those contracts, but the trade doesn't make much sense given the current FA landscape and the state of the Kings roster. It's a panic move from an organization that is making panic moves it's calling card
Lowe is the best NBA writer today and it's a joke to compare him to Ham.
I think Lowe's take is right on: Kings paid a fair price to dump those contracts, but the trade doesn't make much sense given the current FA landscape and the state of the Kings roster. It's a panic move from an organization that is making panic moves it's calling card
Just redefine athleticism to mean whatever you want it mean?
Athleticism includes quickness, speed, coordination, jumping height, jumping quickness, and whatever other trait you want to add (not subtract) to make it all inclusive. Also, the most important athletic attribute for a guard is quickness. I find it wishful thinking to believe that an achilles injury is no big deal for a guard, especially if you believe the guard doesn't have that much athleticism to begin with.
Athleticism includes quickness, speed, coordination, jumping height, jumping quickness, and whatever other trait you want to add (not subtract) to make it all inclusive. Also, the most important athletic attribute for a guard is quickness. I find it wishful thinking to believe that an achilles injury is no big deal for a guard, especially if you believe the guard doesn't have that much athleticism to begin with.
Just redefine athleticism to mean whatever you want it mean? Athleticism includes quickness, speed, coordination, jumping height, jumping quickness, and whatever other trait you want to add (not subtract) to make it all inclusive. Also, the most important athletic attribute for a guard is quickness. I find it wishful thinking to believe that an achilles injury is no big deal for a guard, especially if you believe the guard doesn't have that much athleticism to begin with.
Athleticism includes quickness, speed, coordination, jumping height, jumping quickness, and whatever other trait you want to add (not subtract) to make it all inclusive. Also, the most important athletic attribute for a guard is quickness. I find it wishful thinking to believe that an achilles injury is no big deal for a guard, especially if you believe the guard doesn't have that much athleticism to begin with.
My point exactly- you know about this team everything, and your point of view is biased, you have limited knowledge about around the league stuff, about what we payed compared to other, about how much teams should pay on a salary dump etc..
You knowing all the little bits about the Kings doesn't give you an advantage when discussing if what they did is good or bad in a league wide perspective- again you could be better off doing something and still having a bad deal.
You knowing all the little bits about the Kings doesn't give you an advantage when discussing if what they did is good or bad in a league wide perspective- again you could be better off doing something and still having a bad deal.
If you will grant that much, that's pretty good.
Then it is just a difference of opinion on the current state of the Kings. I think the current state of the Kings is bonafide impending disaster (have another PACEy season - lose Cuz - scrape the bottom of the Western Conference forevermore) - so panic measure is warranted. But if Zach and you think the Kings were in a position to incrementally improve without a shake-up of this magnitude - and were going to round into a perennial deep playoff team given enough discipline and patience from the front office.. then ok - you have yours and I have mine.
But that is far from saying that the swap is a "fleecing" or a "disaster" for the Kings.
Then it is just a difference of opinion on the current state of the Kings. I think the current state of the Kings is bonafide impending disaster (have another PACEy season - lose Cuz - scrape the bottom of the Western Conference forevermore) - so panic measure is warranted. But if Zach and you think the Kings were in a position to incrementally improve without a shake-up of this magnitude - and were going to round into a perennial deep playoff team given enough discipline and patience from the front office.. then ok - you have yours and I have mine.
But that is far from saying that the swap is a "fleecing" or a "disaster" for the Kings.
I'm not talking about some bad bloggers, these guys talk with NBA GM's on a regular basis, they have access to almost every metrics NBA front offices have.
You are just backing up and sticking to your guns when someone criticize from the outside, that doesn't make you correct- and it sure as hell not make James Ham who's livelihood depends on inside information from the front office and can't talk trash about them right.
Here is what he said about Cousins earlier this year:
DeMarcus Cousins — Sacramento Kings
There is nothing in the NBA like peak Cousins. He is an unguardable monster on the block. The Kings are formidable when he plays and a D-League team when he sits. He was on track to be a no-brainer All-Star before coming down with viral meningitis and watching as the Kings decided they’d be better off with Tyrone Corbin coaching this season.
Yeah, he is doubling down alright...
You are just backing up and sticking to your guns when someone criticize from the outside, that doesn't make you correct- and it sure as hell not make James Ham who's livelihood depends on inside information from the front office and can't talk trash about them right.
Here is what he said about Cousins earlier this year:
DeMarcus Cousins — Sacramento Kings
There is nothing in the NBA like peak Cousins. He is an unguardable monster on the block. The Kings are formidable when he plays and a D-League team when he sits. He was on track to be a no-brainer All-Star before coming down with viral meningitis and watching as the Kings decided they’d be better off with Tyrone Corbin coaching this season.
Yeah, he is doubling down alright...
Here's the article that allegedly "bashed" Boogie:
http://grantland.com/features/the-future-demarcus-boogie-cousins-nba-biggest-mystery/
Even though I disagree with the conclusion, it's a well written article that clearly shows that Lowe watched a ton of tape, broke it down in detail, and carefully reviewed Boogie's stats. His criticisms are fair and well defended. I think we've forgotten already how much Cousins improved over the last two years, and a lot of credit for that has to go to Malone. Cousins definitely has a lot of bad habits despite his tremendous talents. To use that article as a slam on Lowe is silly, and something I'd only expect from ideologues and people who don't trust stats and "nerds"
http://grantland.com/features/the-future-demarcus-boogie-cousins-nba-biggest-mystery/
Even though I disagree with the conclusion, it's a well written article that clearly shows that Lowe watched a ton of tape, broke it down in detail, and carefully reviewed Boogie's stats. His criticisms are fair and well defended. I think we've forgotten already how much Cousins improved over the last two years, and a lot of credit for that has to go to Malone. Cousins definitely has a lot of bad habits despite his tremendous talents. To use that article as a slam on Lowe is silly, and something I'd only expect from ideologues and people who don't trust stats and "nerds"