D.A.'s office won't prosecute men involved in deadly post-Kings game fight

Status
Not open for further replies.

gotpitbull

G-League
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/12906163p-13754620c.html

The Sacramento District Attorney’s office will not prosecute two Lodi men - Donnie Garibaldi and Jeff Berndt - for their role in a April 20 road rage confrontation after a Kings game near Arco Arena that left banker Mark Leidheisl dead. After reviewing the Sacramento Police Department's investigation, the District Attorney's office said in in a news release issued Tuesday that Leidheisl died as a result of mutual combat between he and Berndt on Prosper Drive, near Truxel Road.


The release said Leidheisl's almost side-swiped Garibaldi's SUV attempting to change lanes while exiting the arena parking lot. David Ott, a passenger in Leidheisl's vehicle, Garibaldi and Berndt, a passenger in the SUV, said Leidheisl began to aggressively challenge the SUV's occupants to a fight.

According to the District Attorney's office, Berndt separated Leidheisl and Garibaldi after they initially fought and wrestled. Leidheisl then turned on Berndt and began hitting him. Berndt then punched Leidheisl in the face, causing him to fall directly back, striking his head on the pavement and suffering a fractured skull.

The investigation revealed that Leidheisl had at least a .13 percent blood alcohol level and opiates were present in a blood sample taken when he arrived at the UC Davis Medical Center. Several witnesses describe a consistent pattern of aggressive behavior by Leidheisl at the game, the release said.

For more details, see Wednesday's Bee.
 
No charges in road-rage death

Banker was the aggressor in fatal fight, and his companion backs other witnesses, says the DA.

By Mareva Brown -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 am PDT Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news. Sign up here.
No criminal charges will be filed in the death of Mark Leidheisl, who died after starting a fight following a Sacramento Kings game last month while drunk and possibly under the influence of opiates, prosecutors announced Tuesday.

Leidheisl, a Wells Fargo senior vice president, first attacked one man and then another before being punched in the face, according to the statement released by Sacramento County District Attorney Jan Scully. That blow sent him to the pavement, where his head slammed against the asphalt. He died two days later of a severe brain injury.

"Mr. Leidheisl started the fight; he was the aggressor," said Deputy District Attorney Lana Wyant. "He wasn't attacked."

Attorneys for both men involved in the fight said their clients - Jeff Berndt and Donnie Garibaldi, both 45 - were relieved by Tuesday's decision but remain saddened by the death of Leidheisl.

Berndt, a tree trimmer from Lodi, and Garibaldi, the director of a Lodi real estate management company, were leaving the Arco Arena parking lot in Garibaldi's Infiniti sport-utility vehicle after the game when they were confronted by an angry Leidheisl in his Mercedes-Benz.

"Jeff is very happy and very, very thankful," said attorney Doug Jacobsen, who represents Berndt, the man who threw the single punch. "He hopes to get his first full night of sleep since this thing happened."

He said Berndt was "too overwhelmed" to speak publicly about the case.

"I like to think that the truth will out, and it did here," said Garibaldi's attorney, Randy Thomas. "I think Mr. (David) Ott told the truth and my client told the truth and the Police Department did a thorough investigation."

Ott was a passenger in Leidheisl's car.

But a lawyer for Leidheisl's widow, Holly, said that Ott described to his client a different series of events and that she is considering filing a civil suit against the two Lodi men.

"She's angry," said the attorney, Don Heller.

Leidheisl, 39, was described by family members and friends as a devoted father to his son, Taylor, and an earnest banker. Heller said Taylor, who turned 13 about two weeks after the fight, has struggled with his father's high-publicity death.

"It's just been awful," Heller said. "To lose your dad and in something that's been so highly publicized is really difficult for him."

Heller said the opiates found in Leidheisl's blood may be related to prescriptions for migraines. He said an anti-depressant, Paxil, which was found in Leidheisl's car that night, was also dispensed following a doctor's prescription.

Prosecutors said Tuesday that in addition to the Paxil, there was an "extended tab Morphine" and an unidentified third pill in an unmarked pill bottle in Leidheisl's car.

Leidheisl's blood-alcohol level was 0.13 percent - more than 1 1/2 times the legal limit - when it was taken at UC Davis Medical Center.

Among the critical factors in the district attorney's decision about whether to file criminal charges in the case, which has been the subject of intense interest from the public, was the fact that Ott corroborated the statements of virtually every witness at the game and the two men involved in the fight.

Witnesses at the game and Ott described "a consistent pattern of insulting and aggressive behavior by Mr. Leidheisl" during the April 20 Kings game against the Phoenix Suns, Scully said in her statement.

One man, who sat in front of Leidheisl at the game, told Sacramento police investigators that Leidheisl was intentionally flicking his headphones and the attached antenna. Others at the game said he was watching men walk up the stairs at Arco Arena and telling Ott that he could "take" them in a fight.

As fans left the game, Leidheisl was "driving recklessly and at an excessive speed," according to Scully's statement. Ott told police investigators he was "scared of Mark's driving and was telling him to slow down," the report said.

At one point, a traffic officer yelled at Leidheisl to slow down.

Leidheisl first encountered Garibaldi in the parking lot where two traffic lanes merged into one. The banker became angry when he had to slam the brakes to avoid hitting Garibaldi, according to Ott's statement to police.

As the two vehicles traveled down Truxel Road, Leidheisl began "aggressively" challenging Garibaldi and Berndt to fight, all three witnesses told police. When Leidheisl pulled off onto Prosper Drive, Garibaldi followed.

"Just before the turn, Leidheisl asked Ott if he (Ott) thought they could take them," Scully said in her report. "Ott admitted replying, 'Yeah, let's take these guys.' "

But when Ott and Berndt emerged from the passenger seats of their respective vehicles, they did not fight.

Ott told police that he made eye contact with Berndt and told him the fight was Leidheisl's "deal" and that he wanted no part of it. He backed a short distance from Leidheisl's car into a nearby field.

Meanwhile, the two drivers quickly became entangled in a fight. Ott told detectives he thought Leidheisl was losing; Berndt saw it differently.

Sensing that his friend was about to be hurt, Berndt stepped in to break up the fight, according to Scully's report. As Garibaldi headed for his car, Leidheisl turned on Berndt.

"Berndt deflected most of these blows, but one struck him on the side of the head, by the right ear," Scully's report said. "Berndt responded with one punch, striking Leidheisl in the face, likely in the lower mouth area."

As Leidheisl hit the asphalt, the two Lodi men drove away. Ott, meanwhile, came to Leidheisl's side, saw he was bleeding from the head and called 911.

The next day, after hearing that Leidheisl was near death, Garibaldi and Berndt and their attorneys voluntarily came to Sacramento police investigators to make statements. "Each of the four men involved in this series of events exercised poor judgment," Scully said in the press release. "(But) the exercise of poor judgment does not equal criminal conduct in this case."
 
The burden of proof is much lower in civil court. So, I anticipate this will case surely will end up in civil court.

Another alcohol related tragedy.
 
I hope so .... something just ain't right about this.

These guys, got away with at least, manslaughter.

The logic is this, if you are involved in a fight that - you didn't start, and the other guy is OUT OF HIS GOURD, it's okay to KICK HIS A$$ then KILL HIS A$$.

This is crazy .....
 
Well, to be fair there were some other factors involved. The decedent was by all accounts being the aggressor and generally an a-hole during the game and the time leading up to the fight. Also, having a blood alcohol level of .13 and opiates in his system surely played a part in his behavior,

Unless I missed something the passenger of the SUV only threw one punch after being attacked by the decedent. So, I'm not sure they beat the the hell out of the guy it was his head strking the curb which caused the brain injury.
 
This thing can be scrutinized up-n-down ...

It's a shame ... this whole thing could've been avoided ... it didn't have to happen.
 
Well, this turned out like I thought it would. The lesson, as always, if you run your mouth bad things will happen.
 
Folsom Al said:
I hope so .... something just ain't right about this.

These guys, got away with at least, manslaughter.

The logic is this, if you are involved in a fight that - you didn't start, and the other guy is OUT OF HIS GOURD, it's okay to KICK HIS A$$ then KILL HIS A$$.

This is crazy .....

I don't see it like that. Nobody said it's OK to kill anyone. Accidents happen. They especially happen when you're high as a kite and attacking two large men. I'd say it's closer to a suicide than manslaughter. I could see myself in that situation, some crazy guy attacking me, I just might hit him back. I don't think that split second decision would justify my ending up in prison, or liable for monetary damages to his family.

Just because the guy unfortunately ended up dead doesn't mean he wasn't responsible for his own actions.
~~
 
Okay, so the dead guy pulls into a parking lot and the two guys follow him:

The autopsy showed this guys was as HIGH AS A KITE

The two guys turned themselves in the next day ... what condition were they in the night this fight occured ??? The court will never know except for taking these guy's word .... no breath-alyzer

Like I said, these two guys followed this guy (who was shouting obscentities and calling them out) into the parking lot. What was their idea/intent once they confronted this guy ???

I'm sure I've pissed off a few people (unintentional of course) with my driving and alot of people have pissed me off. But, I don't go off following them around with intention of getting even. I don't know if they have a gun or some other weapon. Plus, I'm responsible for the passengers in my car. If I pee somebody off, I wave at 'em, say I'm sorry with a smile. The last thing I want is TROUBLE.

That's why I say these guys had some intention when they followed him into the lot. What else were they going to do ... then this guys starts fighting ... geez, it's two vs one ... they coulda sat on him till the law came.

I know, we weren't there and we don't know all that went down ... but, like I say.

This could've all been avoided if the two guys DIDN'T FOLLOW HIM.

ps: just so you know, I understand where you are coming from ... it's just that there are some things around this incident that are familiar to me, not this case, but something similar to it, that deeply affected my family. A family member of mine was lost ...
 
AL, i'm sorry that this particular incident strikes you more personally than maybe it does the rest of us.

I certainly agree with the statement none of this needed to happen, and its just ridiculously stupid that it did.

however, based on what has been released by the police, the DA and witness accounts, i don't have much in the way of sypmathy for the "victim". sometimes when you do really stupid things you pay a price, and you only have yourself to blame.

too often "we" look to point the finger and lay blame at someone else instead of holding a person accountable for their actions. again, only by what i've read (and i've read every bit on this from the first time it was in the paper) this was a stupid incident with everyone involved acting like an absolute moron, with the possible exception of the person who left the scene.

still, to me this didn't have to happen if the guy wasn't drunk, wasn't high, and didn't get out of his car and try to fight two other guys.
 
Well Al, I see what you mean... it's NEVER a good idea to pull over and get out of your car to have a confrontation with someone. But what sort of seals it for me is the passenger confirming what happened and basically sticking up for the SUV guys.

There's no denying it's a terrible tragedy, one that could have been avoided by better decisions on both sides. In this litigious society, though, it's unlikely that all affected parties will be willing to admit as much and just move on, unfortunately.
~~
 
Thanks People ...

This kinda stuff just burns me up ... it's stupid

Granted, the guy that died was being a jerk about the whole thing ...

... and he lost his life from being a jerk.

I constantly tell my kids, regardless of who's right or wrong, be the smart person, apologize and just walk away .... it's hard to do ... but, turn around, say you're sorry and just walk away.
 
FA - You can feel the pain of the guy's family because of personal experience with a related type of situation. I, on the other hand, can understand the other side because of something that happened to a very good friend of mine a long time ago.

Sometimes stupid stuff gets out of hand and people say and do things they wish they hadn't done. It doesn't make them bad people. Sometimes people end up dead because, in hindsight, a whole bunch of stupid things happened in just the right (or wrong) order. It doesn't always mean that someone has to be held responsible and "pay" for it.

Those two men are going to have to carry the burden of knowing a man lost his life because of something they were involved with. It's not an easy burden to carry. My friend did something - and someone died. And 30 years later, so did he because - even though he was never charged with anything - he simply couldn't ever really get past what had happened.
 
Folsom Al said:
Thanks People ...

This kinda stuff just burns me up ... it's stupid

Granted, the guy that died was being a jerk about the whole thing ...

... and he lost his life from being a jerk.

I constantly tell my kids, regardless of who's right or wrong, be the smart person, apologize and just walk away .... it's hard to do ... but, turn around, say you're sorry and just walk away.


im sorry this hit home for you. i just think the comment of him losing his life because he was a jerk is a little too harsh and judgemental. unless you knew him personally, i dont think you can make that assumption.
 
thesanityannex said:
im sorry this hit home for you. i just think the comment of him losing his life because he was a jerk is a little too harsh and judgemental. unless you knew him personally, i dont think you can make that assumption.

Sorry if you're offended ... I'm human as well and can make mistakes. I based my opinion on what was written in the article and what people who encountered him during the evening said.

Like I said .... to me the guy acted like a complete jerk. Just cause he was high doesn't give him CARTE BLANCHE to be a non-human being.

If jerk is too harsh a word for you, how about inconsiderate person ???

FYI - www.dictionary.com

Definition of ... jerk
  1. A sudden abrupt motion, such as a yank or twist.
  2. A jolting or lurching motion.
  3. Physiology A sudden reflexive or spasmodic muscular movement.
  4. [font=arial,sans-serif][size=-1]jerks[/size][/font] Involuntary convulsive twitching often resulting from excitement. Often used with the.
  5. Slang A foolish, rude, or contemptible person.
  6. Sports A lift in which the weight is heaved overhead from shoulder height with a quick motion.
 
Last edited:
no offense was taken. i didnt mean for you to think that i thought it was wrong to call him a jerk, which he obviously was. just that fact that being a jerk caused his death. i like the how you provided the definition too. lol.
 
i know this was posted on another thread and im wondering why the drug part was not spoken of in the other thread. for a moment, i thought there were two incidents.
vf21, you closed the thread right? were the drug allegations found after? or just left out?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top