Yep, sounds like Kuminga Bonzi'd himself.Yeah, my understanding was he turned down significantly more a year ago not realizing that the market would be what it is today. I don't think it's changing because teams are comfortable paying up to and around the first apron but not going over since that functionally locks their roster down. So he is the first that has to blink and then we see what the Dubs do. I am fine saddling them with a contract for a guy they don't want like that, and then maybe they trade him later.
wrt to the BYC I guess the trade moratorium is the second hurdle, IIRC the longer the Warriors wait they risk him not being able to be traded before the deadline which I believe was the point of no return that the Jazz got to with Lauri?
I don't really know what the Jazz/Markkanen situation was, I was always under the impression they wanted to build around him, but since the Kings weren't really likely to grab him I didn't follow any rumors too closely. That said, it's pretty risky to sign a guy to a contract bigger than you want to (particularly a contract that hamstrings you) in hopes of trading him down the road. Barring a handshake deal already in place to make a specific trade on Dec. 15th that would help GSW get back under the apron in a way that was acceptable to them, I wouldn't advocate signing him to $25M just because he wants it. Imagine the heat that the Kings FO would get if they signed a player to a deal bigger than they had to, simply in hopes of making a trade down the road. I think that the Perry honeymoon era would end really fast.
Of course, given the way everything looks from a public-facing point of view, what the Warriors *should* do is just decline to match when Kuminga ultimately caves and signs in Sacramento for the MLE.
