Bill to expedite environmental reviews could help Sacramento arena project

JB_kings

Starter
A last-minute bill to expedite environmental review on a downtown Los Angeles football stadium may pave the way for similar exceptions on other construction projects, including a downtown arena in Sacramento.
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg is talking with Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez and Gov. Jerry Brown about a companion measure to accelerate judicial review for alternative energy manufacturing plants, clean energy projects and urban infill, including sports stadiums, according to sources who would not be named because negotiations are ongoing.
As with the Los Angeles stadium proposal, Senate Bill 292, the broader legislation would allow developers to ask state appellate courts to review environmental challenges on a shortened timetable. Under SB 292, the Los Angeles-based 2nd District Court of Appeal would issue a decision on a stadium challenge within 175 days, cutting 100 days or more off the typical process, according to an Assembly analysis.
"I think the L.A. stadium project is very worthy," said Steinberg, a Sacramento Democrat. "I also think this is a unique moment in time to do everything we can to focus on expediting existing processes to help our economy recover. There are a lot of productive discussions going back and forth."
Steinberg declined to discuss specifics.
Anschutz Entertainment Group has proposed a $1.3 billion NFL stadium adjacent to the Staples Center in Los Angeles. Some environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, offered conditional support Tuesday after negotiating changes to the bill. Others such as Sierra Club California remain opposed because they say AEG is getting special treatment in the closing days of the legislative session.
The companion measure Steinberg is seeking would authorize the governor to decide which projects qualify, using environmental targets such as low carbon emissions as criteria, according to a legislative source. The proposal would fast-track projects that include farms generating wind power, electric car factories and downtown sports complexes.


Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/07/3889453/bill-to-expedite-environmental.html#ixzz1XHNRqQ1U
 
A last-minute bill to expedite environmental review on a downtown Los Angeles football stadium may pave the way for similar exceptions on other construction projects, including a downtown arena in Sacramento.
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg is talking with Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez and Gov. Jerry Brown about a companion measure to accelerate judicial review for alternative energy manufacturing plants, clean energy projects and urban infill, including sports stadiums, according to sources who would not be named because negotiations are ongoing.
As with the Los Angeles stadium proposal, Senate Bill 292, the broader legislation would allow developers to ask state appellate courts to review environmental challenges on a shortened timetable. Under SB 292, the Los Angeles-based 2nd District Court of Appeal would issue a decision on a stadium challenge within 175 days, cutting 100 days or more off the typical process, according to an Assembly analysis.
"I think the L.A. stadium project is very worthy," said Steinberg, a Sacramento Democrat. "I also think this is a unique moment in time to do everything we can to focus on expediting existing processes to help our economy recover. There are a lot of productive discussions going back and forth."
Steinberg declined to discuss specifics.
Anschutz Entertainment Group has proposed a $1.3 billion NFL stadium adjacent to the Staples Center in Los Angeles. Some environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, offered conditional support Tuesday after negotiating changes to the bill. Others such as Sierra Club California remain opposed because they say AEG is getting special treatment in the closing days of the legislative session.
The companion measure Steinberg is seeking would authorize the governor to decide which projects qualify, using environmental targets such as low carbon emissions as criteria, according to a legislative source. The proposal would fast-track projects that include farms generating wind power, electric car factories and downtown sports complexes.


Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09/07/3889453/bill-to-expedite-environmental.html#ixzz1XHNRqQ1U

Wonder if Steinberg did this as part of a deal that AEG would help on the Arena here?
 
Yeah last I heard this was a LA NFL stadium deal only. Now it looks like it's getting changed to open up to other projects. Might be some wheeling and dealing taking place since then. On the surface I think it should pass. It's not like it bypasses EIR, it just shortens from a joke level of 275 days down to 175. Even at 175 they really are creeping along here. So someone's gravy train payroll gets cut by 100 days. If it was me, I would have taken it down to 90 days total. I think they can do just as good of a review job in 90 days as they do in 275.
 
Wonder if Steinberg did this as part of a deal that AEG would help on the Arena here?
I'm sure Steinberg knows it would help an arena in Sacramento.

But the truth is, why should LA get a sweetheart deal all by itself. It's ojectionable on the grounds of favoritism. Steinberg is right. If it's helpful to get that project going, maybe they should consider it to help get a lot of projects around the state going. I don't see how anyone could think it should only apply to LA's football stadium. That reeks of palm greasing.
 
I'm sure Steinberg knows it would help an arena in Sacramento.

But the truth is, why should LA get a sweetheart deal all by itself. It's ojectionable on the grounds of favoritism. Steinberg is right. If it's helpful to get that project going, maybe they should consider it to help get a lot of projects around the state going. I don't see how anyone could think it should only apply to LA's football stadium. That reeks of palm greasing.

I'm not referring to having a similar bill to help sacramento. More along the lines if I propsed this bill to help your NFL stadium and you run the Sacramento arena and put some money into building it.
 
Except Steinberg didn't propose the bill. It was someone reperesenting LA. Steinberg basically said if it's good for getting this project going faster, then maybe we should look at the good it could do for other ptojects in the State, too.
 
Back
Top