Voisin: Petrie says Brown wouldn't have been right fit

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/kings/story/232002.html

Ailene Voisin: Petrie says Brown would not have been the right fit
By Ailene Voisin - Bee Sports Columnist
Last Updated 12:19 am PDT Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1


This is a monumental roll of the dice, a Las Vegas gamble in more ways than one. Reggie Theus is a safer choice than Larry Brown?

I must be missing something here.

Reggie Theus? Remember the risky passes, the affinity for the open shot, the classic good looks? Remember, too, the physical toughness that led him into the basket support that night at Arco Arena?

The one-time King busted up his face, put on a mask, and went back for more. He threw more fancy passes, took more bad shots, became a star of some substance, though mostly of flash. But Theus, 49, has been away from the NBA since 1991 -- about the time Larry Brown began trimming his sideburns and taking aerobics.

Sixteen years is a long, long time.

This is a big, big stretch.

The leap from college to the pros routinely chews up men far more experienced than the current New Mexico State coach. Jerry Tarkanian lasted months. P.J. Carlesimo has been waiting a decade for another chance. Lon Kruger and Tim Floyd inherited terrible teams and scooted right back to college. Mike Montgomery was smarter than everybody else, but better with the playbook than people skills. Larry Brown excelled at UCLA and won a championship at Kansas.

The list goes on, of men who tried, mostly of men who failed. Why Reggie? Why Theus over current Kings assistant Scott Brooks or Los Angeles Lakers assistant Brian Shaw? Why turn a tortured roster over to a rookie, charming and engaging and earnest though he is?

Where is Larry Brown when you really need him? When you could have hired him?

Instead, this one has the Maloofs' palms all over it -- the look of the powerful family overwhelming its weary basketball president -- except that it misses the critical point: that Geoff Petrie didn't want Larry Brown. Just didn't want him.

"Obviously he has a great record over time," Petrie said Tuesday night, "but I don't think it was the right time or the right place. He wasn't the right fit. When you start looking at all the factors ... we can't afford to have the depth of the situation that developed in Detroit or New York. We can't risk that. We decided to go with a younger coach."

Like young coaches aren't risky? Like they don't invariably get fired shortly into their first head-coaching tenure?

I'll put my money on Larry Brown every time. I'll gamble on a Hall of Fame coach knowing that he'll be gone in two years, but, hey, what a two years! He would have been a hoot and a hollerer ... and one incredible upgrade on the sideline. Who out there didn't imagine the possibilities?

Mike Bibby guarding the ball. Ron Artest put in his place in the huddle. Brad Miller badgered into shape. Francisco García, Kevin Martin and Quincy Douby schooled by the master. Draft choices coping with the culture shock of the NBA, and the shock of Larry Brown.

The Maloofs gave their blessing. Go with Larry, they said. Instead, Petrie went with Theus, long a Maloof favorite and a few notches above Brooks and Shaw on the Charismo-Meter.

"I had a long talk with (Louisville coach Rick) Pitino," Petrie said, "and I was really impressed with what he had to say. Pitino told me that he was hesitant to hire Reggie at first, but that he was so persistent, so confident that he finally said, 'I'll do it, and I was really glad I did.' He has an irrepressible spirit about him. And at the end of the day, the guy has been a head coach."

As Petrie described the protracted search, the days and nights since Stan Van Gundy's freebie flight to Sacramento, he spoke of emotional swings, innumerable interviews, untold hours on the telephone inquiring into each candidate's background. He was determined to avoid a repeat of last year's mistake, specifically the failure to contact the Golden State Warriors about Musselman.

For a few days, Brooks appeared to be the leading candidate, his blue-collar roots and straightforward approach impressing Joe and Gavin Maloof. Theus and Shaw interviewed with the family members Friday in Las Vegas, and somewhat surprisingly, the Lakers assistant was said to have been the most impressive of the two.

And then came Larry.

And there went Larry.

So here comes Theus, who last graced an NBA court -- and he never seemed to sweat, even in the final seconds of a tie game -- when Michael Jordan was en route to his first NBA championship.

While Reggie was pursuing a career in acting, television and radio, he missed the Chicago Bulls' run, the end of Larry Bird and Magic Johnson, the great Utah Jazz teams, the Houston Rockets' back-to-back titles, the San Antonio Spurs' emergence, the return of the Lakers, and the Detroit Pistons' one-season splendor under -- yes -- Larry Brown.

Brown was the best teacher, best tactician, best motivator, best coach. He would have been the better choice. Instead, here comes Reggie. Best of luck. Let's see if he can roll a seven.

They held court in Sacramento

The Kings' coaches in the Sacramento era:

Seasons Coach W-L Pct. Playoffs Pct.

85-87 Phil Johnson 51-77 .398 0-3 .000

87, 88-90 Jerry Reynolds 56-114 .330 0-0 .000

87-88 Bill Russell 17-41 .293 0-0 .000

90-91 Dick Motta 48-113 .298 0-0 .000

91-92 Rex Hughes 22-35 .386 0-0 .000

92-97 Garry St. Jean 159-236 .402 1-3 .250

97-98 Eddie Jordan 33-64 .340 0-0 .000

98-06 Rick Adelman 395-229 .633 34-35 .493

06-07 Eric Musselman 33-49 .402 0-0 .000

About the writer: Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@ sacbee.com.
 
And Petrie makes it clear:

"Obviously he has a great record over time," Petrie said Tuesday night, "but I don't think it was the right time or the right place. He wasn't the right fit. When you start looking at all the factors ... we can't afford to have the depth of the situation that developed in Detroit or New York. We can't risk that. We decided to go with a younger coach."

I loved this part:

I'll put my money on Larry Brown every time. I'll gamble on a Hall of Fame coach knowing that he'll be gone in two years, but, hey, what a two years! He would have been a hoot and a hollerer ... and one incredible upgrade on the sideline. Who out there didn't imagine the possibilities?

Mike Bibby guarding the ball. Ron Artest put in his place in the huddle. Brad Miller badgered into shape. Francisco García, Kevin Martin and Quincy Douby schooled by the master. Draft choices coping with the culture shock of the NBA, and the shock of Larry Brown.

The Maloofs gave their blessing. Go with Larry, they said.

Interesting, if highly suspect. Voisin says the Maloofs wanted Brown and yet last night on the Carmichael Dave show Gavin made it pretty clear they didn't want him.
 
LMAO Voisin seems pissed that they didn't go for her guy Larry. I mean that is just a hate filled article IMO. She didn't talk about any of the problems that Brown could've caused and all she did was bash Theus without listing any of his positives. The more I thought about it the more I've realized that Brown isn't a good fit here and wouldn't have been a good fit here.

BTW the "Mike Bibby guarding the ball, Ron Artest being put in his place, Miller becoming an athlete" comment(something like that) is pretty hilarious. Brad is who he is, he's never going to be a great athlete especially at 32. Bibby is never going to be a good/decent defender, but the way Voisin puts it she acts like Brown could've made him into some sort of Kobe stopper. Ron is who he is, if a coach like LB ripped him in the media he would explode. Then the comment about Kevin Martin+Douby+Garcia getting "schooled by the master" comment is pretty funny also. Douby+Cisco would get benched and he'd bash Kevin in the media every time he had a bad game. Larry's not the right fit here and it's that simple.
 
LMAO Voisin seems pissed that they didn't go for her guy Larry. I mean that is just a hate filled article IMO. She didn't talk about any of the problems that Brown could've caused and all she did was bash Theus without listing any of his positives. The more I thought about it the more I've realized that Brown isn't a good fit here and wouldn't have been a good fit here.

BTW the "Mike Bibby guarding the ball, Ron Artest being put in his place, Miller becoming an athlete" comment(something like that) is pretty hilarious. Brad is who he is, he's never going to be a great athlete especially at 32. Bibby is never going to be a good/decent defender, but the way Voisin puts it she acts like Brown could've made him into some sort of Kobe stopper. Ron is who he is, if a coach like LB ripped him in the media he would explode. Then the comment about Kevin Martin+Douby+Garcia getting "schooled by the master" comment is pretty funny also. Douby+Cisco would get benched and he'd bash Kevin in the media every time he had a bad game. Larry's not the right fit here and it's that simple.

I totally agree with you, I don't know what love affair Voison has with Larry Brown. The Olympics are one thing but Brown can't keep Bibby guarding the ball for an entire 82 game season. If you remember Bibby had some very nice defense in the preseason and the first 10 or so games last year then got lazy again. Second, NOBODY puts Ron Artest in his place, maybe Pat Riley...but probably not. And the young guys, Brown would hold them back, he's always been that way. I'm not saying that Theus was the best choice but I do think he was a better choice than Brown.
 
Then the comment about Kevin Martin+Douby+Garcia getting "schooled by the master" comment is pretty funny also. Douby+Cisco would get benched and he'd bash Kevin in the media every time he had a bad game. Larry's not the right fit here and it's that simple.

While I do question whether Brown still has it, I think you're confusing him with other vet coaches. Brown actually has consistantly been one of the few big name coaches to play youth a LOT. Perhaps it's because he has such a big name that it affords him the time to try to develop where young coaches don't get it? Either way there seems to be some kind of general beleif on this board that Brown didn't play young guys and it's completely wrong.

I also don't think it's fair to say he would bash Kevin to the media. Yes he got suckered into a war of words with Starbury in New York, but in general Brown's problems with players have always been more related to guys not trying hard or putting their ego before the team (or Larry's ego)... None of this sounds like anything Kevin would do (Although I can see how there could have been a Ron Ron/Larry problem)

I don't necessarily think Brown was a fantastic choice, but I don't think he should only be thought of as the coach from the Knicks two years ago. Just like I don't think He should be considered the same coach that he was 10-20 years ago because age can catch up to coaches...

All in all Voisin is accurate in stating that Theus is a huge gamble due to his inexperience (as an aside does anyone else find it terrifying that a quote we continually keep hearing is that Rick Pitino was a driving force in our coaching search? Not exactly a guy who knows what makes a successful NBA coach :eek: ) Anyways, Brown was a gamble to in his own right. Would he stay more than a year? Could he deal with the histrionics that are Ron? Was he too old for the rebuild?

Anyways in comparing the two

Theus
-Does his lack of experience prevent him from gaining credibility with players? (probly yes with a veteran)

- is he prepared do match X's and O's with vet coaches with no NBA coaching experience? (probly no)

Brown

- Will he be here longer than a year (probly no)

- Will he clash with vets and constantly cause drama searching for the spotlight? (probly yes)


Two different sets of problems there... I guess given the problems of both the cheaper more marketable option might be more appealing?
 
"Obviously he has a great record over time," Petrie said Tuesday night, "but I don't think it was the right time or the right place. He wasn't the right fit. When you start looking at all the factors ... we can't afford to have the depth of the situation that developed in Detroit or New York. We can't risk that. We decided to go with a younger coach."

Like young coaches aren't risky? Like they don't invariably get fired shortly into their first head-coaching tenure?

I'll put my money on Larry Brown every time. I'll gamble on a Hall of Fame coach knowing that he'll be gone in two years, but, hey, what a two years! He would have been a hoot and a hollerer ... and one incredible upgrade on the sideline. Who out there didn't imagine the possibilities?

Mike Bibby guarding the ball. Ron Artest put in his place in the huddle. Brad Miller badgered into shape. Francisco García, Kevin Martin and Quincy Douby schooled by the master. Draft choices coping with the culture shock of the NBA, and the shock of Larry Brown.

The Maloofs gave their blessing. Go with Larry, they said. Instead, Petrie went with Theus, long a Maloof favorite and a few notches above Brooks and Shaw on the Charismo-Meter.

While Reggie was pursuing a career in acting, television and radio, he missed the Chicago Bulls' run, the end of Larry Bird and Magic Johnson, the great Utah Jazz teams, the Houston Rockets' back-to-back titles, the San Antonio Spurs' emergence, the return of the Lakers, and the Detroit Pistons' one-season splendor under -- yes -- Larry Brown.

Brown was the best teacher, best tactician, best motivator, best coach. He would have been the better choice. Instead, here comes Reggie. Best of luck. Let's see if he can roll a seven.

As much as I don't alway agree with Aileen, when she's right, she's right. Larry Brown was the right fit, but when you have a tenative GM and risky owners, is there ever going to be "the right fit"? Let's remember, Geoff was the one who didn't want to take a chance on Artest.

It sounds like Aileen is very upset that we didn't get "her guy", but what the heck is "let's see if he can roll a seven" supposed to mean? Does she want Reggie to crap us out?

Anyway she is dead on about Larry being the best teacher, tactician, motivator, and coach. I also would've liked to see Larry "school" our youngins. Just like Aileen, I too would put my money on Larry every time. Oh well.



One note: on ESPN (who cares right?) they were talking about it and one guy said that it was a huge mistake not to hire Larry because he is so good at tearing it down in one year, and building it back up over the next two years. He said you HAVE TO GIVE HIM THE 2ND AND 3RD YEARS. He said it probably didn't work because Larry probably wanted too much personell power and too much money. It makes sense. Plus Geoff is not a risky guy, and this is probably the main reason why "it didn't work".

Geoff may be good at drafting talent, but he doesn't draft to need, and he is subpar at making solid trades and adding talent via free agency. ( I don't mind Salmons and SAR, but their contracts are WAY too long). With that said, I think the next few years are going to hinge heavily on Geoff and his decision making because Reggie isn't going to be able to come in and know exactly what to do. Reportedly, Reggie is going to sit down with Artest and Bibby and ask them what they want to do.


Why Reggie is a good choice (according to ESPN): has commanding presence, charisma, star power, and he is a hard worker. Plus the 13 years in the league. They think the fact that he grew up in Ingelwood means he will be able to take the team "head-on" which is the way it should be done.

Of course you have to take it with a grain of salt, but it is always fun to hear what the "experts" think.


I will always look back and wonder what it would've been like with Larry as our coach, but now it is time to move forward and put our hope and faith in Reggie.



(And please don't try and convince me that Larry wasn't the right choice. If over 300 posts in a thread devoted entirely to Larry didn't do it, then it isn't going to happen)
 
Re: Theus and coaching X's and O's:

1. He played in this league a long time and has seen many of the offenses (or variations thereof) as a player.

2. He is going to have an experienced coaching staff to help fill the gaps

3. He will be doing a lot of studying to fill in those gaps himself, as by what I have read he is tenacious and eager to keep learning and improving himself.

4. At the lower levels he has proven to be a good coach and improved his team significantly. Let's give him a shot and see what he does at this level.


I know a lot of the same things could be said for Muss, but everyone is different and deserves to stand on their own accomplishments and failures. Theus has a much smaller list of accomplishments, but appears to have won over Petrie as well as the Maloofs, so let's just see where this goes, shall we? The time for criticism is after failure, not before. ;)
 
Theus has a much smaller list of accomplishments, but appears to have won over Petrie as well as the Maloofs, so let's just see where this goes, shall we? The time for criticism is after failure, not before. ;)

That is so well put, I may have to consider making that my signature.
 
Re: Theus and coaching X's and O's:

1. He played in this league a long time and has seen many of the offenses (or variations thereof) as a player.

2. He is going to have an experienced coaching staff to help fill the gaps

3. He will be doing a lot of studying to fill in those gaps himself, as by what I have read he is tenacious and eager to keep learning and improving himself.

4. At the lower levels he has proven to be a good coach and improved his team significantly. Let's give him a shot and see what he does at this level.


I know a lot of the same things could be said for Muss, but everyone is different and deserves to stand on their own accomplishments and failures. Theus has a much smaller list of accomplishments, but appears to have won over Petrie as well as the Maloofs, so let's just see where this goes, shall we? The time for criticism is after failure, not before. ;)


To clarify, I never said Theus couldn't do X's and O's just that I doubted he could as well as more experienced NBA coaches like Adelman, PJ, Nelson, Riley etc. Also to counter your points:

- he played in the league a long time (and a long time ago the league has changed several times since then and the style of play is much much different than when he played.)

- He is going to have an experienced coaching staff to fill the gaps (valid but I don't know how much it helps a head coach's credibility if his assistants are having to help him with X's and O's on the fly during the game. Behind closed doors this probably will help to mitigate problems in pregame planning)

- This is true and his drive is a huge redeeming quality....but I can think of another "driven, hard-working, well-prepared coach that didn't quite ever figure out the X's nd O's of it all just one short year ago.

- I don't know if 2 years at a small college program really compares favorably to being successfull in the pros. Granted UNR was a powerhouse team last year...

I don't think it's a huge criticism to say that Theus won't be able to match X's and O's with veteran coaches. Even Avery Johnson's relative inexperience coaching was exposed this post season and he was groomed as an assistant for that particulrar job. Let's all not get so defensive that we can't call a rock a rock and point out there are elements of the hire that are a gamble. I never said he couldn't succeed or that we shouldn't judge him based on merit, just pointed out the reasons the hire was a gamble. If we're going to be fair and wait to see what he does then let's be fair and not make him infallible before he makes a decision either. I don't think anyone in this particular thread said he WOULD fail, simply that it was a gamble.
 
Re: Theus and coaching X's and O's:

1. He played in this league a long time and has seen many of the offenses (or variations thereof) as a player.

2. He is going to have an experienced coaching staff to help fill the gaps

3. He will be doing a lot of studying to fill in those gaps himself, as by what I have read he is tenacious and eager to keep learning and improving himself.

4. At the lower levels he has proven to be a good coach and improved his team significantly. Let's give him a shot and see what he does at this level.


I know a lot of the same things could be said for Muss, but everyone is different and deserves to stand on their own accomplishments and failures. Theus has a much smaller list of accomplishments, but appears to have won over Petrie as well as the Maloofs, so let's just see where this goes, shall we? The time for criticism is after failure, not before. ;)

Actually, I think it makes him the anti-Muss.

If anything, Muss came in with TOO much reliance on Xs and Os, and too much reliance on what he beleived was his system. We gave him a job because he was "so well prepared, and so well learned" on the Xs and Os front. Muss' biggeest problem was that he never earned the respect of the players, since he was not a former player or lngtime NBA pedigree players tuned him out. All the scheming in the world won't overcome the fact that you don't have control.

I will take Theus learning some scheming on the job if the flip side is that the players respect him and will play hard for him...
 
To clarify, I never said Theus couldn't do X's and O's just that I doubted he could as well as more experienced NBA coaches like Adelman, PJ, Nelson, Riley etc. Also to counter your points:

- he played in the league a long time (and a long time ago the league has changed several times since then and the style of play is much much different than when he played.)

- He is going to have an experienced coaching staff to fill the gaps (valid but I don't know how much it helps a head coach's credibility if his assistants are having to help him with X's and O's on the fly during the game. Behind closed doors this probably will help to mitigate problems in pregame planning)

- This is true and his drive is a huge redeeming quality....but I can think of another "driven, hard-working, well-prepared coach that didn't quite ever figure out the X's nd O's of it all just one short year ago.

- I don't know if 2 years at a small college program really compares favorably to being successfull in the pros. Granted UNR was a powerhouse team last year...

I don't think it's a huge criticism to say that Theus won't be able to match X's and O's with veteran coaches. Even Avery Johnson's relative inexperience coaching was exposed this post season and he was groomed as an assistant for that particulrar job. Let's all not get so defensive that we can't call a rock a rock and point out there are elements of the hire that are a gamble. I never said he couldn't succeed or that we shouldn't judge him based on merit, just pointed out the reasons the hire was a gamble. If we're going to be fair and wait to see what he does then let's be fair and not make him infallible before he makes a decision either. I don't think anyone in this particular thread said he WOULD fail, simply that it was a gamble.

Your points are well taken. I am not saying it's not a gamble (every coach is to a certain degree, some more than others), but I was just commenting on your X and O blurb.

And I doubt the game has changed THAT much. It's still basketball. He played for years at the highest level and knows all the basic plays/sets. It's how you string them together with the players you have that makes you successful.
 
Your points are well taken. I am not saying it's not a gamble (every coach is to a certain degree, some more than others), but I was just commenting on your X and O blurb.

And I doubt the game has changed THAT much. It's still basketball. He played for years at the highest level and knows all the basic plays/sets. It's how you string them together with the players you have that makes you successful.

And therein lies the problem. It really doesn't matter what coach you have when you have just enough talent to get to the playoffs, but not enough to get over the hump.

I'm looking for the development of our younger players. At this point, that is all that really matters.
 
As someone who actually wanted Brown I have to disagree strongly with Voisin. I think that Brown should have only been hired under very specific circumstances, not the least of which should have been little to no control over personal. If he wasn't willing to agree to coach kids instead of vets, rebuild, teach, and keep his hands out of personal matters then there is no way I would have wanted him to coach here. I'm glad that the Kings made the effort to contact and see what he was about. It seems like he probably wasn't willing to make certain concessions and as such I'm glad we didn't hire him.
 
No offense to Reggie

No offense but Reggie is no Larry Brown. Kings were willing to take on Artest, the trouble maker, just for youth and talent to get rid of Peja. Why wouldn't they go for Larry Brown? That's because LB is a legend and that makes them feel insecure. Understandable.
 
No offense but Reggie is no Larry Brown. Kings were willing to take on Artest, the trouble maker, just for youth and talent to get rid of Peja. Why wouldn't they go for Larry Brown? That's because LB is a legend and that makes them feel insecure. Understandable.

Reggie Theus is not pretending to be Larry Brown or Charlie Brown or anybody else. Artest has been FAR more productive on the court than Peja has since they got rid of the Serbian. The Kings organization are big boys and a "legend" like LB or any legend DOES NOT make them feel insecure - after all they expressed interest in another legend Phil Jackson as Kings head coach with the Adelman era winding down.
 
And therein lies the problem. It really doesn't matter what coach you have when you have just enough talent to get to the playoffs, but not enough to get over the hump.

I'm looking for the development of our younger players. At this point, that is all that really matters.

I know it does. That's the reason I mentioned it. ;)

It's the point I've been trying to make. The team Reggie has to work with is the one we have, not the one we want to have, no matter how hard we collectively want it. The leaders are who they are, whether "true" leaders or not. Mike is who he is defensively, and likewise for Ron-Ron mentally. :eek: Just work with the cards you are dealt and smile while doing it....

He has already stated that Garcia was misused last year and he plans to work on that, so baby steps in the right direction are being planted as we type.
 
Phil is not a trouble maker

Reggie Theus is not pretending to be Larry Brown or Charlie Brown or anybody else. Artest has been FAR more productive on the court than Peja has since they got rid of the Serbian. The Kings organization are big boys and a "legend" like LB or any legend DOES NOT make them feel insecure - after all they expressed interest in another legend Phil Jackson as Kings head coach with the Adelman era winding down.

You're right. Just because a coach is a legend does not make management insecure. But Phil has never been a trouble maker. LB is a trouble maker who is worth it just like Artest if you're man enough to take him on.
The reason the Maloofs couldn't get Phil is because they didn't have a hot daughter like Buss.
 
The reason the Maloofs couldn't get Phil is because they didn't have a hot daughter like Buss.

No, but they could have easily procured him any hot chick he wanted anytime in Las Vegas - because what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas:D
 
Media Made Brown then Took him down

The media was all over Brown making him some kind of Yoda after the Pistons won the big one. I think that he didn't want to become some kind of media creation and become idolized. He wants to say to the world, I'm not what you think I am and became a bad boy. Then the media jumped and dumped all over him once he showed that he doesn't want to be their golden boy. He gave us what we yearned for that brief moment when the Pistons won-underdogs pulling together and won with heart and class. I will never forget that moment and so I will never give up on Brown no matter what the media does. I would be a big Kings fan again if they hired LB. Then, I still have hope. Now I'll probably tune out if we start out this next season the same way we started last season. The Maloofs will eat some losses in ticket sales for a few years. People will forget about the Kings again. We need a new Chris Webber in the Sequel. We need a gifted player with supreme confidence and swagger.
 
The media was all over Brown making him some kind of Yoda after the Pistons won the big one. I think that he didn't want to become some kind of media creation and become idolized. He wants to say to the world, I'm not what you think I am and became a bad boy. Then the media jumped and dumped all over him once he showed that he doesn't want to be their golden boy. He gave us what we yearned for that brief moment when the Pistons won-underdogs pulling together and won with heart and class. I will never forget that moment and so I will never give up on Brown no matter what the media does.

I so cannot understand how you can blame all of Brown's problems on the evil media. The media didn't force Brown into mismanaging the Olympics squad. The media certainly didn't compel Brown to so mishandle the whole Knicks situation that they paid him a gazillion dollars just to leave.

I would be a big Kings fan again if they hired LB. Then, I still have hope. Now I'll probably tune out if we start out this next season the same way we started last season. The Maloofs will eat some losses in ticket sales for a few years. People will forget about the Kings again. We need a new Chris Webber in the Sequel. We need a gifted player with supreme confidence and swagger.

Sorry, but I know of people who are reconsidering their decisions about season tickets solely because of Reggie Theus being hired as coach. I don't think there's any way to predict the Kings will eat losses in ticket sales. If Theus, Petrie and the Maloofs can assemble a team that puts energy and hunger on the court, the fans will continue to show up in droves.

Yes, we need a gifted player with confidence and swagger AND hunger, but every journey starts with a single step. I firmly believe the selection of Theus was a step in the right direction for a change.
 
Im not really anticipating a major improvement for the 07-08 season but if reggie shows he can get his basketball philosophy through to our group of guys and everyone knows their particular role, and we stick to one style of play I think we could could have a bright future, but I was never for reggie or L. Brown, I wanted svg/terry porter, but now that Reggie thesus is here me being the loyal kings fan i am, I can't hope but for the best, heck i even bought a gold and purple jersey for kings sake, even though the skys are cloudy, all teams go through this phase the Boston C's and recently the L.A. smakers we have to lose b4 we win I hope R.T. can bring us back to the glory days & this time push us to our first title here in sacto....no thanks larry:cool:=
WELCOME REGGIE T.
 
I think it depends on what you call a "major improvement." If it means we'll have players actually looking like a team again, playing with energy and heart, then that will be a vast improvement. If we have a coach who actually talks directly to the players and not through a layer of assistant coaches, that will be a vast improvement. If we have rotation patterns that you can even partially understand, that will be a vast improvement.

We aren't gonna vault back into elite status overnight but I think we can finally quit bailing quite so much and worry about getting the ship headed back in the right direction.

Remember, when you're up to your arse in alligators it's hard to remember your original objective was to drain the swamp.