Don't know what to tell you. I watched Kentucky play 26 times this year counting the tournament, and if you watched them play enough, you'd understand that WCS seldom had his number called on the offensive side of the ball. It's not that he can't score, it's that he seldom gets the chance to score. They didn't need him to score. Almost all of his baskets came on fast breaks, putbacks, and alley opps. Sprinkled in over the entire season, he'd occasionally hit a 15 foot jumper, or score on an over the left shoulder hook shot. But in general, Calapari wanted ball movement, and people that were more prolific scorers doing the heavy lifting. Anyone, and I mean anyone, that did nothing but look at stats on the Kentucky players, has no idea how good or bad they are. If you tuned in for the wrong game, you'd think Karl Towns was not worth the time of day. You might see a game where he scored 4 points on 5 shots, had 3 boards and played 17 minutes. If you judged him on that game, you wouldn't have a clue how damm good a player he is. And I'm not talking about you, but in general.
Now saying that your comparing Turner to Towns makes perfect sense. Their similar players skill wise. But that's where it ends. However, as I said, I'm willing to cut Turner some slack because of how he was played, just like I'm willing to make concessions with WCS. I would have liked to see Turner on a team where he was a more featured player in the offense. He wasn't, so all we have to go on is what we saw. What I find interesting is some want to praise Turner's post game, and criticize Towns post game. That totally blows my mind. Turner seldom went into the post, while Towns spent probably 70% of his time in the post when it came to scoring, and he was very efficient at it. When I watch collge players, I don't pay a lot of attention to their stats, or Per's until after the fact. I really don't care. I'm more interested in how they play the game and what their skill set is. I also take into account as to how their being used. There's a reason that most UCLA players under Howland ended up being better NBA players than they showed at UCLA. I think the same thing could be said of Barnes at Texas.
To sum it up, I'm pretty sure I know what WCS can do. I'm not sure I know the same about Turner. So its not that I really disagree with you on his potential. He may ultimately end up being the better player. I just think there's more risk involved with Turner. Plus, I don't put that much emphasis on the offense of a defensive PF next to Cousins.