Despite the firing, and subsequent slide, teams were caught off guard early by the Kings. They weren't that good (and the FO knew it) and they aren't this bad. You don't blow up a promising team: you cut off it's head and let the team run crazy for awhile. Then you add another important draft pick and get your guy who you want at the helm.
I am frustrated like everyone else, but there is a plan. They are clearly tanking the season because there is absolutely no reason to have success when a potentially high draft pick is on the line and the playoffs are absolutely out of the question.
I can understand clinging to this type of hope. Because it would imply that we have a front office that is competent and operating with a plan vs one that is incompetent and is failing to produce the results they expected.
But there are several flaws with this line of thinking.
(1) D'Alessandro thinks he put together a very talented team. The one thing I took away from that morning at KHTK talking to D'Alessandro before the event and listening to his answers both on and off air is that he absolutely thinks he has a more competitive roster than the fans or NBA analysts do. There was some smoke blowing to be sure, but overall he really felt the team was under performing under Malone.
(2) The Kings could have openly tanked. No one would have blamed them for tearing the team apart and accumulating cap room and draft picks. Philly fans may be getting frustrated wondering how many years they are going to tank but they get it. So do Celtics fans who watched Ainge do this once before. I was almost shocked the Kings didn't try to completely rebuild with a goal of turning it around when the new arena opened. Instead they've been trying to retool on the fly and win right away. Why else would you have an owner openly telling fans that last season wasn't about wins and losses but this season would be? Or that he expected the team to win more games under Corbin and make the playoffs? That's not just normal owner marketing. Because Vivek could have talked about going a different direction and having patience etc etc. Clearly he believed that Malone was actually holding the team back. And my hunch is that it's because D'Alessandro convinced him of that fact.
(3) There isn't really a high draft pick on the line. It took Detroit's resurrection, Charlotte going 8-2 over their last 10 and the Kings losing six straight just to get to the 9th worst record in the NBA. The Kings are still a mini run away from being the 11th worst team in the league and losing their pick to Chicago. And even if they keep it, they'll still likely be in the 7-10 range which is important because
(4) D'Alessandro has yet to prove that he's got a good eye for talent in the draft. Ben has come around but was awful last year and pretty much fell in the Kings lap anyway. Stauskas? He was only a need pick if they thought their lottery pick from the previous year was a bust candidate and if they thought he was the best player available then Payton, Nurkic, McDaniels, LaVine, Bogdananovic, Napier and even Saric say hi. Saric would have been an ideal "tank" pick, which is exactly why Hinkie drafted him.
(5) There's always a "high" draft pick on the line. You're either in the playoffs or in the lottery. A late lottery pick this year likely won't yield the superstar the Kings need to turn things around. I'd love it if it were the case but if they are in the lottery again this year that will make nine straight years. If that were the way to success the Kings should have found it by now. In the last 8 lotteries the Kings have selected 17 players. Cousins, Thompson, McLemore, McCallum and Stauskas are still on the team. Casspi happens to be back with the Kings. Hawes, Singletary, Ewing, Pendergraph, Evans, Freddette, Honeycutt, Thomas, Johnson, and Robinson are all gone. So are any players we actually got in return when any of those guys left.
(6) Another year with the Chicago obligation hanging over the Kings is another year where they are handcuffed in terms of making trades. I'm never a fan of trading 1st rounders unless you're already a playoff team but it's at least a tool to have in your arsenal. The Kings have been mentioned as trying to butt into pretty much every major deal in the NBA over the last few years and haven't pulled off a single one. One large reason why is that they can't offer 1st round draft picks and other teams can. And before anyone mentions Rudy Gay, remember that that wasn't a bidding war. NO other teams were willing to take on his enormous contract given his offensive inefficiency in Toronto. That was a different type of trade.
(7) Lastly and most importantly, you run the risk of alienating the one guy you claim to be building around. This is DeMarcus Cousins' fifth season and despite how good he's become as a player he has yet to make an all-star game, an All-NBA team or play a single playoff game. How much tanking before he decides he's wasting his career in Sacramento?