Mark Kreidler: Team needs Petrie to get well soon

EmKingsFan4

Starter
Mark Kreidler: Team needs Petrie to get well soon



By Mark Kreidler -- Bee Sports Columnist
Published 2:15 am PDT Friday, May 6, 2005


Great: Another Kings week, another Kings injury.



This time it's Geoff Petrie's ticker. But look at it this way: It's the first solid block the Kings have had in weeks.

Someone on Thursday came to talk to me about Petrie's blocked artery, which required an angioplasty procedure Wednesday afternoon at a Sacramento hospital and included the insertion of a stent to prevent a regrowth of the plaque.



"Good thing it wasn't serious," my friend said, thus proving that it wasn't his artery that got invaded.

An artery that is 95 percent blocked in anybody is a serious thing, and if you want to get perfectly perverse about it, allow yourself to be happy on Petrie's behalf that the Kings went out of the postseason in the first round. Petrie had for a month been feeling tightness in his chest when he ran or jogged, but put off seeing anyone about it until the Kings were eliminated.

Hey, you know what? That team finally did the man some good.

With the Kings out and Petrie home, the modern miracles began. We go on all the time about the wonders of arthroscopic surgery, but Petrie went in for a test, was diagnosed, had a coronary angioplasty performed and was all done by 5:30 Wednesday afternoon. Now that's heart smart.

A member of the Kings' staff who visited with him Wednesday evening, in fact, said that Petrie appeared well enough to come in to work.

Better not let that get around. Don't want the man known as a slacker.

"He looked great," said assistant coach Pete Carril, who may be Petrie's closest friend and who coached him as a player in college at Princeton. "He looked 10 years younger.

"You know, that kind of stuff wears on you," added Carril, and he ought to know. Five years ago almost exactly, it was Carril who, after a scare at the Kings' offices in Arco Arena, underwent a procedure to reduce blockage in an artery.

"Now we're even in stents, at one apiece," Carril said with a chuckle.

Of course, the coach still leads Petrie in coronary bypasses, 3-0.

Guess Carril's not one to taunt.

Kings co-owner Joe Maloof knew something was up Wednesday, because Petrie uncharacteristically failed to return promptly his call to begin discussing offseason moves for the franchise.

"Luckily, he's OK," Maloof said. "He'll be laid up for about two weeks, where he can't exercise much, but otherwise he's fine to talk and everything like that."

The Kings certainly have enough to talk about, beginning - and at this point ending - with the Phil Jackson question.

Maloof was uncharacteristically evasive on the subject Thursday afternoon - "We need to talk to Geoff about that. We'll see. I don't know yet," he said at one point - and with good reason: The Maloofs had already decided they wanted to contact Jackson's agent and gauge Jackson's interest in coaching the Kings.

But true to their relationship with Petrie, they needed to run it by him first.

And they will need Petrie's counsel again and again before the Jackson scenario plays itself out, in all its comic glory.

People say that the one person the Kings cannot afford to lose is not a player, but Petrie. The thing is, most of those people don't know how right they are - or why.

Petrie judges talent as well as anybody in the league, but that's obvious. He has acquired some seriously good players over the years (Chris Webber, Mike Bibby), and also some players undervalued by other teams (Doug Christie, Bobby Jackson).

But Petrie is of equal value elsewhere, and most people never see it. He's the off-the-court leader of the franchise, quiet but intensely competitive. He wants to win at everything, all the time. He'd smother you in a game of tennis even if you had the drop on him, speed-wise.

Well, maybe not this week.

(Note to self: Schedule tennis with Petrie for this afternoon.)

Petrie is also the voice of reason within the Kings' offices, and nowhere does that come more critically into play than at a time like this, with the whole Phil Jackson thing about to go full-tilt and set off emotional flashpoints all over the place. Petrie is the best, absolutely the best, at waiting until the shouting dies down in order to really think about what needs to be done.

If the Maloofs want Phil Jackson pursued, then Petrie is the guy to do it. But Petrie is also the man to remind the Maloofs why Rick Adelman was the coach in the first place, to honestly examine just how competitive the Kings can be expect to be over the next couple of seasons, and to help Joe and Gavin try to figure how to get $10 million worth of winning out of a coach each year.

And he'll do it, Petrie will. It's a strong heartbeat that comes from the guy. He can't get well too soon.

http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/basketball/kings/story/12846009p-13695638c.html
 
Geoff said:
Voisin, take note: THIS is how you write a freakin' column.

The last time Kreidler actually stuck his neck out and didn't write a fluff piece for the Kings was a long time ago.
 
Yes, we need Petrie to get well soon so he can get his butt back to work and put together the Sacramento Kings '05 - '06 World Championship Team.
 
If the Maloofs want Phil Jackson pursued, then Petrie is the guy to do it. But Petrie is also the man to remind the Maloofs why Rick Adelman was the coach in the first place, to honestly examine just how competitive the Kings can be expect to be over the next couple of seasons, and to help Joe and Gavin try to figure how to get $10 million worth of winning out of a coach each year.

And he'll do it, Petrie will. It's a strong heartbeat that comes from the guy. He can't get well too soon.

I continue to respect Mark Kreidler and his ability to be the truth out there without an agenda.

Ryle - You can write a column without having to make someone out the villian. Kreidler is putting the facts out and letting the readers judge.

What's interesting is that the new Sports Editor for the Bee did something very novel, at least for Bee Sports ...

He put two divergent options by the two most popular sports columnists under the same banner. Present two sides of the coin and let the reader decide which, if either, they agree with or believe.
 
You I know, I think that even though 10million/yr sounds crazy,

I guess if you look positively we forget that coach's salary is not salary cap related and will not incur a cap penalty.
 
EmKingsFan4 said:
The Kings certainly have enough to talk about, beginning - and at this point ending - with the Phil Jackson question.

Maloof was uncharacteristically evasive on the subject Thursday afternoon - "We need to talk to Geoff about that. We'll see. I don't know yet," he said at one point - and with good reason: The Maloofs had already decided they wanted to contact Jackson's agent and gauge Jackson's interest in coaching the Kings.

But true to their relationship with Petrie, they needed to run it by him first.

And they will need Petrie's counsel again and again before the Jackson scenario plays itself out, in all its comic glory.

If the Maloofs want Phil Jackson pursued, then Petrie is the guy to do it. But Petrie is also the man to remind the Maloofs why Rick Adelman was the coach in the first place, to honestly examine just how competitive the Kings can be expect to be over the next couple of seasons, and to help Joe and Gavin try to figure how to get $10 million worth of winning out of a coach each year.

And he'll do it, Petrie will. It's a strong heartbeat that comes from the guy. He can't get well too soon.

http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/basketball/kings/story/12846009p-13695638c.html

I'm still not really sure how I feel about this whole PJ thing. I like Rick, I respect what he has done with what he had to work with. He reached some impressive landmarks this year. But I know there is something lacking. I get frustrated by his rotations and wonder why he's under using some of the assets he has when he has "put them in the doghouse"...

BUT is Phil better?? I don't like the man. I don't like the mind games or the attitude...then again, he has the rings...

THANK GOD Geoff Petrie gets to make these decisions and not me.


For you stat lovers: as of 2003...

PJ

CAREER COACHING
REGULAR SEASONPOST SEASON YEARTEAMWINSLOSSESPCTWINSLOSSESPCT 1989Chicago5527.671106.625 1990Chicago6121.744152.882 1991Chicago6715.817157.682 1992Chicago5725.695154.789 1993Chicago5527.67164.600 1994Chicago4735.57355.500 1995Chicago7210.878153.833 1996Chicago6913.841154.789 1997Chicago6220.756156.714 1999L.A. Lakers6715.817158.652 2000L.A. Lakers5626.683151.938 2001L.A. Lakers5824.707154.789 2002L.A. Lakers5032.61066.500 2003L.A. Lakers5626.683139.591 TOTALS832316.72517569.717







okay, that's just not right, they don't list RA's....

here's the page..http://www.nba.com/coachfile/rick_adelman/index.html?nav=page
 
Is Phil better?

It depends on what you're comparing...

Can he get a team with multiple HOFers to the championships? Yes. Is that better? Not unless you give Adelman multiple HOFers and see what he can do with them.

Sorry, Prophetess, but I don't look at rings as the bottom line of whether or not someone is better AND it wouldn't matter anyway...

IMHO PJ honestly and truly thinks Sacramento (the town) is beneath him. It doesn't have the bright lights of the big city. It doesn't have the theatres, the restaurants, the Jack Nicholsons, etc. He'll end up in New York or Los Angeles because he can...

When you start talking about how Adelman hasn't done it, look again at game 7. He did everything he could - it wasn't RA standing on the free throw line missing shot after shot after shot.

But, as is always the case...Players win games, coaches lose them.

I don't like the type of team Phil Jackson runs. I am not going to kiss his rings.
 
Vf.. believe me I wasn't saying he was a better coach. and I wasn't even implying that I want him here. I feel about him the same way you do. I was just trying to give a very neutral view point and some stats to compare for those who wanted to.

UNFORTUNATELY, it seems they don't think RA is worth listing stats for...
 
Back
Top