Doug McDermott, Kings reportedly agree to one-year, $3.6M free-agent contract

  • Thread starter Thread starter NBC Sports BayArea
  • Start date Start date
roster filler is all this is. Kings rookies aren't getting any playing time regardless or very minimal until the dynamic Chicago duo is out.
 
I guess but I don’t want to watch the ball stopping and slow pace he forces on the team. We lost some decent wings got 1 back but other than that it’s the same team.

The game will inevitably slow down in crunch time. And at that point you need to put the ball in someone’s hands to create. Who else could the team have gone to?
 
It’s really not a big deal one way or the other. 15th guy that can hit 40 percent from three if needed but never really plays. Vet leadership kinda deal.

We have to be getting close to the luxury tax though no?

You're not wrong. It's a largely inconsequential move. However, this off-season is starting to develop the stink of futility, and each move, however slight, just ends up adding to the general haze of malaise surrounding this franchise, especially when those moves (and nearly every rumored trade/free agency target) makes the roster older and more defensively inept.

I will give Scott Perry until the trade deadline next year to figure out a direction for this franchise, but I am not the least bit encouraged by his strategy so far, which seems driven by ego and absent self-awareness. If we take him at his motivational speech-loving word, he actually believes that clearing cap space/shedding talent in order to sign Dennis Schroeder to the MLE is a winning move.

I'm not really inclined to be charitable. However, I suppose I could imagine a scenario in which Perry is biding his time and plotting to dump DDR on the first contender who comes calling at the deadline, ship out LaVine when he becomes a useful ending contract, trade Monk after he's rebuilt his value as a super sixth man, and invest in the Kings' existing young talent by clearing space for them to get real minutes/inhabit larger roles, but I'll believe it when I see it.

For now, wasting another season of Domas' prime on a roster of ill fits and rancid defense is just foolish.
 
You're not wrong. It's a largely inconsequential move. However, this off-season is starting to develop the stink of futility, and each move, however slight, just ends up adding to the general haze of malaise surrounding this franchise, especially when those moves (and nearly every rumored trade/free agency target) makes the roster older and more defensively inept.

I will give Scott Perry until the trade deadline next year to figure out a direction for this franchise, but I am not the least bit encouraged by his strategy so far, which seems driven by ego and absent self-awareness. If we take him at his motivational speech-loving word, he actually believes that clearing cap space/shedding talent in order to sign Dennis Schroeder to the MLE is a winning move.

I'm not really inclined to be charitable. However, I suppose I could imagine a scenario in which Perry is biding his time and plotting to dump DDR on the first contender who comes calling at the deadline, ship out LaVine when he becomes a useful ending contract, trade Monk after he's rebuilt his value as a super sixth man, and invest in the Kings' existing young talent by clearing space for them to get real minutes/inhabit larger roles, but I'll believe it when I see it.

For now, wasting another season of Domas' prime on a roster of ill fits and rancid defense is just foolish.

The truly sick thing is I think we actually HAVE the defense to put around Domas, but we just aren't going to do it. If you cycled 3 of Carter, Keon, Nique and Keegan around Domas and 1 of LaVine/Monk/DDR/Dennis, this team would have a much higher chance of actually being a playoff team. But we're going to put the "all offense" squad on the floor a majority of the time while our best defenders, sans Keegan, are going to have minor roles and probably struggle to get PT
 
The truly sick thing is I think we actually HAVE the defense to put around Domas, but we just aren't going to do it. If you cycled 3 of Carter, Keon, Nique and Keegan around Domas and 1 of LaVine/Monk/DDR/Dennis, this team would have a much higher chance of actually being a playoff team. But we're going to put the "all offense" squad on the floor a majority of the time while our best defenders, sans Keegan, are going to have minor roles and probably struggle to get PT
That's what Mike Brown did. Maybe Doug Christie has a different idea. He spent a good deal of time at summer league. In any case, at the moment it sure looks like Mr. Perry has set him up as the fall guy.
 
You're not wrong. It's a largely inconsequential move. However, this off-season is starting to develop the stink of futility, and each move, however slight, just ends up adding to the general haze of malaise surrounding this franchise, especially when those moves (and nearly every rumored trade/free agency target) makes the roster older and more defensively inept.

I will give Scott Perry until the trade deadline next year to figure out a direction for this franchise, but I am not the least bit encouraged by his strategy so far, which seems driven by ego and absent self-awareness. If we take him at his motivational speech-loving word, he actually believes that clearing cap space/shedding talent in order to sign Dennis Schroeder to the MLE is a winning move.

I'm not really inclined to be charitable. However, I suppose I could imagine a scenario in which Perry is biding his time and plotting to dump DDR on the first contender who comes calling at the deadline, ship out LaVine when he becomes a useful ending contract, trade Monk after he's rebuilt his value as a super sixth man, and invest in the Kings' existing young talent by clearing space for them to get real minutes/inhabit larger roles, but I'll believe it when I see it.

For now, wasting another season of Domas' prime on a roster of ill fits and rancid defense is just foolish.

Yeh every intel we have heard is that Scott doesnt see a path to a reset this season due to the contracts. If he can’t move those deals, why not try to win for a year and then take a look in the offseason? Nothing he has done this offseason has hamstrung our future. Deebo can be bought out if not traded and there will be a bit more flexibility with the other contracts. If Nique or Maxi Or IJ or any other flyer turn into a plus starter things can get interesting
 
Yeh every intel we have heard is that Scott doesnt see a path to a reset this season due to the contracts. If he can’t move those deals, why not try to win for a year and then take a look in the offseason? Nothing he has done this offseason has hamstrung our future. Deebo can be bought out if not traded and there will be a bit more flexibility with the other contracts. If Nique or Maxi Or IJ or any other flyer turn into a plus starter things can get interesting

For one it’s a generational draft why miss out on it to land outside the play in or lose by 30 to GSW
 
You're not wrong. It's a largely inconsequential move. However, this off-season is starting to develop the stink of futility, and each move, however slight, just ends up adding to the general haze of malaise surrounding this franchise, especially when those moves (and nearly every rumored trade/free agency target) makes the roster older and more defensively inept.

I will give Scott Perry until the trade deadline next year to figure out a direction for this franchise, but I am not the least bit encouraged by his strategy so far, which seems driven by ego and absent self-awareness. If we take him at his motivational speech-loving word, he actually believes that clearing cap space/shedding talent in order to sign Dennis Schroeder to the MLE is a winning move.

I'm not really inclined to be charitable. However, I suppose I could imagine a scenario in which Perry is biding his time and plotting to dump DDR on the first contender who comes calling at the deadline, ship out LaVine when he becomes a useful ending contract, trade Monk after he's rebuilt his value as a super sixth man, and invest in the Kings' existing young talent by clearing space for them to get real minutes/inhabit larger roles, but I'll believe it when I see it.

For now, wasting another season of Domas' prime on a roster of ill fits and rancid defense is just foolish.
These thoughts are fine in theory, but almost impossible to pull off. It would be great if we can dump off DDR/Lavine/Monk, and even Domas and Dennis (might as well go into a full rebuild then, why waste Domas's prime. Get something in return). However, you can't dump such salaries to clear space for your young guys. You have to take back salaries. Unless you get really lucky, and have a contender with an ender and assets that you want, you have to take a significant player back. Could be a long term salary. If he can be part of your future, great. More likely, he is a middling vet, whom the fans will start hating pretty soon, and demand that he be traded. For larger salaries like Lavine, could even be two or more middling vets. Would you rather have them, or let Lavine's contract expire/bought out at the next season's trade deadline?
 
At this point, we’ve signed so many of Mark Bartlestein’s clients (McBuckets is another one) that I feel like Keon and Keegan are going to get their extensions sooner than later.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
0
Views
403
Sacramento Kings On SI
S
N
Replies
0
Views
154
NBC Sports BayArea
N
S
Replies
0
Views
311
Sacramento Kings On SI
S
Back
Top