Actually those were good comments by C-Webb, and he should repeat them, every time he can, because that lowers WCS value - would be nice to get #6 pick, be able to trade down and still pick WCS, plus another asset in the process. That's, why I wrote, that the best thing for WCS coming into the League would be slotted into PF defensively and be a sidekick to center with strong offensive game on the other end.
Jordan averaged under 8 points in 20 minutes for Texas A&M, his offensive game hasn't change since, except for slowly polishing his very limited college skill set, so I don't think, he would score more as a junior. And, if WCS played center for Duke next to 4 perimeter player, who all can shoot and pass to various degree, he would probably dunk his way to 15 points at least instead of 10. Instead he plays for a team, that faces packed paint more often than not, because that's the only prayer-chance, the other team has to beat them.
People forget, that Jordan needs to be thrown a ball near the basket to re-route it in. You can throw ball to WCS, when he's on the move, he can actually make one dribble and not lose it or has to slow down, and then put it in the basket. Solid spot shooting is probably the best improvement, you can hope for from WCS during his career, but then again Reggie Evans still scores from under the basket every now and then.
Not talking about top3, that at this point seems set with KAT, OK4 and D'Russell:
Mudiay - 1) does not have a complete game at this point with shooting problems, and might not be that good of a fit anyway due to ball dominance; 2) PG is not really a problem for Kings
Justise - 1) cannot do anything off the dribble, and that's not a skill, you expect a player to pick up easily with hard work; 2) set shooting looks better, but FT is still only .630 - no one knows, how he reacts to expanded arc plus quicker defenders; 3) looks great against college 4s, not sure you can project, what he does as NBA SF - with his tools and willingness to work he is going to be a good defender with elite transition and weak side defense, but being a stopper is not a guarantee, which you probably want from a lottery pick, who cannot create offense.
SJohnson - 1) probably top3 scorer in the draft, and certainly most ready one, but finishing inside is a potentially limiting problem as he botched too many transition finishes, than the guy with his physicality should. Still he's probably the best bet to eventually move into Rudy's #2 option slot with his versatile offensive game; 2) SJ was measured taller and with longer wingspan than Winslow in US basketball camp, but with his wide shoulders this translates to only 8'7" reach, which is rather low in NBA, so I wouldn't bet on more than him becoming a good defender - elite may not be on the cards.
Porzingis - 1) is not even close to being ready for NBA physicality: under 50% finishing around the rim, given amount of dunks he had, means something like 25-33% on contested finishes. Shies away from contact in Europe, so will be completely intimidated in the NBA. Plus he has very narrow shoulders, so at this point all you can project is John Henson with ability to shoot. Produces at similar levels as Bargnani in the middle of 2000s, when Italian league was still 1b to ACBs 1a.
Hezonja - 1) mostly spot shooter with some moments off the dribble game, lighter and weaker, but quicker, than Winslow and Johnson, so he's SG/SF, rather than clear SF, but might struggle defensively at both positions at first. Can really score, mostly from perimeter. Might be the best fit next to Cousins offensively as he's an off the ball, mostly perimeter threat with ability to become #2 option. Longer Klay Thompson maybe. Looks selfish, and that really stands out in Europe, reminds Kobe in attitude, where confidence turns into cockiness.
Turner - 1) struggles with physicality, and though he's much closer to NBA, than Porzingis, he's also slower. Recently I saw a Grantland podcast with Doug Collins, where he talked about physical changes in guys with late growth spurts, that lead to changes in the way they move, which means lack of mobility might be here to stay. At this point he should probably looked at as center, and he has much less physicality for that, than WCS, and it likely takes his off the dribble game with strong potential off the table.
Taking WCS is still dominantly preferred course of action, but Kings might go for one of 3 SFs as well.