RKid
Bench
For a long time now, I ve considered the story of the Nash led Phoenix Suns to have many parallels to the story of your Webber led Sacramento Kings. So I would really like Kings fans opinions of what the Suns should do this moment.
(obviously a lot of people might not agree with the comparison and thats fine, but I see a comparison so tell me why there isnt one)
The Suns (as of right now) are in the position that your Kings were a few years ago (I would date it to 2004) good enough to remain competetive, but not good enough to win the big one.
So what would you do if you ran the Suns?
I would tear the sucker down. They have players that together suck major balls, but alone are talents. Nash, Amare(extremely overated), Hill, Richardson, Shaq, Barbosa, and others may fetch a lot from teams clearing cap space for 2010 or from contenders trying to get to the next level.
Imagine if the Kings would have traded their major pieces after 2004, would the Kings be in a better place now rather than be mired in what is probably a long and painful rebuilding process?
Thoughts?
(obviously a lot of people might not agree with the comparison and thats fine, but I see a comparison so tell me why there isnt one)
The Suns (as of right now) are in the position that your Kings were a few years ago (I would date it to 2004) good enough to remain competetive, but not good enough to win the big one.
So what would you do if you ran the Suns?
I would tear the sucker down. They have players that together suck major balls, but alone are talents. Nash, Amare(extremely overated), Hill, Richardson, Shaq, Barbosa, and others may fetch a lot from teams clearing cap space for 2010 or from contenders trying to get to the next level.
Imagine if the Kings would have traded their major pieces after 2004, would the Kings be in a better place now rather than be mired in what is probably a long and painful rebuilding process?
Thoughts?