Grade the deadline (2025 edition)

Grade Monte’s trade deadline


  • Total voters
    79
#31
Knowing this organization will never pull the trigger on a full reset (at least in its current state) it's hard to be mad.

From my vantage point our franchise is still a laughingstock and punching bag around the league for a lot of teams in sorrier states than we are, so I would like to at least get this franchise back to respectable before we attempt an uglier rebuild.

Especially with Domas and Keegan.

But we can and should re-evaluate our options the next two offseasons if things go sideways. Good news is once that pick conveys to ATL we have full control. Most teams that went all in on 5-10 seeded rosters will have far longer pain periods with nothing to show.
I would kill for a 5-seed!
 
#34
B-/C+

on the Fox trade Monte should have traded him this summer to move up in the draft knowing he was leaving or the moment he signed with Klutch. He had to get a starter caliber forward for Fox and he failed to do so.

on the Val trade we shall see what he has left. He is 32 and at career lows in most categories. My bb industry contact thinks he is cooked and it was a horrible trade. On the other hand Domas can’t play the whole game.

Laravia was either a great trade or a lot for a very short term rental. We need the extra length and I think he is a longer Huerter who was a better player than many give him credit for on defense.

I think the parts are there for a good team especially if we can get Simmons in the buy out market but a really good chance also exists we are a 9/10 playin team and made just enough poor moves to lose our draft pick.

tough being a Kings fan.
 
#35
on the Val trade we shall see what he has left. He is 32 and at career lows in most categories. My bb industry contact thinks he is cooked and it was a horrible trade. On the other hand Domas can’t play the whole game.
Seems like a fairly extreme view by your bb industry contract on JV. Given is having basically exactly the same season as he always has. Even if you don't adjust for per 36, he's the epitome of a consistent performer. Obviously you aren't getting a defensive savant, but you're getting the same scoring and rebounding as always with him this year. Any particular observation on his game your insider has?
 
#36
Seems like a fairly extreme view by your bb industry contract on JV. Given is having basically exactly the same season as he always has. Even if you don't adjust for per 36, he's the epitome of a consistent performer. Obviously you aren't getting a defensive savant, but you're getting the same scoring and rebounding as always with him this year. Any particular observation on his game your insider has?
I graded A+. The house was on fire and it was an emergency situation.
Zach is reborn.
JV was a starter for many good teams until this season. JV is consistent and available unless somebody breaks too many bones in different parts of his body.
LaRavia is an unknown, but we had NOBODY from the bench before him.

Once again - it's A+ cause it was an emergency and all the new acquisitions were made to salvage the season.
 
#37
We have some flexibility in the off season to totally change the team make up if we so choose. For example, no one wants Ben Simmons at 40 mil but at 12? Maybe. Lavine could be moved to a team like Orlando which would be a perfect fit for him, some length and size could maybe be had there. Or packsge Deebo and some picks for a bigger swing. Plenty of opportunities to raise the ceiling of this team moving forward.
 

Warhawk

Give blood and save a life!
Staff member
#39
Doesnt change the return. It's why it's a B and not a C.
While I get this thought process, Luka just netted an oft-broken center likely past his prime and one pick. Not a whole lot of good firsts being bandied about, either. Fox (as inconsistent of a star as he was and with an injured hand) has us over a barrel and it was either lose him for what we got now or lose him for even less this summer, possibly with him shutting it down the rest of the year to heal. Just because the return wasn't what you wanted doesn't mean it wasn't objectively good overall.

I like JV as a backup center overall. While he and Sabonis aren't rim protectors, they are strong rebounding machines and tend to do OK offensively on their own. They certainly won't get bullied.

LaRavia seems like a decent backup 3/4 (I'm not really familiar with him, but that's what I'm gathering). We had a short term need and filled it at relatively low cost. If he pans out this year, hopefully we can get him to sign on for another contract.

While I would have liked "more" (and who wouldn't, in any trade!), I think we got a decent return for the hand we were dealt. I'm not going to hold it against someone for factors outside their control.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#40
While I get this thought process, Luka just netted an oft-broken center likely past his prime and one pick. Not a whole lot of good firsts being bandied about, either. Fox (as inconsistent of a star as he was and with an injured hand) has us over a barrel and it was either lose him for what we got now or lose him for even less this summer, possibly with him shutting it down the rest of the year to heal. Just because the return wasn't what you wanted doesn't mean it wasn't objectively good overall.

I like JV as a backup center overall. While he and Sabonis aren't rim protectors, they are strong rebounding machines and tend to do OK offensively on their own. They certainly won't get bullied.

LaRavia seems like a decent backup 3/4 (I'm not really familiar with him, but that's what I'm gathering). We had a short term need and filled it at relatively low cost. If he pans out this year, hopefully we can get him to sign on for another contract.

While I would have liked "more" (and who wouldn't, in any trade!), I think we got a decent return for the hand we were dealt. I'm not going to hold it against someone for factors outside their control.
But Dallas's GM targeted that broken center. And then took LA's weaker offer. Many teams would have given up more for Luka even with all the fitness/injury concern Dallas apparently has.

May have possibly been the same thing as Kings FO targeting Buddy Hield.
 

Warhawk

Give blood and save a life!
Staff member
#41
But Dallas's GM targeted that broken center. And then took LA's weaker offer. Many teams would have given up more for Luka even with all the fitness/injury concern Dallas apparently has.

May have possibly been the same thing as Kings FO targeting Buddy Hield.
Maybe so. But every year we see trades where we wonder "what the heck is going on" and "why didn't we get in on that" when good players get traded for a lot less (or a lot more!) than we thought they would get. Sometimes we've made offers that others spurned that we actually think is better, but that doesn't mean that the other team sees similar value for whatever reason (players offered, which years the picks are, etc.). I'm not going to get so obsessed with minutiae over it. I have more important things to do.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#42
Maybe so. But every year we see trades where we wonder "what the heck is going on" and "why didn't we get in on that" when good players get traded for a lot less (or a lot more!) than we thought they would get. Sometimes we've made offers that others spurned that we actually think is better, but that doesn't mean that the other team sees similar value for whatever reason (players offered, which years the picks are, etc.). I'm not going to get so obsessed with minutiae over it. I have more important things to do.
Of course but the Luka deal is widely being panned as one of the worst deals ever (I think like the Joe Barry Carroll trade is still probably the worst all time) and it has been stated in full open clarity that Nico wanted one player and one player only for Luka. And not one GM around the league has admitted to being contacted if that is untrue.

There's a lot of weird deals every deadline but this one is pretty special and I don't think you can compare it to even our trade, or the ones involving past their prime guys like Butler.
 
#43
Gets a meh from me.

I understand if the franchise wasn't ready to immediately scrap the team, and if we want to have a short term goal of making the playoffs this year; ok. I hope we make progress in the off season with cleaning up the roster; win-now guys need to go. Players with potential, and good leaders may still have a role.
 
#44
We have some flexibility in the off season to totally change the team make up if we so choose. For example, no one wants Ben Simmons at 40 mil but at 12? Maybe. Lavine could be moved to a team like Orlando which would be a perfect fit for him, some length and size could maybe be had there. Or packsge Deebo and some picks for a bigger swing. Plenty of opportunities to raise the ceiling of this team moving forward.
guard for forward trades are hard to pull off.
 
#48
Starting unit: C
Bench: A
Overall: Undecided

We haven't addressed the wing, the weakest spot that could tip the balance of being a mediocre or solid PO team.
I am happy the drama is over, can focus on the game and ride a rollercoaster again high or low.
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
#55
I like the Valanciunas and LaRavia pickups, I'd say maybe a B+ for those moves. But I hate going out and getting Zach LaVine for this team so much that it averages out to a D for me. That's not an option so I picked F.

Obviously Fox needed to be traded but even without him we had guard depth with Monk, Ellis, McLaughlin, and Carter. Bringing in Zach effectively kills any chance that Keon Ellis gets his starting SG role back, that's strike one. He also shoots too much for Keegan Murray to develop into a third option, that's strike two. And he makes too much money to move him in the future without also sending out draft picks to sweeten the pot. Monte was behind the 8 ball, that's not his fault. Choosing maybe the worst option imaginable certainly is his fault.
 
#56
Deadline moves were great!

Fox is no where near Lavine plus firsts. Now, consider the fractured hand. Fox is not a good passer and is not a good 3pt shooter. Lavine at least improves the shooting (over 44% before trade). Monk isnthe pg, so we needed a sg. While Lavine like all players has warts, he adds much needed height and athleticism.

Colby makes some of the worst plays and has been terri le this year. We didn't need him playing at all, at all because those are Carter's mins who is much better.

We do need a ballhandler, but McLaughlin never showed too much and couldn't handle a press. We have 3 roster spots and pg isn't a pressing need for many teams. Today Charolette.signed Elfrid Payton to a 10 day. I could see Reggie Jackson or other options working from the buyout market.

The greatest impact is moving Huerter. I couldn't wait for the day he was gone and I never had to watch another brick. LaRavia is shooting 44%. Huerter was bad at just about everything. We whine and complain about getting a wing and now we got one, yet it doesn't matter even if he is a better rebounder, passer, defender, scorer, etc.. We added height, versatility, and more importantly toughness.

Hrdboild says shots will be taken away from Keegan. Keegs had plenty of opportunities last night and it is on the coach to make sure he gets looks. Keegan's shot is coming back to form, but what is pissing everyone off about Keegs and was said repeatedly is him playing soft, lacking toughness, and aggression.

Val is much better for this team than Len. Val has experience with DDR, and we finally got a capable big that can score and provide relief for Sabonis as shown last night. It would have hurt my eyes to see Len play when Sabonis fouled out. Coach wouldn't even trust him and would have likely played Lyles. While Val played for Wash so his stats are padded (collecting Poole and Kuzma's bricks). We again added strength, rebounding, and length and toughness.

As a team we NEEDED height, athleticism, toughness, rebounding, bench scoring, and improved shooting and these were all improved.
 
#58
Apparently we need a PG now? It’s Monte super secret plan to draft another guard in the draft lol
Who on the team is a pg?

Monk is the primary ball-handler, but do you consider him a pg?

Do you want Carter or Ellis bringing the ball up?

I've seen them turn the duties over to Derozan, so yes it seems fairly obvious and the GM said we needed to address it.