His/Her reason for not wanting to do the trade was "because you have no guarantees at all what that pick will become."
This should never be a reason for turning down a trade as I illustrated with my reference to trading him for the #1 overall pick. It's all about risk. Is the risk of the player being worse worth the risk of the player being better than Bogdan. The black & white approach referenced above is not how the real world operates.
It's a perfectly legitimate question to ask someone who says I will not trade Bogdan for a top 5/top 10 pick "because you have no guarantees at all what that pick will become." The same exact "reason" can be stated for why one wouldn't trade Bogdan for the #1 overall. Technically, the #1 overall pick is not a guarantee therefore we should not trade Bogdan for said pick. As you can see, this logic is weak at best, and it's why I attacked it.
I'm sorry but your logic makes no sense whatsoever. You're now saying that considering a trade of a good player for a top 5/10 pick is the same as considering a trade of that same player for a #1 pick?
If that's true, than why not just trade every player ever year to somebody for any draft pick? I'm gonna leave it to others to continue. My eyes have rolled so far back in my head I cannot see my screen.
