Lame by comparison: Kings.com

[NoBonus]

After the draft lottery, I decided to cruise over to blazer.com and sonics.com and low and behold, their websites were excellent! Blazers.com has a shadow profile, quote and built in video of each player for their roster screen. Kings.com either shows you a tiny head shot or a statistical roster... why must Kings.com be so business oriented and boring? C'mon!

Check them out for yourselves!

www.nba.com/blazers

www.nba.com/sonics

www.nba.com/kings

 

[vytzka]

Bah, I can't stand those webpages overloaded with Flash, where it's impossible to see anything over the sheer chaos of the so called design, and it's slow like a Galapago turtle. Even kings.com seems overcrowded for me.

 

[BMiller52]

Our whole roster is business orientated and boring.

 

[creAtivetfh]

im sure Kings.com would have done something special if they landed the 1st or 2nd pick. Pointless thread IMO

 

[kennadog]

I looked. The Blazers site was horrible to me. So much moving crap that it hurt my eyes/head after, oh...two seconds and I had to leave it. The Sonics doesn't appear to be better or worse than the Kings site to me. The Kings site actually looked like it had more flash than the Sonics and almost too busy for me.

 

[fnordius]

im sure Kings.com would have done something special if they landed the 1st or 2nd pick. Pointless thread IMO

Whichever design you prefer, I'm sure that the Sonics and Blazers didn't redo their sites in the last 20 hours.

 

[Spike]

Most sites nowadays try to do too much. Less is more, I say.