[Game] Kings vs. Warriors - 19 FEB 2014, 22:00 EST/19:00 PST

Who else is gone before the deadline?

  • Thomas

    Votes: 6 46.2%
  • McLemore

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Thompson

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • Fredette

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • Outlaw

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Williams

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Acy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Landry

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Gray

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • No one

    Votes: 3 23.1%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
#65
I want nothing to do with Jack, nor would I move JT for a backup PG without a replacement big coming in return. JT for Varejao we can talk about.
Unlikely. Cavs have gone on a win streak and are now not completely out of the playoff picture in the East. I doubt they drop their one major defensive asset for a rotation big.
 
#66
If we do this trade, I'd lose all confidence in the FO. I do not want Jack..... why the hell would we trade our only legit big?(not counting Cuz)
Tank tank tank. Time to get serious about losing I think.

Lose JT, we become really awful. He's our #2 big, suddenly you're starting Evans? Yikes.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#68
If we do this trade, I'd lose all confidence in the FO. I do not want Jack..... why the hell would we trade our only legit big?(not counting Cuz)
I agree. I guess they want to make room for their great FA signing Landry. Or plan on drafting a big guy. Or maybe just for the heck of it. Why let there be an stability. It might lead to winning. Not sure winning is the goal.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#69
Unlikely. Cavs have gone on a win streak and are now not completely out of the playoff picture in the East. I doubt they drop their one major defensive asset for a rotation big.
I'd agree it's not likely. It's why I wouldn't be talking to Cle at all. If they're willing to talk about Varejao, then open up dialogue.
 
#71
I thought that's what Kings been doing - LOSING.
We are talking an epic lose 23 of the last 29 type losing streak here. The pieces are in place.

PDA just said this trade gives the young guys a chance to play. That means tasteful tanking in full effect. Play hard but lose.

I'd like to say we haven't seen that before here, but we have.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#81
Tank tank tank. Time to get serious about losing I think.

Lose JT, we become really awful. He's our #2 big, suddenly you're starting Evans? Yikes.
No offense, but we've only won 18 games. I think we're already pretty freaking serious about losing. Why? Because we're NOT a good team. We simply cannot win without Cousins on the court.

Tanking is a choice. This isn't a choice. This is sucking at a major level.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#88
IT was guarding Thompson.. he scored... now IT starts guarding Curry...he's scoring again..
And you're surprised why exactly? IT cannot guard Thompson, he cannot guard Curry, he cannot guard __________________ (fill in name of any other adequate guard in the league).