...Silver listened as debate raged between NBA owners, a phalanx of lawyers and Stern; the point of contention was whether ownership would allow the Sacramento Kings to be sold to a group that would move the team more than 625 miles north to Seattle. In the balance was an astounding franchise price of $406 million, along with a relocation fee rumored to be around $75 million, which would be split among ownership.
None of that mattered to Silver as he surgically cut through the posturing, pushing to keep the Kings in California and sending a message to owners and the fans about the importance of franchise stability.
I enjoyed the article but was surprised when it said the local group had to refund hansens $30M among other things. I read or saw an interview with Hansen about a month after where he denied having been paid back the $30M. He said something like "I have to decide how far to push without sueing" or words to that effect. Has that loop ever been closed? Or was Hansen....gasp.... Lying???
I'm interested in that too.. But it didn't sound to me like the author of that article definitively knew for certain or was somewhat postulating
Are you drew garrison? If so, how sure are you about the $30M refund to Hansen? Like unsaid, Hansen was denying having received it - I think it was an interview on Seattle TV - the same one where he said the whole thing made him sick to his stomach and that he would not be in a predator position again. I don't have a link sorry.What did you call me?![]()
On topic 1: Thanks to Mr. Silver!
On topic 2: I read somewhere that the owners offered Hansen the $30M and he turned it down. I remember because I was surprised at the time.