[NCAAB] Michael Malone hired as next coach of UNC

Very nice. I said that would be the logical choice rather than Donovan and reassured some UNC fans over the weekend that he wasn't "just Jokic" by pointing to the season he got fired and how hot the Kings were before Boogie's illness.

I like this for them. Maybe for Veesaar too if he stays.
 
Very nice. I said that would be the logical choice rather than Donovan and reassured some UNC fans over the weekend that he wasn't "just Jokic" by pointing to the season he got fired and how hot the Kings were before Boogie's illness.

I like this for them. Maybe for Veesaar too if he stays.
The one concern I’d have is that Mike Malone’s never really hit the recruiting trail before like Billy Donovan has but that’s not really a huge concern when you’re the school Michael freaking Jordan went to.

Oh to be a fly on the wall during the athletic program meetings with Michael Malone and Belichick in them
 
The one concern I’d have is that Mike Malone’s never really hit the recruiting trail before like Billy Donovan has but that’s not really a huge concern when you’re the school Michael freaking Jordan went to.

Oh to be a fly on the wall during the athletic program meetings with Michael Malone and Belichick in them
NIL has kind of made blue blood status meaningless I think we're seeing that with some of the B1G and SEC teams that are historically around 10-25 becoming top programs. I really am unsure how much weight "MJ's school" carries with Gen Z and Alpha. Too much recency bias towards some of the other schools I think.

One of the better parts of this hire is they don't have to waste money on a buyout and can pump that $4m plus right into NIL.
 
Very nice. I said that would be the logical choice rather than Donovan and reassured some UNC fans over the weekend that he wasn't "just Jokic" by pointing to the season he got fired and how hot the Kings were before Boogie's illness.

I like this for them. Maybe for Veesaar too if he stays.
I've always thought that Malone was a hell of a coach. He's consistently elevated the level of play of his players, and college is more about building than maintaining nowadays - the really good players are gone in a year or two. I think recruiting might actually go well for him because he can always search for a specific type of player and get him pretty quickly, as opposed to the NBA where roster construction takes a little more time. As far as "recency bias" goes, it wasn't that long ago that the Nuggets were hoisting the trophy, so he has that going for him.
 
NIL has kind of made blue blood status meaningless I think we're seeing that with some of the B1G and SEC teams that are historically around 10-25 becoming top programs. I really am unsure how much weight "MJ's school" carries with Gen Z and Alpha. Too much recency bias towards some of the other schools I think.
NIL has changed things a lot, but I'd say that in general it's to the detriment of the mid-majors more than the Blue Bloods.

College is a very different beast (for example, recruiting is such a major factor) so I suppose we will see whether Malone makes a graceful transition or not, but it seems like the Venn diagram of good college coaches and good NBA coaches does not overlap a whole lot.

I wouldn't even want to judge where Malone is at until at least two years in, since he's already a step behind in recruitment for this cycle. Yes, I would assume that UNC has a "GM" position that at least offers some measure of continuity to recruits, but right now there are presumably zero kids that have an established relationship with Malone so it will be hard to recruit "his" program from the jump. I'd expect a lot of mercenaries - high-talent, high-$$-ask, questionable fit guys - for at least the first season.
 
NIL has changed things a lot, but I'd say that in general it's to the detriment of the mid-majors more than the Blue Bloods.
Blue Bloods are always going to be top 25 programs (ok, LOL UCLA). The thing NIL is rapidly changing is that football money is coming in and giving a lot of schools where basketball was nice to have in the offseason into major players on the recruiting trail. You are right it is costing mid-majors as this leads to a ton of money floating around to poach students who don't leave for the Association but show growth potential. But it also means the SEC and B1G are going to throw tons of money around and compete with "the school recruits itself" programs if they don't have a top tier coach.

And the ACC is now in the weakest spot of all the Power Conferences. I thought Yormark should have really pushed to get Duke and UNC into his super basketball conference at all costs but looking at the revenue splits brought up in the Tommy Lloyd saga it seems that even "basketball schools" are seeing 4x the money in football so naturally being SEC doormats in all but basketball is probably going to be preferable to those schools.
 
Back
Top